|
|
Post by StokieMatt on Jan 30, 2011 15:58:52 GMT
if we signed a conjoined twin, would it class as one player or 2?  its scary what goes on in my head. |
|
|
|
Post by Murdoc Niccals on Jan 30, 2011 16:00:52 GMT
Are you on drugs? ???  |
|
|
|
Post by 606Stokie on Jan 30, 2011 16:02:00 GMT
Hehe! I would guess 2 otherwise there would be more than 11 arms and legs on a pitch!
|
|
|
|
Post by gazscfc on Jan 30, 2011 16:02:36 GMT
Serious answer - it is not something that needs to be decided because there is no way that a conjoined twin would be good enough to play professional football.
|
|
|
|
Post by mickstupp on Jan 30, 2011 16:02:51 GMT
"Serious Question"
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by harryburrows on Jan 30, 2011 16:04:01 GMT
we could play 3 up front
|
|
|
|
Post by StokieMatt on Jan 30, 2011 16:04:10 GMT
Serious answer - it is not something that needs to be decided because there is no way that a conjoined twin would be good enough to play professional football. thats discrimination  |
|
|
|
Post by huuuuuth on Jan 30, 2011 16:11:19 GMT
Depends if they've got 1 birth certificate or 2.
PS
Matt, you're a strange lad ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by StokieMatt on Jan 30, 2011 16:18:28 GMT
Hehe! I would guess 2 otherwise there would be more than 11 arms and legs on a pitch! well theres 22 arms and 22 legs on each team now ;D n thanks huuuuuth ;D |
|
|
|
Post by stokie25 on Jan 30, 2011 16:20:15 GMT
I'm far more concerned about you matt than i am a conjoined twin signing to be honest petal |
|
|
|
Post by StokieMatt on Jan 30, 2011 16:29:51 GMT
I'm far more concerned about you matt than i am a conjoined twin signing to be honest petal would we need pay them both or it 30/40k so a 60/80k wage bill for them? or would it be 30k for em both this could be the deal breaker if im honest. but would it be classed as breaking the wage budget?  could be a bargain if we could find the right conjoined twin. this is serious. |
|
|
|
Post by StokieMatt on Jan 30, 2011 16:38:38 GMT
 they allow it in basketball. |
|
|
|
Post by Inverness Stokie on Jan 30, 2011 16:42:55 GMT
Typical Matt!
I guess it'd be one, welll if Tone was the Stoke City doctor it'd be one.
;D
|
|
|
|
Post by PenkhullStokie on Jan 30, 2011 18:29:27 GMT
I'm far more concerned about you matt than i am a conjoined twin signing to be honest petal would we need pay them both or it 30/40k so a 60/80k wage bill for them? or would it be 30k for em both this could be the deal breaker if im honest. but would it be classed as breaking the wage budget? could be a bargain if we could find the right conjoined twin. this is serious. They'd have one wage, because they'd only have 1 house, 1 car. They'd never be athletic enough to play pro anyway. |
|
|
|
Post by miltonstokie on Jan 30, 2011 18:39:31 GMT
im guessing the best position would be goalie ? Could be a few injuries diving etc |
|
|
|
Post by 606Stokie on Jan 30, 2011 19:52:04 GMT
Hehe! I would guess 2 otherwise there would be more than 11 arms and legs on a pitch! well theres 22 arms and 22 legs on each team now ;D n thanks huuuuuth ;D And just pay them at least there is more chance of them winning a header than Jones atm. |
|
|
|
Post by tazi on Jan 30, 2011 21:15:47 GMT
I suppose that if it ever did happen then for fear of being sacked you'd never hear the saying we got a 'double header' of footy coming up.
|
|
|
|
Post by trevo711 on Jan 30, 2011 21:26:47 GMT
You daft sausage
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jan 30, 2011 21:29:18 GMT
If one of them was born just before midnight and the other a few seconds later, just after midnight, they would have different birthdays.
This could cause problems if the younger one was picked to play in an under 21 International when the other one was too old to qualify as under 21. The older one would have to go along to the game but would not be allowed to play the ball with any part of his anatomy. In fact if he touched the ball in the penalty area they'd probably award a penalty for "twin ball". ;D
And they'd have to wear different coloured kit - only the younger one could be involved in an offside decision.
|
|
|
|
Post by stokeseagull on Jan 30, 2011 21:35:01 GMT
would you have to bring off 1 or 2 players if they came on as sub?
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Jan 30, 2011 21:38:17 GMT
We should have a couple of Parkins old shirts lying about that would fit them/him
|
|
|
|
Post by MrDBrent on Jan 30, 2011 21:42:00 GMT
or how about this, Stoke sign a large spider like creature with 8 legs, would it be allowed?
|
|
|
|
Post by KernowSvenSki on Jan 30, 2011 21:44:33 GMT
I love the fact that you started the thread on the footy forum rather than the GDB. |
|
|
|
Post by ST5-POTTER on Jan 30, 2011 21:44:46 GMT
im guessing the best position would be goalie ? Could be a few injuries diving etc ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by stokeseagull on Jan 30, 2011 21:46:19 GMT
Tp dream signing if they were both 6 foot 5 and black.... with a combined height of 13 feet maybe we'd finally score from one of those fucking throw ins from delap
|
|
|
|
Post by larstoke on Jan 30, 2011 21:54:09 GMT
Im a conjoined twin and Im deeply offended by this thread.
and so is my brother.
|
|
|
|
Post by StokieMatt on Jan 31, 2011 9:52:51 GMT
I love the fact that you started the thread on the footy forum rather than the GDB. its about football is it not. |
|
its scary what goes on in my head.
could be a bargain if we could find the right conjoined twin.
