|
|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 5, 2008 1:16:43 GMT
This would certainly freshen up the national game and leave the officials to concentrate on more important issues like serious foul play, bad language, and unsporting behaviour... If you don't like this idea ...well let's get back to the old offside rule as no bugger can understand the present one...It's far too ambiguous and open to argument and interpretation... In short a bloody nightmare..! ???  A shambles. |
|
|
|
Post by powchirper on Mar 5, 2008 1:28:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Mar 5, 2008 1:32:11 GMT
Jesus Christ....try analysing all that lot in 3 seconds and still have time to blow your whistle..! Alan Shearer and Alan Hansen are forever arguing over such off side decisons..to name but two..!  |
|
|
|
Post by powchirper on Mar 5, 2008 1:38:20 GMT
try explaining it to a woman or a yam-yam ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Mar 5, 2008 6:54:14 GMT
No just move the offside line up so teams can only play an offside game deep in their own territory , say the last 3rd of the pitch
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Mar 5, 2008 8:31:37 GMT
Did you hear the same question on radio 5 the other day as well?
|
|
|
|
Post by miffmister on Mar 5, 2008 9:26:57 GMT
Back to the old rule, if you stand in an offside pos youre off, none of this passive inpassive bollox!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by jacksscfc on Mar 5, 2008 9:36:58 GMT
Agree with Miffmister, go back to the old rule if you are in an offside position when the ball is played you are given offside whether you are interfering with play or not.
|
|
A shambles. 
