|
|
Post by rambo61 on Aug 15, 2009 18:12:06 GMT
After todays match, who do we need more. Ashton,a player who reckons he deserves £50,000 a week whether he plays or not,or Kitson,aplayer who seems determined to show that Stoke weren,t wrong to sign him. Personally I think Kitson showed today what a good player he can be for us. A new signing without spending cash. As for Ashton ,fuck off you money grabbing wank stain!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Aug 15, 2009 18:13:10 GMT
Fuller
|
|
|
|
Post by stokecity1986 on Aug 15, 2009 18:13:58 GMT
Kitson and Fuller obviously march4  |
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Aug 15, 2009 18:14:53 GMT
Can we not have Ashton & Kitson then? |
|
|
|
Post by ashbournepotter on Aug 15, 2009 18:16:36 GMT
i really hope ashton doesn't sign
|
|
|
|
Post by Janet in ST5 on Aug 15, 2009 18:16:52 GMT
Kitson. Ashton's just an over paid lump of useless lard.
|
|
|
|
Post by Orbs on Aug 15, 2009 18:17:08 GMT
What about Beattie? |
|
|
|
Post by ti on Aug 15, 2009 18:22:19 GMT
with kitson apparently reformed, i'd rather us crack out coates' mystery sacks for a real pacey striker, vaughn for the future could be a good shout, but no one who we'd be able to attract springs to mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by rambo61 on Aug 15, 2009 18:26:31 GMT
The point I was trying to make was do we need to be held to ransom by Ashton when Kitson is prepared to fight for the team!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Janet in ST5 on Aug 15, 2009 18:29:29 GMT
The point I was trying to make was do we need to be held to ransom by Ashton when Kitson is prepared to fight for the team!! ....and I agree with you. I will be most disappointed if Ashton is one of the deals being nurtured by TP. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2009 20:04:01 GMT
Same here - if Ashton had wanted to come he wouldn't have messed us about so much.- don't want him at Stoke now. Kitson for me !
|
|
|
|
Post by kingdeano on Aug 15, 2009 20:06:57 GMT
The point I was trying to make was do we need to be held to ransom by Ashton when Kitson is prepared to fight for the team!! spot on that! hes rolled his sleeves up and decided give it a go, its took some guts after last year so fair play to him, tell ashton piss off, he prefers rot in reserves rather than play football and get into that england squad. |
|
|
|
Post by henry on Aug 15, 2009 20:11:04 GMT
its an interseting one, i wonder how ashton would feel about coming on and playing in midfield, especially when good old cresser is allowed to have his own way up front.
i'm begining to understand why we can't attract players, and its nowt to do with wages.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2009 20:11:25 GMT
Ashton is a better player.
If fully fit, I would have him with Rooney for England every time. Seriously.
|
|
|
|
Post by PotteringThrough on Aug 15, 2009 20:31:40 GMT
Ashton is a better player. If fully fit, I would have him with Rooney for England every time. Seriously. I'd agree with that entirely. If Ashton wasn't injured then he'd be a fantastic player to have. Unfortunately he is injury prone and the question for us is he worth the gamble? Personally i'd rather go after a pacy striker who can be a foil to Fuller. Kitson and Beattie are pretty similar and I think we need some back up to Fuller! If Ashton did sign though i'd be very happy with that. |
|
roma
Lads'n'Dads
Posts: 66
|
Post by roma on Aug 15, 2009 22:56:02 GMT
I think this depends on how much money we really have to spend. If its all going on Ashton then I would prefer Kitson and spend it on quality RB and creative CM. Just think what Fuller, Beattie and Kitson could do with the right supply.
|
|
|
|
Post by RMSCFC on Aug 15, 2009 22:57:35 GMT
Kitson
not unjury prone
plus less wages and maybe the better player ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by bostonstokie on Aug 15, 2009 23:00:05 GMT
IF IF IF he's fit, Ashton is England's best striker. Period.
(and why can't we have 'em both?)
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2009 23:02:12 GMT
No to Ashton.
We don't need him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Aug 15, 2009 23:19:13 GMT
Neither.
If Pulis fully intends to stick with the long ball with one striker expected to perform the 'Mama role' then he needs to think about somebody else completely.
IMHO neither Beattie, Kitson or Ashton are going to particularly happy or indeed particularly successful when asked to play this position.
|
|
|
|
Post by pushon on Aug 15, 2009 23:36:10 GMT
Neither. If Pulis fully intends to stick with the long ball with one striker expected to perform the 'Mama role' then he needs to think about somebody else completely. IMHO neither Beattie, Kitson or Ashton are going to particularly happy or indeed particularly successful when asked to play this position. Agreed, The player we really need is Kenwyn Jones |
|
|
|
Post by stokietickerz2 on Aug 16, 2009 0:07:37 GMT
what we really need is mama back
fit and ready to fight for his position
stokes system really works around sidibe and his abillity to bring the ball down hold it up and play another striker through on goal
end off!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Roy Cropper on Aug 16, 2009 0:21:14 GMT
Every seems to be forgetting Cresswell! He works aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaard' don't you know.
|
|
|
|
Post by staffordshireknot on Aug 16, 2009 8:25:05 GMT
After todays match, who do we need more. Ashton,a player who reckons he deserves £50,000 a week whether he plays or not,or Kitson,aplayer who seems determined to show that Stoke weren,t wrong to sign him. Personally I think Kitson showed today what a good player he can be for us. A new signing without spending cash. As for Ashton ,fuck off you money grabbing wank stain!!! ASHTONS NICKNAME IS SICKNOTE NEED I SAY ANYMORE. |
|
|
|
Post by staffordshireknot on Aug 16, 2009 8:26:42 GMT
I think this depends on how much money we really have to spend. If its all going on Ashton then I would prefer Kitson and spend it on quality RB and creative CM. Just think what Fuller, Beattie and Kitson could do with the right supply. We also have Sidbie as well. He proved alot of people wrong last season. |
|
|
|
Post by FrostySCFC on Aug 16, 2009 8:31:57 GMT
Thought Kits was alright today. Can't remember Beattie playing. Ashton would be nice, but it ain't going to happen, so let's move our thoughts onto getting another striker.
|
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Aug 16, 2009 8:35:32 GMT
Nice mini stepover to create his shot on goal and great to see the fans getting behind him I can see a new Kitson this year. It will be like signing a new player.
|
|
|
|
Post by fentonstokie1 on Aug 16, 2009 9:26:43 GMT
Has anyone else rushed in to sign Ashton? No not even Hull, so that tells you all you need to know.
I fail to see how Mama can get into the side once fit, but then I am conpletely gobsmacked every time I see Cresser come of the bench for his usual ineffective 10-15 mins.
I thought that Kitson looked determined to put last season behind him, what a f.cking pity that shot didn't go in off the bar, it was just the boost he needs, but it will come.
|
|
|
|
Post by gazXbrum on Aug 16, 2009 12:21:56 GMT
A straight choice then have Kitson. The club cant afford at this stage in the developement of the club as a whole, to be paying what would be good money (tranfer fee/wages etc) on 1 player who medically/physically you wont be sure will remain fit enough for half, 2/3rd of the season. Bit like filling yr car up with petrol then puncturing a small hole in the fuel tank for the fuel to slowly drain-out. Save the money for someone more reliable.
|
|
