|
|
Post by LGH87 on Apr 9, 2009 10:36:36 GMT
Its time to solve the debate that divides us stokies right down the middle....who was shitter:
Lethal Keith or Vinny (i used to play for juventus) Pericard ???
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Apr 9, 2009 10:39:12 GMT
God save me, Keith Scott- what a shower of shite he was. However, he was involved in the deal that brought Sheron here.
For me, because of his 'pedigree', Vince is worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by cartwright4 on Apr 9, 2009 10:45:02 GMT
Lethal Keith is the worst I've ever seen. I remember one chance he had in front of the Boothen, 1 yard out, right under the goal and he managed to kick it backwards?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Stephen Frys' Ring on Apr 9, 2009 10:47:43 GMT
This is a Mass-debate   i do not wish to get involved in,because i actually don't think either were the shittest we have had........... ......O'Neill Donaldson Jorge Andrade Rowson.....the list is too much for a 36yr old who suffered at the hands of much shitness in the nineties. But we're fookin good now,at last my friends we have stuck by them and now we are going to reap the benefits,i sense a cup next season.......... what,come on just the Carling Cup will do for now   |
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Apr 9, 2009 10:52:27 GMT
Gabbiadini was also a load of bollocks for us.
|
|
|
|
Post by ted1965 on Apr 9, 2009 10:52:30 GMT
I am convinced Keith Scott was so poor he actually came out of his mothers ass as he missed the other opening by a mile.
|
|
|
|
Post by wembley4372 on Apr 9, 2009 10:54:34 GMT
Good goal a Luton though.
|
|
|
|
Post by vestanpance on Apr 9, 2009 10:55:48 GMT
Scott was a much worse player.
Anyone who thinks that Pericard is the owrst we've had clearly cannot remember such footballing luminaries as a three stone overweight Gary Bannister, Marco Gabbiadini or my own personal favourite, Paul fucking Stewart.
In the third tier, Pericard would probably hold his own, which is more than can be said for some of the litany of shite we've had over the years, including lethal Keith who, lest we forget, cost us £300,000 at a time when that wasn't peanuts.
|
|
|
|
Post by wembley4372 on Apr 9, 2009 11:00:21 GMT
Scott never did learn the offside rule!
|
|
|
|
Post by cartwright4 on Apr 9, 2009 11:05:54 GMT
Bannister was certainly the slowest - watching him turn was like watching the QE2 perform a 3 point turn in a sea of thick treacle.
|
|
|
|
Post by OldStokie on Apr 9, 2009 11:09:21 GMT
A litany of terrible players would fill a very big page for me. However, both Lethal Keith and Vincent would come near the bottom of the list. The worst of the two? I'd plump for Pericard. At least Lethal Keith tried to be wank. Vincent couldn't even be bothered to do that.  OS. |
|
|
|
Post by rorymscfc on Apr 9, 2009 11:09:45 GMT
Paul Stewart did score the winner at Boro though.
RoryM
|
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Apr 9, 2009 11:14:01 GMT
Periwinkle is by far the worst, he's a lazy greedy shitehawk.
At least we got Sheron for Lethal Keith.
We got 2.75 mill off QPR for Sheron after an initial investment of 300K for Lethal Keith. Bargain.
We'll be lucky to get 10 B+H for that feckless fucker Pericunt.
H
|
|
|
|
Post by Stephen Frys' Ring on Apr 9, 2009 11:17:02 GMT
I am convinced Keith Scott was so poor he actually came out of his mothers ass as he missed the other opening by a mile. ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D I thank you Ted,it's taken me 5 mins to write this due to laughter and tears 2nd place to OS's At least Keith tried to be wank remark And 3rd to Bannister = QE2 3 point turn quip. Off to work now chaps, mail don't collect itself ( wow what a great world that would be ) As ever keep the humour coming ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D |
|
|
|
Post by vanderlow on Apr 9, 2009 12:04:16 GMT
If anyone sore pericard at hartlepool away, he was awful he couldn't even jump properly whats that all about
|
|
|
|
Post by assessornum1 on Apr 9, 2009 12:18:50 GMT
Probably six grand a week ffs
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Apr 9, 2009 12:22:28 GMT
1) Lethal Keith.
2) Pericard.
3) Bannister.
|
|
|
|
Post by stayingupforbigbazza on Apr 9, 2009 12:28:03 GMT
If its boxing def lethal Keith
but then again RSF due to both unable to land a punch
;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Apr 9, 2009 12:28:18 GMT
Hannes Sigurdsson?
David Xausa?
|
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Apr 9, 2009 12:29:57 GMT
The original question was who is the shitter Keith Scott or Periwinkle.
Not who is the worst player ever to play for Stoke.
H
|
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Apr 9, 2009 12:32:05 GMT
The original question was who is the shitter Keith Scott or Periwinkle. Not who is the worst player ever to play for Stoke. H Sorry for speaking fella! Just was thinking of other shite we had play for us. Therefore to answer the original question, I'd g for Lethal Keith as I saw Periwinkle hit a blinder against Soton pre-season, so at least he managed to hit the net |
|
|
|
Post by RAF on Apr 9, 2009 12:33:12 GMT
It wasn't directed at you as it goes it was directed at Vestans comment
Maybe I should have been a bit clearer
H
|
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Apr 9, 2009 12:35:29 GMT
It wasn't directed at you as it goes it was directed at Vestans comment Maybe I should have been a bit clearer H No problem, I misread it then as well, as my comment was similiar to Vestans. Peace. |
|
|
|
Post by euan ouzami on Apr 9, 2009 13:08:20 GMT
I'd have to sit on the fence and go for a draw (0-0)
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Apr 9, 2009 15:48:47 GMT
I actually think Vince is worse than Keith Scott - very close call though
Bamber was worse than the pair of them
Bannister was indeed slower than any other Stoke player bar Brian Rice however he did once score from the half way line (at the Vic,cant remember who against).
Bannister should be filed under excellent players who were past it/wank by the time Stoke signed them along with Gabbiadini,Statham,Worthington,Southall e.t.c.
|
|
i do not wish to get involved in,because i actually don't think either were the shittest we have had...........
1
