|
|
Post by fca47 on Feb 6, 2009 8:22:09 GMT
with bringing the game into disrepute? for telling lies. In his interview he is saying Shite-Philips kick was a natural reaction to being kicked twice from behind. Exactly when was he kicked from behind, the first was a trip and the second was kicking the ball at him, how does that excuse him kicking Delap. Find it strange that all these channels allow him to peddle this claptrap.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Feb 6, 2009 8:25:30 GMT
no,he wasnt lying - imho - just telling how he saw it
everyone is entitled to be wrong
|
|
|
|
Post by Baggs on Feb 6, 2009 8:25:44 GMT
He could certainly be charged for calling one of our ballboys a 'fucking prick' - can't be arsed to report it though
|
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Feb 6, 2009 8:31:22 GMT
Obviously he will have a different view, he's defending his player. He is a man under a lot of pressure and SWP is one of his best players.
Still has no arguement though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Soi Cowboy on Feb 6, 2009 9:50:46 GMT
Mark Hughes always had a tough guy but fair image and kind of liked him for that. He's bound to stick up for his player but can't argue with SWP being charged- is clear to see what he did.
Loved that moment at Chelsea when he was pissing about with the ball when Wallace clattered him and fed Pesch to score. Huges lying on the floor looking for a whistle still makes me smile. To give him credit he is one of the more bearable managers.
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 6, 2009 9:59:47 GMT
Yes because he is an arse who always moans his bag when his team lose. He also has the same partial blindness as Wenger!
|
|
|
|
Post by Menorca Stokie on Feb 6, 2009 10:05:44 GMT
"Should Mark Hughes be charged"
It depends how flat he was in the first place and what type of jump leads you're using.
Overnight should do the trick. ;D
|
|
