|
|
Post by salopstick on Mar 13, 2009 23:58:44 GMT
does that mean a great team selection tomorrow
|
|
|
|
Post by BiddulphStokie on Mar 13, 2009 23:59:05 GMT
no probably not
|
|
|
|
Post by One-Two on Mar 14, 2009 0:00:51 GMT
possibly, i hope so
|
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Mar 14, 2009 0:04:25 GMT
No - by saying he got it wrong at Villa, he was essentially saying he got it right in all of the other games where he played the standard away formation. He might be right about that, time will tell.
|
|
|
|
Post by Titan Uranus on Mar 14, 2009 0:17:06 GMT
Tony is a tactical genius and anybody who disagrees should fuck off up the Vale.
The team he selects tomorrow is good enough for me (as long as it doesn't include Cresswell and Pericard )
He's going to outhink Moyes tomorrow....
defend for 70 mins
concede a goal
bring on Fuller and Camara
Shawcross and Fuller score 75 and 85
brilliant
|
|
|
|
Post by stokelad84 on Mar 14, 2009 0:19:36 GMT
it doesnt matter who we start with and finish with as long as it works and we get a result!
|
|
|
|
Post by Soi Cowboy on Mar 14, 2009 0:38:20 GMT
To be honest thought he was referring to the wing back idea when he said he got it wrong. Everton give sod all away and look powderpuff up front.
3-2 to us then :-)
|
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Mar 14, 2009 0:40:41 GMT
Tony seemed to suggest he got it wrong at Villa by setting his team up to be too attacking.
This would imply that the team tomorrow will be more defensive than the Villa game.
I use the words seem and imply because I'm not really sure I quite believe it, but that's what he seemed to suggest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Soi Cowboy on Mar 14, 2009 0:47:35 GMT
I expect same team started v Bolton with Fuller and Etherington on the bench.
I'm sure the chaos that Rory caused them will mean a start for Mama
|
|
