|
Post by miltonpotterfan on Jan 23, 2011 13:47:27 GMT
when our goals come from corners and wing play? I'm getting fed up of the favoritism by Pulis. Grow a pair TP and play
Pennant-Wilson-Whitehead-Etherington
And don't dare sell Fuller our only player who can change a game and exciting to watch.
|
|
|
Post by Trouserdog on Jan 23, 2011 13:53:32 GMT
Fuck knows...it's totally unfathomable to me.
This fear of playing wingers is the single most annoying Pulis-ism of the several that he regularly exhibits. I quite like Rory in centre midfield, but he's embarrassingly slow out-wide and offers us no outlet. He's not even as good at tracking back as Pennant is.
I'd defy any of the Pulis-arse-licking cretins on here to offer one valid reason as to why this is a good idea.
They won't though...they'll just say "we're 9th For fucks sake" or "How many coaching badges have you got" or "Please Tony, unload your hot spunk down my throat".
|
|
|
Post by miltonpotterfan on Jan 23, 2011 14:06:44 GMT
exactly we could be alot higher than 9th now if he played his best players, Sunderland & Bolton examples.
Don't get me wrong he's doing a great job but he could do so much better I think if he played the best team and not old plodders out of position on the right side.
|
|
|
Post by trevo711 on Jan 23, 2011 14:08:11 GMT
I thought the days of Delap playing on the right had past. With Pennant and even Tuncay impressing on the wing, it beats me that Pulis puts Delap there ahead of them two!
|
|
|
Post by alster on Jan 23, 2011 14:14:43 GMT
when our goals come from corners and wing play? I'm getting fed up of the favoritism by Pulis. Grow a pair TP and play Pennant-Wilson-Whitehead-Etherington And don't dare sell Fuller our only player who can change a game and exciting to watch. I don't believe he's right but he's a stab at why he's doing it. He wants a passer in the middle of the park, sees Wilson as that man. Delap, Whitehead, Whelan, Diao non of them good enough to hold the centre with Wilson for various reasons. so he makes a useless compromise and sacrifices Pennant to allow him to play 3 CM's. As I say its a bollox kinda compromise but the alternative is admitting to himself that some of his favorite piano carriers don't really have the tools for the job. As I see it the alternatives are play Pennant and go back to Rory and Whitehead in the middle or play Pennant and replace the whole central midfield in the transfer market. All the other options are complete dross. I'd go for option 2 but it won't come cheap.
|
|
|
Post by potters 22 on Jan 23, 2011 14:16:22 GMT
Pennant not fully fit.
|
|
|
Post by nystoke on Jan 23, 2011 14:20:22 GMT
It's 2 from 3 between Deano, Delap and Wilson. You have to play Pennant and Matty on the wings every game. We started doing and had some success and all of sudden he changed it for the Bolton game and it paid off luckily. We chase after Pennant all season, he has a successful loan spell, sign him up and put him on the bench....why??
|
|
|
Post by crewepotter on Jan 23, 2011 14:25:22 GMT
I agree that our best team should have Etherington and Pennant out wide, but also i think our best centre mid pairing is still Delap and Whitehead.
|
|
|
Post by alster on Jan 23, 2011 14:28:30 GMT
I agree that our best team should have Etherington and Pennant out wide, but also i think our best centre mid pairing is still Delap and Whitehead. Well if you're saying its the best we can put out from what we have you're probably right. If you're telling me its satisfactory, thats just complete arse.
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stokie on Jan 23, 2011 14:29:08 GMT
I can only assume that Pennant isn't fit yet as he really does give our midfield great balance and his dead ball delivery and crossing are second to none.
|
|
|
Post by tweet on Jan 23, 2011 14:29:15 GMT
I agree that our best team should have Etherington and Pennant out wide, but also i think our best centre mid pairing is still Delap and Whitehead. i agree but the centre two need improving
|
|
|
Post by foster on Jan 23, 2011 14:29:54 GMT
I don't get why we played with our two tallest strikers who ideally thrive on crosses (not long balls) with a midfield consisting of Whelan, Whitehead, Delap, Wilson...
With those four we're never going to get any crosses in.
With KJ and JC up front, we HAVE to play two out and out wingers in Pennant and Ethers - at the same time.
As for playing Whelan... well, i can't condone that under any circumstances.
|
|
|
Post by A-teen_six_T3 on Jan 23, 2011 14:31:22 GMT
I think, with regards to Delap playing at RM, Wilson and Whitehead are out best two CM, Ethers is out better winget IMO...Yesterday pitch size was crying out for, long throws...He neeeded to fit Delap in somewhere
|
|
|
Post by alster on Jan 23, 2011 14:38:51 GMT
I think, with regards to Delap playing at RM, Wilson and Whitehead are out best two CM, Ethers is out better winget IMO...Yesterday pitch size was crying out for, long throws...He neeeded to fit Delap in somewhere Whithead gives away a free kick virtually everytime he makes a challenge even when he's in tandem with another defensive midfielder like Rory. If he had to hold the middle with only occasional help from an attacking midfielder, he'd have to cover even more ground, as a result his challenges would be even more poorly timed (if thats possible) I suspect he'd see a lot of red cards. To play an attacking midfielder you need a midfield destroyer and contrary to what some on this board believe we haven't got one.
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Jan 23, 2011 14:39:33 GMT
Because he played very well there against Bolton and kept his place. It was the same with Tuncay, but I don't see any 'why does Tuncay get picked ahead of Ric' threads.
