|
Post by alansuddick on Dec 28, 2008 16:34:22 GMT
never in my wildest dreams did i think we would use either in the premier league. but i know who id have preffered if we had to keep one,and it aint pericard.
|
|
|
Post by Big Al on Dec 28, 2008 16:35:25 GMT
parkin
|
|
|
Post by hutchstokie1 on Dec 28, 2008 16:35:39 GMT
parkin
|
|
|
Post by stokie63 on Dec 28, 2008 16:40:09 GMT
none they are both toss.
|
|
|
Post by sgtpotter89 on Dec 28, 2008 16:41:26 GMT
rather have parkin myself
|
|
|
Post by Mickstoke on Dec 28, 2008 16:42:15 GMT
porkin all day
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Dec 28, 2008 16:44:17 GMT
Parkin
|
|
|
Post by dadofsam on Dec 28, 2008 16:45:39 GMT
Patterson
|
|
|
Post by premierpotters08 on Dec 28, 2008 16:46:34 GMT
porkin
zigic
|
|
|
Post by stonestokie! on Dec 28, 2008 16:46:35 GMT
im better than em both
|
|
|
Post by stockportpotter on Dec 28, 2008 16:46:57 GMT
oh come on lads for fucks sake! I know vince is bad but remember the slating Parkin used to get? You are seriously telling me you would want him back? Either or is the lesser of two evils. We got half a million for Parkin, good deal if you ask me.
|
|
|
Post by redrob on Dec 28, 2008 16:48:50 GMT
neither are anywhere near good enough
|
|
|
Post by alansuddick on Dec 28, 2008 16:50:25 GMT
would much rather patterson had a chance,but hes been gone 2 years. just feel parkin would ve been a lot more useful than pericard.wouldnt get in any top ten teams in the championship.
|
|
|
Post by craig1974 on Dec 28, 2008 16:57:10 GMT
Paterson 4 me
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Dec 28, 2008 16:59:09 GMT
Thats how wank Pulis is with strikers its either Pericard or Parkin,Cresswell!!!
For the question fuckin NONE THEY ARE BOTH WANK
|
|
|
Post by dadofsam on Dec 28, 2008 17:02:05 GMT
Pulis doesn't 'do' strikers does he?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2008 17:04:45 GMT
Pericard
|
|
|
Post by RMSCFC on Dec 28, 2008 22:04:54 GMT
fuck?!?!?!?!? thats not rli a question
Parkin
|
|