|
|
Post by spitthedog on Feb 13, 2009 12:11:39 GMT
says Cresswell has got to score if he keeps on playing him.
|
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Feb 13, 2009 12:15:40 GMT
Law of Average Players says not, even if he plays til he's 65.
|
|
|
|
Post by imallstokedup on Feb 13, 2009 12:16:49 GMT
says Cresswell has got to score if he keeps on playing him. Some would argue that goal will be in the Championship !! |
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Feb 13, 2009 12:17:30 GMT
The law of large numbers (LLN) is a theorem in probability that describes the long-term stability of the mean of a random variable. Given a random variable with a finite expected value, if its values are repeatedly sampled, as the number of these observations increases, their mean will tend to approach and stay close to the expected value. in other words a rare occurrence will happen given enough time  Come on Cressie!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by th05 on Feb 13, 2009 12:17:59 GMT
;D He did have a nack of nicking a few in the Championship. He is just not up to the prem, fair play to the guy, puts in his all for SCFC.
|
|
|
|
Post by scfclifer on Feb 13, 2009 12:18:06 GMT
no chance he will not get a better opportunity than he got against the shit and he row 35'd that fucker
|
|
|
|
Post by th05 on Feb 13, 2009 12:23:31 GMT
no chance he will not get a better opportunity than he got against the shit and he row 35'd that fucker Wasn't that Fulham? |
|
|
|
Post by PickSCFC on Feb 13, 2009 12:24:11 GMT
he should of scored against fulham
|
|
|
|
Post by miffmister on Feb 13, 2009 12:29:52 GMT
Creswell could't score with my lady nevermind in the prem!!! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by eriksson74 on Feb 13, 2009 12:56:03 GMT
He should have scored at Sunderland (when he swiped and missed the ball) before Camera rattled the ball. Strange how Tone focussd on how Camera would never have a better chance to get off the mark and dismised the opportunity for Cresser!
|
|
|
|
Post by scfclifer on Feb 13, 2009 12:59:17 GMT
no chance he will not get a better opportunity than he got against the shit and he row 35'd that fucker Wasn't that Fulham? no the shit in front of the boothen |
|
|
|
Post by y_oh_y_delilah on Feb 13, 2009 13:16:25 GMT
Cresswell contributes nothing and he will never score a goal in the Premier League as long as he's got a hole in his arse.
All this crap about him working hard and running around like a headless chicken means f... all, when the net result is f... all.
FFS, he's paid c £10 grand a week for keeping fit and running around a lot.
Any takers for the next available position for that role at the club?
|
|
|
|
Post by Ron Jeremy on Feb 13, 2009 13:16:38 GMT
Law of averages says that TP will giv somebody else a chance instead of cresswell  |
|
|
|
Post by spartanstokie on Feb 13, 2009 13:29:32 GMT
i really think he will bench him this next game
|
|
|
|
Post by eriksson74 on Feb 13, 2009 13:46:40 GMT
Cresswell contributes nothing and he will never score a goal in the Premier League as long as he's got a hole in his arse. All this crap about him working hard and running around like a headless chicken means f... all, when the net result is f... all. FFS, he's paid c £10 grand a week for keeping fit and running around a lot. Any takers for the next available position for that role at the club? £10k or £19k still f...ing scandelous for what he gives back to the side |
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Feb 13, 2009 14:43:30 GMT
Well the law of diminishing returns doesn't apply here as there would have had to be a return to begin with to diminish  |
|
|
|
Post by Tubes on Feb 13, 2009 14:53:31 GMT
The law of large numbers (LLN) is a theorem in probability that describes the long-term stability of the mean of a random variable. Given a random variable with a finite expected value, if its values are repeatedly sampled, as the number of these observations increases, their mean will tend to approach and stay close to the expected value. in other words a rare occurrence will happen given enough time Come on Cressie!!!!!!!!!!! Think I'd rather wait for my typewriting monkey to produce Shakespeare ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Malex on Feb 13, 2009 14:54:29 GMT
Well the law of diminishing returns doesn't apply here as there would have had to be a return to begin with to diminish Law of diminishing returns states that for more of one factor added to another there will be an increase in return until a set level whereby it will start to diminish. If you see Cresswell as the constant, pitch time as the variable and goals as the return, then we have already seen the return from him which has been diminishing since the end of last season |
|
|
|
Post by fortbrittania on Feb 13, 2009 15:05:23 GMT
If he hasn't scored yet this season, then then his average goals is 0 per match, so why is he expected to score in terms of averages... when his average is 0?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Feb 13, 2009 15:23:06 GMT
If he hasn't scored yet this season, then then his average goals is 0 per match, so why is he expected to score in terms of averages... when his average is 0? The ratio of shots on target: goals scored. On average one in every nine shots results in a goal per season. |
|
|
|
Post by Bick on Feb 13, 2009 16:32:36 GMT
Law of averages tends to work with random things. If you left a chicken in a kitchen, the law of average doesn't suggest that he'd ever cook me a full english.
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Feb 13, 2009 17:00:09 GMT
says Cresswell has got to score if he keeps on playing him. Some would argue that goal will be in the Championship !! it will be if he keeps getting picked |
|
|
|
Post by slangking on Feb 13, 2009 19:02:44 GMT
Had a spectacular overhead kick that just missed at Sunderland.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Feb 13, 2009 19:05:23 GMT
If he hasn't scored yet this season, then then his average goals is 0 per match, so why is he expected to score in terms of averages... when his average is 0? He has scored this season. 26th August 2008, second goal away at Cheltenham in League Cup. |
|
