|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 30, 2008 11:03:11 GMT
i 'm sorry that in your wisdom you feel it necessary to condemn what is a legitimate post in the wheeled section.
I actually believe what I write and therefore slightly aggrieved that you don't like it...
Fuck you.!
I'm might be a Stoke fan...but I'm not a fucking Lemming..!
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Mar 30, 2008 11:11:24 GMT
Why do you feel the need to start a new thread about a subject that is clearly on the board, has nine pages, nearly 250 replies and almost 4,000 views?
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Mar 30, 2008 11:15:43 GMT
this will be an interesting one.i'm all eyes.
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 30, 2008 11:17:06 GMT
Why gives you the right to deny a different approach/tangent.
I have replied to other threads on this subject last night.
Why 'lock it' EVEN in the wheeled section.
There was no abuse from me....but there was from penners.!
Why is it that whenever I put a post on...It never has 'new' alongside it.?
Are you against me... or is it just free speech in general Davef.?
This post was different and does not break any rules...Sour fucking Grapes.!
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Mar 30, 2008 11:17:59 GMT
good one.
|
|
|
Post by potters 22 on Mar 30, 2008 11:20:48 GMT
Agree with mumf!
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Mar 30, 2008 11:22:11 GMT
Why is it so difficult to join in the debate on an existing thread?
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 30, 2008 11:24:00 GMT
Dave f,,,,I have already answered that...Can you read...?
Answer the fucking questions....!
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Mar 30, 2008 11:31:53 GMT
Come off it mumf.
It is pure attention seeking.
Since when did a thread have to deal with an issue from one dimension? The whole point of a thread on a particular subject is that it captures many different viewpoints on a subject.
If everyone started a new thread for every different opinion on a given matter it would just be a nonesense.
The truth is that you wanted to make sure everyone saw YOUR opinion!
This belongs in the general section by the way.
|
|
|
Post by Mr_DaftBurger on Mar 30, 2008 11:34:39 GMT
I was`just going to say he shouldn't be wheeled he should be tooled and who should then turn up? ;D
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 30, 2008 11:36:17 GMT
Woolystanton...No it's not Mark...Absolutely not.!
Don't take sides...It's mumf bashing .
I am being serious...
Is he/you prepared to answer the questions posed..
This fucking stinks...!
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Mar 30, 2008 11:38:02 GMT
question must be answered ;D
|
|
|
Post by Penners on Mar 30, 2008 11:38:52 GMT
Mumf, abuse from Penners ;D. If you didn't talk such shite, you wouldn't invite it upon yourself.
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Mar 30, 2008 11:39:25 GMT
I've expanded my original post to answer your question.
That is the only reason DaveF moved your thread on a subject that is already being widely debated.
I will be moving this to the general section shortly.
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 30, 2008 11:40:50 GMT
Oh look...The wheeled thread has miraculously been un-locked....There's a start,.!
|
|
|
Post by Penners on Mar 30, 2008 11:42:53 GMT
Mumf, shut up!
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 30, 2008 11:43:59 GMT
They're doing that for me...It's called censorship...!
|
|
|
Post by Penners on Mar 30, 2008 11:45:26 GMT
I seem to still be reading your posts though
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Mar 30, 2008 11:46:27 GMT
In a perfect world, mumf your post would have been merged with the thread already dealing with this subject.
As this is only a temporary home for The Oatcake we have not taken the package out with pro-boards that allows that facility.
Whilst decisions are made on the final home for The Oatcake the only option we have to stop the board turning over with thread after thread dealing with the same matter is to try and encourage people top keep one subject matter to one thread.
The board is far too popular and well used to allow anything else.
It certainly is not a mumf bash.
Good grief man, you post regularly enough to not make such a silly accusation when we edit one single post by you!
|
|
berty
Spectator
Posts: 36
|
Post by berty on Mar 30, 2008 11:47:49 GMT
mumf, the moderators have moved your post because it wasn't a new topic, just a different perspective on an existing topic. All you've got to do is copy and paste your original view into the correct thread where everyone else is debating it. This is just common sense.
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Mar 30, 2008 11:48:43 GMT
cracking reply by mw ;D
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 30, 2008 11:52:04 GMT
I don't accept your excuses.
I replied to three other threads on this subject last night ...So why pick on mine...?>
Why single out my thread which was different when ten or more others are deemed acceptable to continue with.?
I still haven't heard from 'God /Dave f yet regarding the other questions>?
Am I likely to get a proper answer or more fucking excuses.?
Pathetic...Why was the wheeled thread locked.?
|
|
|
Post by MarkWolstanton on Mar 30, 2008 11:54:43 GMT
It is entirely a matter for you as to whether you wish to accept a perfectly valid reason or continue sulking.
berty has provided you with the the resolution to your problem.
|
|
|
Post by stokiematt on Mar 30, 2008 11:55:34 GMT
lock this right piss him off ;D
|
|
|
Post by Penners on Mar 30, 2008 11:55:39 GMT
Do you want a cuddle Mumf
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 30, 2008 11:57:46 GMT
Yeah....Good reply...!
Thanks God.
Mumf.(Still no answers tho'....)
|
|
|
Post by ChrisEvans on Mar 30, 2008 12:00:45 GMT
Can't Admin do what they like? As they run the place? Do they have to justify everything they do? (they have justified it as well) It's their board and we play by their rules don't we? If we don't like it there are other playgrounds to play in.
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 30, 2008 12:03:58 GMT
Chris Evans Yes......So do the F.A IRONICALLY......!(i.e make their own rules)
Please see my wheeled thread for details.
|
|
|
Post by ChrisEvans on Mar 30, 2008 12:10:20 GMT
Chris Evans Yes......So do the F.A IRONICALLY......!(i.e make their own rules) Please see my wheeled thread for details. And the FA rules were broken weren't they? If we'd have done it you can bet your bottom doller that Wednesday would be up in arms screaming for 3 points.
|
|