|
Post by cousindupree on May 20, 2009 10:01:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2009 10:04:28 GMT
That's got to be a wind up surely. Fuck me, let's do away with the notion of winning and losing altogether and just have a panel of judges headed by Simon Cowell and that botox bint from Strictly Come Dancing award points for how many girly stepovers we see per game.
|
|
|
Post by Dr Oetcake on May 20, 2009 10:09:28 GMT
thats hilarious, that Frank Skinner, he's a genius...
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on May 20, 2009 10:10:13 GMT
Crock of shit. Perhaps he can inform us when footballing philosophy crosses over to derelict of duty?
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on May 20, 2009 10:11:40 GMT
winning football is sexy football TM
|
|
|
Post by stokelad84 on May 20, 2009 10:12:14 GMT
Does 'He stuck to his philospophy' really mean 'hes tactically inept and can only set up his team 1 way'
|
|
|
Post by cantspellwontspell on May 20, 2009 10:18:11 GMT
I think the advert says it all
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on May 20, 2009 10:26:34 GMT
I'm a simple soul. It seems to me that if winning the Championship was a good thing (and Mowbray certainly got plenty of praise for doing it) then finishing bottom of the Premiership is a bad thing. So Mowbray should, logically, be criticised for that.
I wonder what job description Club owners and Chairmen give to the managers they employ. I bet most say something like "get the best results and league position you can with the resources I give you". On that basis Mowbray's annual appraisal shouldn't make happy reading and won't be a patch on that of Pulis. I bet another thing in the job description is "put as many bums on seats as possible" on that basis also Mowbray has done a worse job than Pulis.
|
|
|
Post by RAF on May 20, 2009 10:33:30 GMT
I think it was summed up perfectly the other day on another thread. Some Baggies fan said the reason they were crap was because they played good football. You really couldn't make that kind of thing up! Moanbray by definition has been a failure this year, and it's getting up all the pundits and journos noses because after spunking over him all season he's made them look like twats! Simple
H
|
|
|
Post by miffmister on May 20, 2009 10:59:57 GMT
Its like a am golfer using a 7i,cuz hes seen Tiger Woods hit a perfect T shot 1 ft from the pin. He knows he is not as good as Tiger, and knows that if he used a 3 wood he may reach at least the green, but cuz Tiger uses a 7i, so will he. Result he will never hit the green with the 7i cuz he aint good enough, if he used the 3 wood he may not hit a hole in 1 but he will reach the green. I like Pulis approach shot and at least it gets us on the green. GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONN STOKE!!!
|
|
|
Post by lew86 on May 20, 2009 11:07:16 GMT
Does this weedy little fucker look like he's we'll informed? Everyone will miss the Baggies style of play six points.
|
|
|
Post by jorgieporgy on May 20, 2009 11:12:07 GMT
Mowbray - manager of the year, absolute nonsense What next Mowbray for the England Job I can understand to some extent the Hawthorns faithful supporting their manager. But comes a time when the question is - did he get the best possible outcome from the resources available? Bearing in mind that he had a big part in choosing those resources. Same goes for Southgate too - although they may still stay up.
|
|
|
Post by longwait on May 20, 2009 11:14:23 GMT
well ITK this poster is for fucks sake , how can he say Mowbray as manager of the year, he must be more blinkered than shergar and biased than fergie.
what a complete and utter arse , if id got more time and patience id join the forum and slate the fruitcake
|
|
|
Post by monkhousestokie on May 20, 2009 11:15:46 GMT
Mowbray has led the baggies to the bottom of the table and they're the first team to be relegated.
MASSIVE FAIL!!!
What a bell end.
|
|
|
Post by ted1965 on May 20, 2009 12:41:35 GMT
That is surely a spoof piece if it’s a serious article on why Mowbray should be named manager of the year it’s obviously written with the aid of designer drugs. He’s correct though if every one of the bottom 13 played football like Mowbray the Premiership would be exciting, every game would be like a park game that ends 0-0 after 60 shots on goal between them because none of those sides would be able to defend. But sadly they wouldn’t have forwards who could hit a cows backside with a banjo either.
Mowbray has proved he sticks to his principles because he is tactically inept and no other reason, it’s like the businessman who’s firm is going down the toilet, even though he can see it before his eyes he doesn’t have the intelligence to change his thinking because he is convinced he’s right no even when the receivers walk in the door and throw him out on his rear.
if being one dimensional and not knowing when to change qualifies you for manager of the year then Bravo Tony Mowbray you're a winner.
|
|
|
Post by Kenilworth_Stokies on May 20, 2009 12:54:22 GMT
Amazing. What possible definition of 'good football' includes failing to score and failing to defend.
I'm ace at sword swallowing, except for the actual swallowing of a sword bit.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on May 20, 2009 13:04:13 GMT
That has to be a wind up but it isn't, is it? Fool! When great football encompases being shit at attacking and defending then praise Mowbray, until then he's a idiotic Geordie that comprimise his "beliefs" for the good of the club he manages.
|
|
|
Post by lancer on May 20, 2009 13:31:23 GMT
I knew what to expect when I read, 'the top four are enshrined in their rightful places'. Well, it that's the case, the Baggies are intheir rightful place, aren't they? So based on that premise, efvery manager who takes his team down is entitles to be manager of the year.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2009 13:46:32 GMT
So KenilworthStokie, your good at swallowing, oh dear!
|
|
|
Post by anarchicalan on May 20, 2009 14:49:11 GMT
"37 games gone and seven of the ten places that count for anything in this season's Premier League have been decided; the top four are enshrined in their rightful positions; Everton and Aston Villa are guaranteed Europa League football and now just face a shoot-out for the 'Best of the Rest' title; and West Brom are down."
Just that bit alone makes my blood boil.
It shows how far the game has sunk when anything bar the "status quo" is considered anathema by the media.
|
|
|
Post by Mr.Pickles on May 20, 2009 15:00:44 GMT
Deep breaths.
No need to get wound up by it. Why do we have to throw a tantrum everytime someone writes something negative about us? The man is clearly ill so lets just leave him to it.
|
|
|
Post by barmystokie1 on May 20, 2009 15:46:14 GMT
that has to be the stupidist article I have ever seen in my life, I know everybody is entitled to their opinion, but that journalist if he showed it to his peers would be ridicled for absoulute rubbish
|
|
|
Post by cousindupree on May 20, 2009 16:16:02 GMT
I dont think many of us are getting wound up by the article Mr Pickles....its not much of an attack on the Potters. Why i just had to post it was that the piece could not be more bolloxed if he tried. We have seen plenty of poor lazy journalism over the last few months but this is out on its own for sheer unsupportable garbage and from a more 'serious' newspaper. If i was the sports editor of the paper I would have thrown the piece back at the journo and ask him for a sensible piece...jeez where are these journos recruited from?
|
|
|
Post by burberrybassist on May 20, 2009 16:25:13 GMT
Obviously a baggies fan, poor boy
|
|
|
Post by Davef on May 20, 2009 16:51:46 GMT
I was flicking through the channels just now and came across highlights of the West Brom v Arsenal game on Arsenal TV. I thought I'd watch it for five minutes and there was one spell of play when West Brom kept possession for quite a while, knocking the ball sideways and backwards until Brunt played a pass up the line which went out for a throw in. Riveting stuff.
|
|
|
Post by actongatestokie on May 20, 2009 17:24:24 GMT
Whether the pass is 5 yards, whether it's 10 yards, 50 yards or 500 yards. If it's losing football, its losing football.
And that aint ever pretty!
|
|