|
|
Post by campania on Apr 9, 2009 1:05:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jbstokie on Apr 9, 2009 1:27:57 GMT
Sad fuckers  |
|
|
|
Post by eddy_under_fire'sviews on Apr 9, 2009 1:51:57 GMT
we were still only 3 points away from being out of it. couldn't give a rats arse
|
|
|
|
Post by Ron Jeremy on Apr 9, 2009 1:52:20 GMT
Least were not bottom  |
|
|
|
Post by Malex on Apr 9, 2009 2:27:53 GMT
I actually like the idea but it's hugely flawed. You can't just re-write history, change one little thing and assume everything else would have stayed the same afterwards.
|
|
|
|
Post by kidsgrove4 on Apr 9, 2009 3:37:30 GMT
cockjockeys. I agree with Malex. it's just re-writing history.
I love being a Stokie and proving people wrong. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by StoKeith on Apr 9, 2009 5:44:29 GMT
Someone has commented on there (on the Stoke - Portsmouth match) that Rooney and Ronaldo should have both seen red (and also therefore Wilko would not have seen red) - how would that have affected the result??? If they can't alter scores for decisions like that (clearly impossible) then they're obviously only analysing a small percentage of decisions - those that directly result in a goal / disallowed goal - so many other incorrect decisions affect the game that no-one can predict what would have happened!
The concept has so many flaws it's embarrassing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Apr 9, 2009 6:21:32 GMT
Someone has commented on there (on the Stoke - Portsmouth match) that Rooney and Ronaldo should have both seen red (and also therefore Wilko would not have seen red) - how would that have affected the result??? If they can't alter scores for decisions like that (clearly impossible) then they're obviously only analysing a small percentage of decisions - those that directly result in a goal / disallowed goal - so many other incorrect decisions affect the game that no-one can predict what would have happened! The concept has so many flaws it's embarrassing. I didn't even know that Ronaldo and Rooney played in the Stoke - Portsmouth match! Which side were they playing for? ;D |
|
|
|
Post by stokebill on Apr 9, 2009 6:42:51 GMT
Interesting, but obviously totally flawed. Barely a match goes by without a game changing decision being made. Rooney, Ronaldo, Wright-Phillips, selecting Pericard...
|
|
|
|
Post by Baggs on Apr 9, 2009 7:54:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on Apr 9, 2009 7:59:43 GMT
Looking through them,How can Lee Mason be able to officiate any Hull games considering his brother played for them?
|
|
|
|
Post by tuum on Apr 9, 2009 8:38:43 GMT
Inconsistent in their objectivity.
Stated that Fulham should have had a penalty when Higgy handled the ball from the cross (when he went to head the ball near the penalty spot and the ball hit his hand and went behind him for a corner). This was completely innocent and totally accidental.
Last week they seem to think that the penalty awarded against Blackburn in their game against Spurs was wholly innocent and should never have been given.
Despite the fact that he was 8-10 yds from the ball and had a fair opportunity to move his arm out of the way. Griff's penalty decision v derby was much harsher than the Blackburn one.
As stated above, they only deal in the bleedin obvious and then not very objectively so the table is pretty meaningless - good for a heated debate down the pub if you are that way inclined.
|
|
|
|
Post by StoKeith on Apr 9, 2009 15:57:07 GMT
Someone has commented on there (on the Stoke - Portsmouth match) that Rooney and Ronaldo should have both seen red (and also therefore Wilko would not have seen red) - how would that have affected the result??? If they can't alter scores for decisions like that (clearly impossible) then they're obviously only analysing a small percentage of decisions - those that directly result in a goal / disallowed goal - so many other incorrect decisions affect the game that no-one can predict what would have happened! The concept has so many flaws it's embarrassing. I didn't even know that Ronaldo and Rooney played in the Stoke - Portsmouth match! Which side were they playing for? ;D Ah, I mean the comment was made under the article about the Stoke - Portsmouth game. The bloke commenting decided to have a general rant. |
|
