|
Post by stokerstayinup on Sept 12, 2009 22:36:46 GMT
Whatever formation any of us could of constructed wouldn't of mattered today(probably). Chelsea are a good team. However,I'm not happy. Talk about playing for a point,jeez.The 2nd half was painful. Why the fuck weren't Lawrence and Etherington in the starting line up? Most of us would expect Chelsea to beat us today,they're in a different league,but we conceded the game before the 1st whistle with our line up. How lucky do we need to be to not concede to 1 of the best teams in Europe? Seems like, with the big 4 ,quickly becoming the big 6,we're writing a 1/3rd of our games off.
|
|
|
Post by yorkpott on Sept 12, 2009 22:40:07 GMT
How did we"concede the game" we were winning!!
|
|
|
Post by anarchicalan on Sept 13, 2009 0:31:14 GMT
How did we"concede the game" we were winning!! ........ and yet, we didn't win ......
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 13, 2009 7:32:49 GMT
Two defeats to the tops sides isn't too bad however on both occasions TP has been to negative and not selected his best side,
|
|
|
Post by Inverness Stokie on Sept 13, 2009 9:50:16 GMT
Hopefully we will put out our best side against The Shit.
|
|
|
Post by Jimmy Cooper on Sept 13, 2009 9:59:33 GMT
Pulis's plan was to bring fuller, lawrence and etherington/tuncay on in the second half most probably. However, the injury to Sorro meant one of those couldn't happen, and Beats going off so soon meant Rick couldn't be his usual 'making defenders wish they'd never been born supersub'. In my opinion, the only mistake he made was bringing on Tuncay instead of Liam, who would have been more effecive in holding up play. Nothing against Tunchers, and hardly negativity from TP
|
|