|
Post by mumf14 on Jan 18, 2009 0:29:14 GMT
....would the result have been any different.?
I think so.
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Jan 18, 2009 0:31:20 GMT
Don't want to criticise Cresswell, but after Beattie's performance, I can't wait to see him and Ric up front together.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 18, 2009 0:32:44 GMT
If he'd been available, would he have started?
|
|
|
Post by Stokester on Jan 18, 2009 0:33:54 GMT
Who knows, as march4 said though the prospect of Beattie & Ricci together upfront is something to look forward to!
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Jan 18, 2009 0:34:35 GMT
Good question Paul. I think he plays when he is fit and willing. TP wraps him in cotton wool when he is tired.
|
|
|
Post by Alvechurch Assassin on Jan 18, 2009 0:35:10 GMT
we'd have played exactly the same way with fuller barely getting a sniff.
the important thing now is that we do play with an attacking intent now that we have seen off the fixtures against the big boys. every game from now until the end of the season is winnable.
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Jan 18, 2009 0:35:36 GMT
March4 I agree....The difference will be a more cohesive blend of power and trickery.I can see both linking up well and Beattie made some great passes today. Ricardo Fuller and Beattie were made for each other.
|
|
|
Post by robinreliant on Jan 18, 2009 0:37:40 GMT
....would the result have been any different.? I think so. 'Course it would ! We'ed've been viewing an even bigger bitch slappin' 'cause Ric'd have been stewin' for another fortnight (and may have even slapped Cresswell !) Keep the faith & believe ! TEAMS stay up, individuals DON'T ! Even Kaka is human, as he'll soon find out if & when he steps foot in the Brit. Six foot plus Senegalese hard man vs feck all of Brazilian primadonna equals one resulting yellow/red card plus one broken Kaka. STRETCHER !
|
|
|
Post by Smudge_SCFC on Jan 18, 2009 0:38:28 GMT
Who knows, as march4 said though the prospect of Beattie & Ricci together upfront is something to look forward to! Could be very interesting to see, Fuller and Beattie up front... and Cresswell on the left wing!!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 18, 2009 0:48:28 GMT
Good question Paul. I think he plays when he is fit and willing. TP wraps him in cotton wool when he is tired. The reason I asked the question, was because if he had have been available, would this have meant that Pulis would have played 4-4-2 today and not played Cresswell in the hole. I honestly believe that he would have still started with Cresswell even if Ric had been available! You could suggest that he would have played Beattie in the hole, but if that had of been the case, why didn't he do that anyway today with Kits up top?
|
|
|
Post by STAY UP FOR PLANTY on Jan 18, 2009 0:50:17 GMT
I think with beattie the pressure can be lifted off ric and maybe he'll be less frustrated ... Hopefully kiston can have some luck
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Jan 18, 2009 0:54:12 GMT
Paul Spenser....I disagree.I think Pulis is well aware that in the final minutes of that game Fuller is a player who can hold the ball up well and take some of the pressure off our tired defenders legs.Cresswell ran himself into the ground never the less , but when he did get the ball ended upp losing it rather quickly. I'm not saying we may have won the game, but in these kind of situations Fuller is the man you want on the field rather than Cresswell.
Whem Sidibe is fit enough to return I can see Fuller and Beattie up front with Sidibe in his usual role with Kitson warming the bench.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 18, 2009 0:58:16 GMT
mumf are you saying that you think Pulis would have started with Fuller today, if he was available, playing in a 4-4-2?
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 18, 2009 1:02:11 GMT
I'd like to think we'd go with Fuller and Beattie whenever possible.
When you've got a front 2 of their quality, surely you've got to try and lay a glove on the opposition. They're a proper Premier League strike partnership.
Not go gung-ho, but just give yourselves the chance to cash in on possession in their third.
This tactic of inviting pressure onto ourselves, surrendering possession and territory and setting ourselves up for a barrage, a bit like Ali in the Rumble in the Jungle, is normally going to end one way.
Having said that, we nearly pulled off a heroic Rocky Bilbao-like miracle for the third time this season, after Wigan and Liverpool and all the players deserve a medal.
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Jan 18, 2009 1:04:36 GMT
Paul....Yes I do think he would have played Fuller today.Pulis has always regarded Fuller as 'Special'.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 18, 2009 1:05:59 GMT
I'd like to think we'd go with Fuller and Beattie whenever possible. When you've got a front 2 of their quality, surely you've got to try and lay a glove on the opposition. They're a proper Premier League strike partnership. Not go gung-ho, but just give yourselves the chance to cash in on possession in their third. This tactic of inviting pressure onto ourselves, surrendering possession and territory and setting ourselves up for a barrage, a bit like Ali in the Rumble in the Jungle, is normally going to end one way. Having said that, we nearly pulled off a heroic Rocky Bilbao-like miracle for the third time this season, after Wigan and Liverpool and all the players deserve a medal. Spot on FM. I'll not be a happy bunny at all if we set up in a 4-4-1-1 at White Hart Lane!
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 18, 2009 1:06:49 GMT
Paul....Yes I do think he would have played Fuller today.Pulis has always regarded Fuller as 'Special'. In a 4-4-2 mumf?
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Jan 18, 2009 1:12:24 GMT
The game against Chelsea may have meant a more defensive game plan but in all honesty a 4 4 2 with Fuller in side would not have surprised me.
