|
|
Post by knowingeye on Jan 30, 2008 15:10:14 GMT
This will shock you
|
|
|
|
Post by visunitafortior on Jan 30, 2008 15:22:34 GMT
makes a mockery of the American legal system. Land of the free my arse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lawto on Jan 30, 2008 15:35:21 GMT
The Clintons corrupt as fuck?? Surely not! Let's hope America sees sense and chooses Obama.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr Jon on Jan 30, 2008 15:42:04 GMT
She already has many questions surrounding her integrity and suitability for presidency left unanswered from well before her senator days.
I never trusted her husband either when he was president......in common with most politicians come to think of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Onneravineet on Jan 30, 2008 15:43:51 GMT
mmm.. they've got a decent record of seeing sense haven't they!
Look at the George Bush... oh wait a minute!
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead. Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas."
George W. Bush, on the former South African president, who is still very much alive, Washington, D.C., Sept. 20, 2007
|
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Jan 30, 2008 15:53:13 GMT
Both parties are different sides of the same coin, Obama is in the pocket of AIPAC so nothings going to change with regards the Israel/Palestine issue under him, Israel will continue with there atrocities, he also has Zebrignew Brezinski as a foreign policy advisor, the man who brought you an early version of Al Qeada in Afghanistan and who now brags about sucking Russia into "the Afghan trap" during the early 80's, that war killed hundreds of thousands and possibly millions, he's the democrat version of Henry Kissinger. Obama is also a member of the council on foreign relations, who's other members include Dick Cheney and other members of the neo-con war party. The only one who isn't bought and paid for is Ron Paul, but he has no chance of winning- video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=17695111997407981&q=Terrorism%3A+Ron+Paul+vs.+Giuliani+%40+SC+Debate&total=2&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0Hillary Clinton is the chosen one and will be the next president, they'll put her up against a dead horse like John 'madman' McCain and she'll trounce him, the guy is going around saying he'd keep troops in Iraq for 100 years, a bad move when polls show 70-80% of Americans want out of the meat grinder that is Iraq. |
|
|
|
Post by Lawto on Jan 30, 2008 16:20:15 GMT
Serpico,
Do you work for CNN?
|
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Jan 30, 2008 16:28:12 GMT
Serpico, Do you work for CNN? No, and they wouldn't allow me to because what i just said is the truth, something CNN and other corporate owned media networks don't allow. That and I'm not clever enough  |
|
|
|
Post by knowingeye on Jan 30, 2008 19:53:49 GMT
Serpico, Watch out for the men in black! (Not the refs!)
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Jan 30, 2008 20:20:50 GMT
"I heard somebody say, 'Where's Mandela?' Well, Mandela's dead. Because Saddam killed all the Mandelas." George W. Bush, on the former South African president, who is still very much alive, Washington, D.C., Sept. 20, 2007 Far be it from me to defend Bush, but I think what he was trying to say was that in Iraq, there was nobody to stand up to the régime in place like Mandela did in South Africa because Saddam found that the easiest way to deal with them was to kill them. He wasn't trying to say that there'd been a bomb at the Mandela family reunion. Serpico, have you been watching them damn videos on YouTube showing Ron Paul's interview on CNN and the headlines flashing behind us telling us that he's about to have his plane crashed into the sea? |
|
|
|
Post by knowingeye on Jan 30, 2008 20:36:07 GMT
Strange air crashes that erase evidence, now there's a thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Jan 30, 2008 20:45:00 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Olgrligm on Jan 30, 2008 21:29:40 GMT
What motive would The Times have to expose 'the truth'? I thought Murdoch was a bit pally with both our government and theirs?
|
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Jan 30, 2008 21:43:35 GMT
What motive would The Times have to expose 'the truth'? I thought Murdoch was a bit pally with both our government and theirs? Thats a good point, and i thought someone would bring up the Murdoch angle to try and debunk it, the answer is i have no idea why he'd let it in, I have heard that he's a lot more relaxed about the times and he's more hands on in other publications. The question is why is she the most gagged person in US history if what she has to say is not true ? i mean there actions make you think that she has something to say that they don't want people hearing ? The anonymous "state department officials" name is Marc Grossman, google his name , it seems all this ties in with the scandal about the outing of a CIA agent, Valarie Plame. If this story is true and officials working for the US government have been selling nuclear secretes on the black market then this is going to be a huge story, it would probably dwarf Iran contra and other scandals, people would be brought up on possible charges of treason. |
|
