|
|
Post by lordeffinghamhunt on Jan 31, 2009 18:27:00 GMT
You lot did not believe in the boy Beattie. But one always knew that he would be, along with the lad Etherington a fine couple of signings for Stoke  |
|
|
|
Post by banburypotter on Jan 31, 2009 18:30:32 GMT
well if it stops you fucking moaning then yes you were right  |
|
|
|
Post by stokie25 on Jan 31, 2009 18:31:28 GMT
WTF! We DID BELIEVE IN BEATTIE AND ETHERS!! Where has this come from?
|
|
|
|
Post by johnsmithsupper on Jan 31, 2009 18:33:07 GMT
You lot did not believe in the boy Beattie. But one always knew that he would be, along with the lad Etherington a fine couple of signings for Stoke I presume this is ones attempt at sarcasm. I thought one thought they were a pair of old duffers |
|
|
|
Post by viiistokieviii on Jan 31, 2009 18:33:25 GMT
You got back from Morecambe quickly  |
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Jan 31, 2009 18:36:32 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by boothenendboy on Jan 31, 2009 18:36:53 GMT
lord eff has the same IP address as spiderman.funny that.
|
|
|
|
Post by bogus on Jan 31, 2009 18:37:01 GMT
You lot did not believe in the boy Beattie. But one always knew that he would be, along with the lad Etherington a fine couple of signings for Stoke Of course you did You don't get a lot right really, do you? |
|
|
|
Post by stokie25 on Jan 31, 2009 18:40:45 GMT
bogus...he didn't get this right either! Where can you justify that people thought Ethers and Beattie would under perform?
|
|
|
|
Post by trebor63 on Jan 31, 2009 18:41:36 GMT
So the only person that remembers anyone saying anything negative about Beattie and Ethers is Lord Eff!
The negative posters have been out on the board in their numbers recently but Lord Eff must be one of the most negative of all.
|
|
|
|
Post by bogus on Jan 31, 2009 18:43:21 GMT
bogus...he didn't get this right either! Where can you justify that people thought Ethers and Beattie would under perform? 25, I know he said Beattie was toss, mate. ;D I was being sarcastic, hence the.................... |
|
|
|
Post by Targaryen Stokie on Jan 31, 2009 18:43:37 GMT
You lot did not believe in the boy Beattie. But one always knew that he would be, along with the lad Etherington a fine couple of signings for Stoke I actually found this funny, one is glad that you have admitted you were wrong. :-) (Assuming you were being sarcastic). ;D |
|
|
|
Post by stokie25 on Jan 31, 2009 18:47:08 GMT
I'm lost ???
I'm on here every day and don't recall anyone knocking our new signings! If they did...i'd have been the first moaning as they've been awesome up to now!
|
|
|
|
Post by bogus on Jan 31, 2009 19:10:13 GMT
I'm lost ??? I'm on here every day and don't recall anyone knocking our new signings! If they did...i'd have been the first moaning as they've been awesome up to now! He was critical before we signed him, 25.  |
|
|
|
Post by stokie25 on Jan 31, 2009 19:14:45 GMT
bogus...that would make Lord Eff an Arsehole...sorry for stating the obvious!
Long Live Beattie and Ethers as Stokies!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 31, 2009 19:49:37 GMT
You lot did not believe in the boy Beattie. But one always knew that he would be, along with the lad Etherington a fine couple of signings for Stoke Fuck off mart, you said, if I recall, that he'd be a "disastrous" signing. |
|
|
|
Post by stokie25 on Jan 31, 2009 20:10:46 GMT
....and once again, Lord Eff is exposed as an absolute twat!!
|
|
