|
Post by apb1979 on Feb 27, 2004 17:00:57 GMT
According to Skysports news Jason Roberts Sending off against Stoke has been overturned after a successful appeal by the wigan player. I just cant understand how the hell that cheat got away with that blatant dive.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 27, 2004 17:02:34 GMT
What I can't understand is how he got away with that red card and yet John Eustace (West Brom) and Richard Johnson (Wimbledon) failed with their appeals?
I'm guessing these appeals have something to do with the toss of a coin!!!
Smudge
|
|
|
Post by Trout_Licker on Feb 27, 2004 17:06:22 GMT
what a joke
|
|
|
Post by no1stokie on Feb 27, 2004 17:06:57 GMT
Looking at the replay, however many times i've looked i can't tell why he was sent off but from where i was sitting he obviously kicked the stoke player!
Maybe the appeal board do flip a coin or just they got the same video view as i got!
|
|
|
Post by Pricey on Feb 27, 2004 17:07:23 GMT
cough cough cough......bribe......cough cough....back-handers.....cough cough
|
|
|
Post by apb1979 on Feb 27, 2004 17:08:51 GMT
I havent seen the actual incident but i saw the blatent dive he did in the 1st half and which the ref did absolutely nothing about. He should of got sent off for that.
|
|
|
Post by POS51 on Feb 27, 2004 17:19:01 GMT
Typifys the FA's quite bizzare systems.
They wonder why people dont seem to have any respect for them anymore. ???
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Feb 27, 2004 19:54:45 GMT
Absolutely disgraceful that is. The whole scheme is and always has been. He shoul have had his ban extended by a number of games for his blatant cheating during the match and referees who produce crap decisions (eg. Styles, Prosser, Ref @ West Brom etc) should be suspended instead. Teams should also have the right to appeal on other incidents (other players), so if we (typically) have Ade (4 eg) sent off, but the opposition dive about and fould all game, we should have right of appeal to try to get the msuspended, all for justice of course (unless it's one of the quitters teams ;D)
|
|
|
Post by kajshdfsiuf on Feb 27, 2004 20:18:31 GMT
cough cough....blatter's cock.....jewell's mouth....porty-potty......cough cough
|
|
|
Post by no1stokie on Feb 27, 2004 20:31:58 GMT
cough cough splutter cough cough
|
|
|
Post by no1stokie on Feb 27, 2004 20:32:42 GMT
What? Everyone else was coughing!
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Feb 27, 2004 20:37:00 GMT
cough/cough**splutter**Absolutely disgraceful that is. The whole scheme is and always has been. He shoul have had his ban extended by a number of games for his blatant cheating during the match and referees who produce crap decisions (eg. Styles, Prosser, Ref @ West Brom etc) should be suspended instead. Teams should also have the right to appeal on other incidents (other players), so if we (typically) have Ade (4 eg) sent off, but the opposition dive about and fould all game, we should have right of appeal to try to get the msuspended, all for justice of course (unless it's one of the quitters teams )hack cough hack ;D
|
|
|
Post by no1stokie on Feb 27, 2004 20:38:48 GMT
Who did you get those words off? I can't remember where i heard them!
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Feb 27, 2004 21:09:14 GMT
Words? ??? ??? ??? ???
|
|
|
Post by Hooky on Feb 27, 2004 21:35:46 GMT
|
|
|
Post by tel2u on Feb 27, 2004 21:53:39 GMT
At £600 per hearing and already getting £1200 from Stoke plus fines, the disciplinary committee were probably well over their budgeted income for February!
The whole bloody system is a joke!
|
|
|
Post by no1stokie on Feb 27, 2004 21:58:12 GMT
O yer, just rewatched the highlights from SCFC world and agree it is clear!
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Feb 27, 2004 22:07:44 GMT
Now we know why we're £8 million (i think) in debt.... it was really just a prediction of our FA costs
|
|
|
Post by no1stokie on Feb 27, 2004 22:12:33 GMT
Yeah yeah, it's fucking shit we have to pay in two ways for refs being absolute shit! We lsot the game and we lose a lot of money getting nowhere (in more cases than not)!
|
|