|
|
Post by ukstoke1 on Mar 20, 2008 16:58:58 GMT
Adam Vass is a target for WEST HAM this summer...  |
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Mar 20, 2008 17:00:36 GMT
Am I right in thinking the new West Ham Dir. of Football is the bloke who signed him for Brescia?
ukstoke, did he used to live with your parents?
|
|
|
|
Post by ukstoke1 on Mar 20, 2008 17:01:13 GMT
Yes..
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Mar 20, 2008 17:04:01 GMT
Have they paid us yet for him?
ps-where did You here this?
|
|
|
|
Post by ukstoke1 on Mar 20, 2008 17:05:40 GMT
He told me. He wouldn't lie either. Apparently the fee has not been agreed. That is not from him but from the Sentinel a few weeks back..
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Mar 20, 2008 17:07:11 GMT
There's nowt on me Hungarian site! I shall reserve judgement!
|
|
|
|
Post by Premiership Titanic Captain on Mar 20, 2008 17:07:50 GMT
It wouldn't surprise me.
I don't care what anyone says, but from someone who watched a WHOLE lot of academy and reserve team matches when Vass was on our books, we dropped a bollock letting him go. In fact, we dropped several in letting him go.
Vass & Whelan would of done us nicely.
|
|
|
|
Post by ukstoke1 on Mar 20, 2008 17:08:03 GMT
I dont think it is a firm bid.. He just said that he had been spoken 2 about it..
|
|
|
|
Post by CrazyPotter on Mar 20, 2008 17:09:11 GMT
Good player that Vass.
|
|
|
|
Post by ukstoke1 on Mar 20, 2008 17:10:04 GMT
I thought he was quality! Class above. Stoke tried to keep him on the cheap and lost out!
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Mar 20, 2008 17:11:07 GMT
What a terrible error we made with Vassy. It was clear to everyone that he was a tremendous talent.
Why we only offered him a professional contract until the end of the season I will never know. A very bad mistake
|
|
|
|
Post by ukstoke1 on Mar 20, 2008 17:12:52 GMT
and at a quarter of the wage that Rich De Laet is on...
|
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Mar 20, 2008 17:16:25 GMT
Didn't they send Agent Rudge over to Hungary to improve his handica I mean seal the deal?
|
|
|
|
Post by ukstoke1 on Mar 20, 2008 17:17:38 GMT
ha ha not sure
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Mar 20, 2008 20:23:40 GMT
Stoke made a point of stated they wanted to keep him.
if thats the case why not sign him back?
TP has been proved not to be the anti-christ but this was a mistake
|
|