Anyway, the real question is 'why was Wilson picked ahead of Delap in the centre, meaning that our best central midfielder was stuck out on the right?'
|
|
|
Post by skelman on Jan 23, 2011 14:40:56 GMT
Is this a trick question or does it have anything to do with Rory being one of Tone's favourites?
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 23, 2011 14:45:17 GMT
Because he played very well there against Bolton and kept his place. It was the same with Tuncay, but I don't see any 'why does Tuncay get picked ahead of Ric' threads. Anyway, the real question is 'why was Wilson picked ahead of Delap in the centre, meaning that our best central midfielder was stuck out on the right?' I think alster nailed it in one earlier MD ... I don't believe he's right but he's a stab at why he's doing it. He wants a passer in the middle of the park, sees Wilson as that man. Delap, Whitehead, Whelan, Diao non of them good enough to hold the centre with Wilson for various reasons. so he makes a useless compromise and sacrifices Pennant to allow him to play 3 CM's. As I say its a bollox kinda compromise but the alternative is admitting to himself that some of his favorite piano carriers don't really have the tools for the job. As I see it the alternatives are play Pennant and go back to Rory and Whitehead in the middle or play Pennant and replace the whole central midfield in the transfer market. All the other options are complete dross. I'd go for option 2 but it won't come cheap.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Jan 23, 2011 14:45:29 GMT
It's sad day when delap gets credited as being our best CM
Yes, he's a legend, but after 2,5 years in the prem you would have thought we would brought in some much better CMs.
|
|
|
Post by alster on Jan 23, 2011 14:46:21 GMT
Because he played very well there against Bolton and kept his place. It was the same with Tuncay, but I don't see any 'why does Tuncay get picked ahead of Ric' threads. Anyway, the real question is 'why was Wilson picked ahead of Delap in the centre, meaning that our best central midfielder was stuck out on the right?' Reason that Wilson's just about the only CM we have who can pass a football and the fact that our" best" CM could not pass wind is pretty bloody damning.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 23, 2011 14:51:06 GMT
I think, with regards to Delap playing at RM, Wilson and Whitehead are out best two CM, Ethers is out better winget IMO...Yesterday pitch size was crying out for, long throws...He neeeded to fit Delap in somewhere Whithead gives away a free kick virtually everytime he makes a challenge even when he's in tandem with another defensive midfielder like Rory. If he had to hold the middle with only occasional help from an attacking midfielder, he'd have to cover even more ground, as a result his challenges would be even more poorly timed (if thats possible) I suspect he'd see a lot of red cards. To play an attacking midfielder you need a midfield destroyer and contrary to what some on this board believe we haven't got one. Correct again Alster ... We need a top quality destroyer in the midfield (if we're going to start Matty & JP) before we can even begin to think about anything else happening in there. Once this player has been brought in, then we can think about bringing somebody in who is a little more cultured on the ball. To do it the other way round would be suicide or would at least mean that we're going to lose one of our wingers from the starting XI.
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Jan 23, 2011 14:55:47 GMT
Its simple - Pulis doesnt like to play Tuncay, Etherington and Pennant all together.
Pennant will start once the dream partnership of Carew and Jones is played.
|
|
|
Post by alster on Jan 23, 2011 15:09:35 GMT
Its simple - Pulis doesnt like to play Tuncay, Etherington and Pennant all together. Pennant will start once the dream partnership of Carew and Jones is played. The problem is the balance remains unaltered which means we are always a creative player short of what we need. Pennant Delap Whitehead Matty. Ric or Tunny with Jones or Carew is the best balance with the players we've got right now. Palacios and Wilson for Delap and Whitehead would balance up even better but we aint got Palacios and would Tone really dare play 3 offensive midfielders in his starting 11 anyway.
|
|
|
Post by miltonpotterfan on Jan 23, 2011 15:40:38 GMT
It's sad day when delap gets credited as being our best CM Yes, he's a legend, but after 2,5 years in the prem you would have thought we would brought in some much better CMs.
|
|
|
Post by finchy82 on Jan 23, 2011 16:25:02 GMT
id be tempted to play him as a right back.
|
|
|
Post by french toast on Jan 23, 2011 16:40:01 GMT
why are you using facts? i thought this thread was designed to slag pulis and his decision making off, facts are not allowed
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 23, 2011 17:20:07 GMT
why are you using facts? i thought this thread was designed to slag pulis and his decision making off, facts are not allowed Well he ain't going to get fit sitting on the bench is he?
|
|
|
Post by french toast on Jan 23, 2011 17:21:16 GMT
why are you using facts? i thought this thread was designed to slag pulis and his decision making off, facts are not allowed Well he ain't going to get fit sitting on the bench is he? it doesnt work like that though does it?
|
|
|
Post by mysteriojr on Jan 23, 2011 17:22:11 GMT
but carew whos played 70mins all season is?
|
|
|
Post by A-teen_six_T3 on Jan 23, 2011 17:22:52 GMT
why are you using facts? i thought this thread was designed to slag pulis and his decision making off, facts are not allowed Well he ain't going to get fit sitting on the bench is he? So you'd drop arguably our fitest player, ahead of someone who isn't fit
|
|
|
Post by Birchesheadpotter on Jan 23, 2011 17:23:33 GMT
why are you using facts? i thought this thread was designed to slag pulis and his decision making off, facts are not allowed Have you got some sort of problem? Genuine question.
|
|