IT CERTAINLY WILL BE the way we play at home.Our away games may continue to be more defensive. You can never quite tell how Tony is likely to go sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 18, 2009 1:18:53 GMT
The game against Chelsea may have meant a more defensive game plan but in all honesty a 4 4 2 with Fuller in side would not have surprised me. IT CERTAINLY WILL BE the way we play at home.Our away games may continue to be more defensive. You can never quite tell how Tony is likely to go sometimes. Mumf if Fuller had been available I would have been furious if he hadn't started, but I just don't think Pulis would have had the bottle to go to Stamford Bridge today and play 4-4-2.
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Jan 18, 2009 1:24:48 GMT
Playing 4 4 2 doesn't necessarily mean that the game plan is more attacking. Both strikers up front may be asked to chase back more with just the one designated to stay up front or alternate the role as directed. Essentially it does appear a more attacking role in the trueist sense of a 4 4 2 formation, but this may only be evident from big kicks up field from defence or the goalkeeper.
|
|
|
Post by Paul Spencer on Jan 18, 2009 1:29:46 GMT
Playing 4 4 2 doesn't necessarily mean that the game plan is more attacking. Both strikers up front may be asked to chase back more with just the one designated to stay up front or alternate the role as directed. Essentially it does appear a more attacking role in the trueist sense of a 4 4 2 formation, but this may only be evident from big kicks up field from defence or the goalkeeper. I agree completely mate. I would have preferred Pulis to have started with Beattie and Kitson today.
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Jan 18, 2009 1:35:54 GMT
In the short space of time Kitson was on the field he looked brighter and sharper...more confident.Perhaps he relishes the prospect of playing alongside Beattie on a regular basis but I fear he may be mistaken.I can only see him as a 'Super sub' ...however unrealistic this expression may be in reality..
I also thought that Cresswell worked his socks off , but sadly his skill level not up to the standard required.No one could knock him for his efforts tho'...and that goes for the rest of the team too. We were outclassed...to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jan 18, 2009 8:02:07 GMT
TP always seems to use Fuller as a sub after Fuller has had a layoff for a few games whether it is for international duty, injury or suspension. So I reckon Fuller would have started on the bench. If he had come on for Cresswell with 20 minutes to go then it might have changed the result. Chelsea would have had to contend with a fresh Fuller for the last few minutes and might have been wary of throwing so many men forward given Fuller's ability to run at defenders and get goals from breakaways.
Still, it is all water under the bridge now - hopefully our next trip to London will see our first away win at Spurs.
|
|
|
Post by s8to on Jan 18, 2009 8:22:46 GMT
TP always seems to use Fuller as a sub after Fuller has had a layoff for a few games whether it is for international duty, injury or suspension. So I reckon Fuller would have started on the bench. If he had come on for Cresswell with 20 minutes to go then it might have changed the result. Chelsea would have had to contend with a fresh Fuller for the last few minutes and might have been wary of throwing so many men forward given Fuller's ability to run at defenders and get goals from breakaways. Still, it is all water under the bridge now - hopefully our next trip to London will see our first away win at Spurs. ... and I think this is why Cresswell will still play (start) when Fuller is available, begs belief, but I am sure that is what will happen. Fuller will come off the bench.
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Jan 18, 2009 10:34:49 GMT
He'd have probably slapped Sorrensson for letting that equaliser in
|
|
Abdoulayefaye!
Academy Starlet
there was once a toilet paper made by abdoulaye faye, it wouldnt take shit from anyone.
Posts: 187
|
Post by Abdoulayefaye! on Jan 18, 2009 11:18:09 GMT
Haha
think fuller would of made alot of difference personally.
|
|
|
Post by mumf14 on Jan 18, 2009 11:29:59 GMT
Haha think fuller would of made alot of difference personally. I still hold the belief that Fuller is arguably the best player we have...better than Kitson or Beattie.I will continue to do so until proved otherwise by the performances of those two I have just mentioned. There are several candidates some may argue...but none have that special piece of trickery and guile to win a game virtually single handed, which Fuller clearly can. This is the main reason why we have to put up with his errant behaviour at times....but it is worth it in the end.That's why Tony calls him fondly the 'special one'.
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Jan 18, 2009 11:35:07 GMT
This is the main reason why we have to put up with his errant behaviour at times
Mmmm, I know what you mean but his last act was amazingly bad and very costly. After his ed against Luton in 07 he came back in great form and pulled his head in. Hopefully he can repat that.
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Jan 18, 2009 12:24:29 GMT
Haha think fuller would of made alot of difference personally. I still hold the belief that Fuller is arguably the best player we have...better than Kitson or Beattie.I will continue to do so until proved otherwise by the performances of those two I have just mentioned. There are several candidates some may argue...but none have that special piece of trickery and guile to win a game virtually single handed, which Fuller clearly can. This is the main reason why we have to put up with his errant behaviour at times....but it is worth it in the end.That's why Tony calls him fondly the 'special one'. Totally agree with that, mumf. Some of Fuller's antics stick in the craw, but I think he's still the best player we've got. Can't see him going anywhere, and I'd hope he's still the first name on the team sheet. I think Fuller-Beattie, a genuine Premier League standard pairing ,is the way to go in nearly every situation.
|
|
|
Post by bentrep01 on Jan 18, 2009 12:37:53 GMT
Fuller`s goin nowhere cos he cant pass a conventional medical,but the thought of 3 up front,Mama`s flick on providing the ammo for Ric and BT is truely mouth watering.Come on TP take a gamble I say and stuff it up some of your detractors
|
|