|
Post by kevkj on Aug 26, 2010 11:46:34 GMT
Bentley or Jenas? which one of these would improve us the most,personally i think Bentley.
|
|
|
Post by stokelad84 on Aug 26, 2010 11:49:04 GMT
Bentley too in my opinion
|
|
|
Post by drwhom on Aug 26, 2010 11:59:20 GMT
Bentley every time. I think Jenas would be 100% better than what we've got but I think Bentley is the one with something to prove and he's still young enough to target the next round of internationals. Him and Ethers with KJ is shexy.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 26, 2010 12:02:46 GMT
I think Jenas would add more.
Bentley would be an upgrade on Lawrence, - more about delivery than pace or ability to beat his man - what we need is an Ethers equivalent for that flank, ideally.
I'd take both though, if they were available and willing to sign for us.
|
|
|
Post by ProudPotter17 on Aug 26, 2010 12:04:25 GMT
Jenas, our central midfeild is dire.
|
|
|
Post by apb1 on Aug 26, 2010 12:06:03 GMT
Jenas
Bentley seems a bit of a girl
|
|
|
Post by stevoyork on Aug 26, 2010 12:07:23 GMT
Bentley won't come up here (will Jenas even?), so it's irrelevant!
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Aug 26, 2010 12:08:13 GMT
I think it's a pretty close call on which one would improve us the most overall - we ideally could do with both.
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Aug 26, 2010 12:08:39 GMT
Both! but if I had to pick one then it would probably be Bentley, just to stop Pulis playing Delap on the right wing and actually have a recognised right winger there instead.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Aug 26, 2010 12:11:59 GMT
Bentley won't come up here (will Jenas even?), so it's irrelevant! I think at the start of this transfer window, most independant commentators would have suggested that there was no more chance of Kenwyne Jones joining us than Bentley or Jenas.
|
|
|
Post by Stokie in Geordieland on Aug 26, 2010 12:25:43 GMT
I'd got for Jenas, we desperately need to improve the central midfield area, having not done so since athe arrival of Whitehead, we need a more attacking option, a midfield dynamo that can seriously pass a ball.
What is the point of having two decent wingers of nobody can thread a ball through to them.
I also think Jenas has a better attitude to Bentley, which would fit in better with our overall approach.
|
|
|
Post by PoisonedDonkey on Aug 26, 2010 12:43:14 GMT
We won't get either, but I think Jenas would be better.
|
|
mikescfc19
Youth Player
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
If Carlsberg made lineswomen they'd be the best lineswomen in the world
Posts: 363
|
Post by mikescfc19 on Aug 26, 2010 13:05:39 GMT
both much much better than we currently have
|
|
coggy
Youth Player
![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png) ![*](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/stars/star.png)
Posts: 340
|
Post by coggy on Aug 26, 2010 13:14:59 GMT
Both !!!
|
|
|
Post by Block 22 on Aug 26, 2010 13:15:41 GMT
Either would do right now!
|
|
|
Post by roastcheese on Aug 26, 2010 13:58:12 GMT
My testicles just told me that Bentley and Jenas are both good players and would definately sign for Stoke.
But they are talking bollocks.
|
|
|
Post by Beebster on Aug 26, 2010 14:01:00 GMT
I'd like both but i see Jenas more likely to sign as he would cost less (transfer fee) but would still be on a huge pay package like Bentley would be.
|
|
|
Post by PoisonedDonkey on Aug 26, 2010 14:02:45 GMT
My testicles just told me that Bentley and Jenas are both good players and would definately sign for Stoke. But they are talking bollocks. ![::)](//storage.proboards.com/800541/images/cj7bsBj2jOTuEAUVaPt5.gif)
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Aug 26, 2010 14:07:11 GMT
I'd love Bentley but wouldn't want him to start at the expense of Walters, as that would mean Walters would skip ahead of Tuncay up front.
|
|