|
|
Post by cousindupree on Jan 8, 2009 8:14:54 GMT
Would be surprised if we got both but with MON and Harewood agent suggesting nobody from Stoke has been in touch and Wigan awaiting the arrival of a striker maybe Camara is the one we will end up with.
Although not overwhelmed by Harewood I dont know much about Camara.....what do others think?
Would he fill the Mama role as Harewood would?
|
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Jan 8, 2009 8:15:27 GMT
Leroy Lita
|
|
|
|
Post by Danstoke82 on Jan 8, 2009 8:19:44 GMT
Tough call and to be honest Im not sure, however, Camara would seem the more prolific at present as Harewood hasn't done much, can we take both? that way we can phase out Vince finally from all first team affairs.
|
|
|
|
Post by stone6 on Jan 8, 2009 8:22:30 GMT
+ Harewood and Camara and say goodbye to Fuller,Vince and Cressie |
|
|
|
Post by minsterleypotter on Jan 8, 2009 8:22:38 GMT
we will get both
|
|
|
|
Post by prem4stoke on Jan 8, 2009 8:25:16 GMT
Lita will go anywhere you can buy him with a packet of crisps ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jan 8, 2009 8:25:22 GMT
Camera and Harewood are totally different players. Harewood can play the target man role - a bit like Mama not perhaps as good at holding the ball up but with more goals. Camara is much more pacey and mobile - more like Fuller although possibly without Fuller's ability to run "through" defenders.
|
|
|
|
Post by cousindupree on Jan 8, 2009 8:31:17 GMT
Thanks Forny.....I guess ideally we need both but a backup to Mama I assume would be TP's choice.....or is he going to ditch his Plan A
|
|
