|
|
Post by rawli on Mar 6, 2009 11:35:39 GMT
How many more points do you think we'd have if we'd have had Beattie all season?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pedropotter on Mar 6, 2009 11:36:29 GMT
We would have been sandwiched neatly between Villa and the Arse. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Mar 6, 2009 11:38:50 GMT
Does 'sandwiched between the Arse' belong on the brown wings thread?
|
|
|
|
Post by craig1974 on Mar 6, 2009 11:39:39 GMT
We will never know the answer to that question, but we did reach 12th place in November without him.
|
|
|
|
Post by glouscesterstokie on Mar 6, 2009 11:45:29 GMT
we would have been top ofcourse =)
|
|
|
|
Post by markscfc72 on Mar 6, 2009 11:46:58 GMT
well we wouldnt be worrying about relegation now, es pecially if we had Etherington as well from the start
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Mar 6, 2009 12:15:07 GMT
It's interesting that we've managed to score six goals despite Etherington's absence. At any level, that is a fair return!
Just goes to show that, despite his class, we do have capable cover across the team. That said, I can't wait for his return (hopefully for all ten games)!
|
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Mar 6, 2009 12:19:37 GMT
Or worringly how many points would we now have if we hadn't signed Beattie at all?  |
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Mar 6, 2009 12:20:25 GMT
Thankfully, that is hypothetical  |
|
|
|
Post by skiptanbroonacari on Mar 6, 2009 13:38:36 GMT
Beats has played extremely well and is in excellent form.
Would he have kept it up for the whole season, especially if he had been expected to play the "Mama role" in the way Kitson was early season? Maybe we'd be looking at Beattie not making the bench while a recently recruited ginger ninja was banging 'em in.
|
|
