|
|
Post by Scotty Mac on Feb 3, 2009 16:21:56 GMT
Signed for United for 3m!!!
Fantastic bit of business from TP
Read it in the Telegraph
|
|
|
|
Post by stokie01 on Feb 3, 2009 16:22:38 GMT
Flipping heck!
|
|
|
|
Post by PottersPride on Feb 3, 2009 16:23:36 GMT
good business
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Feb 3, 2009 16:25:59 GMT
That can't be right, surely?!
By the way, he played for Man Utd reserves against Liverpool last week, which ended in a 0-0 draw.
|
|
|
|
Post by crimesy on Feb 3, 2009 16:26:45 GMT
i also heard this but hought it was boolocks! Surely not?  |
|
|
|
Post by crimesy on Feb 3, 2009 16:27:53 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 16:28:40 GMT
It only says “3m”.
It could mean 3 melons, 3 mittens etc.
I think we put in a sell on clause of 4 jaffa’s and a bag of cheese and onion too.
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Feb 3, 2009 16:29:48 GMT
Very true, Etherington could well cost around £3 million.
|
|
|
|
Post by kevkj on Feb 3, 2009 16:29:55 GMT
That quote says 3 million for Etherington not Delaet
|
|
|
|
Post by LDE76 on Feb 3, 2009 16:30:08 GMT
The only £3m mentioned there is the possible Etherington fee.
|
|
|
|
Post by Scotty Mac on Feb 3, 2009 16:30:14 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by kevkj on Feb 3, 2009 16:31:02 GMT
Cant be right
|
|
|
|
Post by apb1 on Feb 3, 2009 16:32:26 GMT
wow
wonder what we're getting for Philips?
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Feb 3, 2009 16:33:19 GMT
wonder what we're getting for Philips? Nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by LDE76 on Feb 3, 2009 16:33:52 GMT
Methinks the Telegraph have surely subjected a testicle to the effects of gravity.
I mean they've dropped a bollock.
|
|
|
|
Post by PONTAFCE on Feb 3, 2009 16:39:21 GMT
A player with potential and we get rid typical oh well  |
|
|
|
Post by DannyStokie on Feb 3, 2009 16:42:10 GMT
we bought him for man u, isn't it obvious?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bick on Feb 3, 2009 17:00:47 GMT
If that is right, that is an awesome bit of business. 3m out for matty, 3mil in for richie. Good swap.
|
|
|
|
Post by jamie75 on Feb 3, 2009 17:02:57 GMT
I do think he was always going to United but I dont understand why.
Why couldnt they have bought him and stuck him in there 2nd or 3rd string?
|
|
|
|
Post by apb1 on Feb 3, 2009 17:05:05 GMT
wonder what we're getting for Philips? Nothing. That's what I assumed for RDL ;D Pericard must be worth Kaka-esque amounts as he's actually played (or nearly) in the prem |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2009 18:04:11 GMT
There is no way on this earth that this is true.
|
|
|
|
Post by ukstoke1 on Feb 3, 2009 18:10:52 GMT
This is not right! There is something really dodgy about the delaet deal! I would love to know the ins and outs!
|
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Feb 3, 2009 18:18:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Miniman on Feb 3, 2009 18:39:14 GMT
I though it was aperformance package deal...whre he plays well and the fee rises bor something like that anyway |
|
|
|
Post by LDE76 on Feb 3, 2009 18:42:22 GMT
I though it was aperformance package deal...whre he plays well and the fee rises bor something like that anyway Yeah. So the fee may get close to £3m if he wins European Footballer of The Year in the next two seasons. |
|
|
|
Post by andy9196 on Feb 3, 2009 18:45:52 GMT
I read on here that is was £250k. It probably includes a fee of £2.75 m for Shawcross at the end of the season !!
|
|
