|
|
Post by prem4stoke on Apr 7, 2009 15:50:51 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by burtonstokie on Apr 7, 2009 15:55:24 GMT
Biggest load of crap I've ever seen. If someone is denied a penalty that should have been one, then how do they know if he'd have scored?
|
|
|
|
Post by prem4stoke on Apr 7, 2009 15:57:33 GMT
Biggest load of crap I've ever seen. If someone is denied a penalty that should have been one, then how do they know if he'd have scored? Exactly what I said to my mate. Also it would change the pattern of the game without doubt  |
|
|
|
Post by wembley4372 on Apr 7, 2009 16:00:32 GMT
I don't suppose they can work out how manure would have played with nine men.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baggs on Apr 7, 2009 16:56:23 GMT
Or how Man citeh would have played when SWP was sent off at the same time as Rory.
for this to be accurate you would have to look at every marginal offside, every tackle, the positioning of the ball and the wall at every free kick, every deflection that went out for a throw. You would need to look at replays for every angle and then assign a probability of your certainty that you are 'right'.
Then you would need to assign a probability to the chance of a team scoring a goal from the resulting righted injustice.
And once you do that you no longer get to the 'right result', because you've introduced subjectivity, which is why the 'injustices' occurred in the first place - thanks to the ref's subjectivity.
Jeff Winter has a similar piece of cack on his site - I took him to task about it and he never responded. Fat cnut
|
|
|
|
Post by Baggs on Apr 7, 2009 17:01:01 GMT
Right Result rules
what a load of cock
1) Penalties adjudged to have been given are assumed to be scored (as penalty takers fail to score from less than a quarter of kicks taken in the Premiership).
less than a quarter - so 20%? 1 in 5? that's still quite a few
2) Where an indirect free kick should have been given inside the penalty area to the attacking side, it is assumed to be missed.
Like Ronaldo's on Sunday?
3) Score changes are related to specific decisions only (e.g. a red card for a player does not change the score - even if the player who scores should not have been on the pitch at the time.)
lol the "right result" is that he should have been sent off in the 30th minute - then he popped up to score the game's only goal in the 77th.
4) If a free kick or a corner is wrongly awarded to a team and that team scores from it (or in the move that started from the free kick or corner) the goal will be disallowed.
5) If a free kick or a corner is wrongly not given to a team and the opposing team scores or is awarded a penalty in the same move, the goal or the penalty will be disallowed.
6) Rules 4 & 5 do not apply to situations where a team should have been awarded a penalty or not had a goal disallowed in the previous move. These free kicks or corners are regarded as legitimate.
I don't even understand 5 or 6. But I don't know of many moves where u get a peno shout turned down and then the oppo score
Just sums up, it's basically a random number generator. Terrible
|
|
|
|
Post by One-Two on Apr 7, 2009 17:03:05 GMT
a penalty doesn't only alter the score, it changes the way the game pans out afterwards, so this is impossible to work out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2009 17:09:15 GMT
Strange. I went through precisely the same process that they say they have been through and we should be top by ten clear points.
|
|
|
|
Post by Baggs on Apr 7, 2009 17:11:03 GMT
lol
to only have 6 rules to determine this just shows what a bunch of cowboys they are
|
|
|
|
Post by Neckend Potter on Apr 7, 2009 17:15:28 GMT
What a load of dog shit. Theres 4 minutes I'll never get back.
|
|
|
|
Post by trend....... on Apr 7, 2009 17:16:51 GMT
Complete and utter load of a wank!
|
|
|
|
Post by LDE76 on Apr 7, 2009 17:23:41 GMT
It's as pointless as it is flawed. Complete and utter waste of time.
|
|
|
|
Post by lancer on Apr 7, 2009 17:35:41 GMT
They're going to have us at the bottom, no matter how the hell they do it. Still,'ne'er mind,eh?'
|
|
