|
|
Post by lordeffinghamhunt on Mar 7, 2008 19:03:57 GMT
A rather exciting 3-2 defeat  |
|
|
|
Post by citytillidie08 on Mar 7, 2008 19:05:31 GMT
are you really a stoke fan
|
|
|
|
Post by lordeffinghamhunt on Mar 7, 2008 19:09:23 GMT
of coarse, but i am also a realist. there is nothing wrong with that is there?
|
|
|
|
Post by potters 22 on Mar 7, 2008 19:14:40 GMT
A realist? why would a realist say burnley would beat stoke?
|
|
|
|
Post by thewilse on Mar 7, 2008 19:15:14 GMT
4-1 to the Potters, fact.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pembo on Mar 7, 2008 19:18:20 GMT
I really cant see Burnley beating Stoke
A 2-0 score would do but same ole stoke we'll have to conceed so 2-1
|
|
|
|
Post by citytillidie08 on Mar 7, 2008 19:20:13 GMT
it should not be lordeffingham it should be effingidiot
|
|
|
|
Post by lordeffinghamhunt on Mar 7, 2008 19:24:51 GMT
One was right about Nugent. one will be right again about the score
|
|
|
|
Post by potters 22 on Mar 7, 2008 19:42:27 GMT
Lordeffingidiot why does a realist think burnley will beat stoke? ???
|
|
krazy
Youth Player
Posts: 359
|
Post by krazy on Mar 7, 2008 20:17:36 GMT
Want to see a 2-0 win for the Potters - Shawcross and Lawrence please ;D
However, Effy has a point! Anyone can beat anyone in this league so I dont see why a 2-1 defeat can't happen unfortunately.
Brave man to put a bet on it though
|
|
