|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Apr 9, 2009 12:19:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by vestanpance on Apr 9, 2009 12:21:19 GMT
Bonus points for the undead one for his comment about putting a coat on. Brilliant  |
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Apr 9, 2009 12:24:25 GMT
So what about all those people claiming that we didn't pay anything remotely like 5.5 million for Kitson and that a huge amount of that figure was only to be paid depending on appearances/goals/our premiership survival?
|
|
|
|
Post by monkeycat on Apr 9, 2009 12:25:33 GMT
and half a million fee for his loan
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Apr 9, 2009 12:28:50 GMT
Looks like it will be through the play-offs. Big game at home to Sheffield United tomorrow. Come on you Royals!!
|
|
|
|
Post by stayingupforbigbazza on Apr 9, 2009 12:30:47 GMT
This was on Radio Stoke yesterday morning
|
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Apr 9, 2009 12:31:49 GMT
Well clearly not everyone heard it!
H
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Apr 9, 2009 12:32:29 GMT
Trouble is they won't come back up.
|
|
|
|
Post by monkeycat on Apr 9, 2009 12:36:50 GMT
The fee was agreed before Kitson went to them on loan
|
|
|
|
Post by stayingupforbigbazza on Apr 9, 2009 12:44:45 GMT
Trouble is they won't come back up. I don't think they'll go up either especially with Lethal Dave in attack But hope they do obviously |
|
|
|
Post by mrpickles on Apr 9, 2009 12:47:06 GMT
bloody hell, readings pants are well and truly down with that fee aint they?  . Mind you in hindsight so were ours with the initial fee  |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2009 12:51:05 GMT
Assuming they are promoted but he does fuck all for them, there's no chance they could renege on the deal like Newcastle alleged that we did with Ameobi is there?
|
|
|
|
Post by MrDBrent on Apr 9, 2009 12:51:40 GMT
comon the royals!
|
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stokie on Apr 9, 2009 13:05:23 GMT
That would be an excellent return for us, hopefully they come up but i could see them missing out unfortunately
|
|
|
|
Post by DelapsWankingArm on Apr 9, 2009 13:09:32 GMT
come on reading!! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Bick on Apr 9, 2009 13:34:32 GMT
well if we can recoup or money and spend it elsewhere, all the better.
|
|
|
|
Post by edouardlapaglie on Apr 9, 2009 14:53:11 GMT
This means wanting Reading to go up when i don't like them, what a piccallili
|
|
|
|
Post by cantspellwontspell on Apr 9, 2009 14:58:36 GMT
So what about all those people claiming that we didn't pay anything remotely like 5.5 million for Kitson and that a huge amount of that figure was only to be paid depending on appearances/goals/our premiership survival? because this fee, just like the one we paid, almost certainly contains lots of clauses (and probably the £500K estimated loan fee) |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Apr 9, 2009 15:29:31 GMT
no the £4.8m fee is separate to the £500k loan fee
we didnt pay £5.5m & Reading wont be paying £4.8m
we would have paid £5.5m if he had played x number of games & scored x number of goals over x amount of time (!).
these figures are 'headline' figures & although not b/s they are misleading.
effectively if Reading go up we will have lost less than £500k.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Apr 9, 2009 15:33:47 GMT
no the £4.8m fee is separate to the £500k loan fee we didnt pay £5.5m & Reading wont be paying £4.8m we would have paid £5.5m if he had played x number of games & scored x number of goals over x amount of time (!). these figures are 'headline' figures & although not b/s they are misleading. effectively if Reading go up we will have lost less than £500k. Obviously you have heard the same figures as me, lordb. But RAF doesn't belive our version! ;D |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Apr 9, 2009 15:37:30 GMT
yes
of course its just what I was told - I wasnt present at the negotiations of anything....
anyway t'is no big deal really.
|
|
|
|
Post by th05 on Apr 9, 2009 17:00:41 GMT
If that happens its fantastic business.
|
|
|
|
Post by Block 26 on Apr 9, 2009 17:06:11 GMT
COME ON YOU R'SSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
|
|
|
|
Post by stonestokie! on Apr 9, 2009 17:08:13 GMT
come on reading!  |
|
|
|
Post by walrus on Apr 9, 2009 17:08:25 GMT
I didn't want them to get up, but I certainly do now. It would be almost worth £700,000 for keeping Ricci on his toes for a few months.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mozzaa on Apr 9, 2009 18:05:56 GMT
If Carlsberg Did Us Favours... lol
|
|
|
|
Post by boothenender on Apr 10, 2009 14:40:19 GMT
the term "DEAD WOOD" springs to mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by truckerged on Apr 10, 2009 14:48:09 GMT
it doesnt matter either way now its history everyclub that buys players has success and failures its how you come out of it at the end of the season that counts and at the moment i would say were ahead
so for tp,s transfer activity i give a thumbs up
|
|
. Mind you in hindsight so were ours with the initial fee 
