|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Dec 15, 2008 18:48:44 GMT
If Mama's injury is serious I think Olly is the man. He is big, strong and has decent pace and technical ability. I honestly believe he is a better choice than Cress and Vince up front. Especially in the Mama role! Come on Olly, show them that you can do this! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Dec 15, 2008 18:51:27 GMT
Pulis has got a decision to make really, either try and find the correct player too try and play the role mama has been, and try and supply service to riccy, with flick-on's etc....or adopt a new approach, that doesn't include a target man.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Pretty Little Boother on Dec 15, 2008 18:52:20 GMT
I think that might not be too radical an idea, actually... I'm pretty sure he might have filled in up front at least once or twice for Wolves. Whether he was any good at it is another issue though.  |
|
|
|
Post by Bick on Dec 15, 2008 18:52:36 GMT
Probably not as a rediculous a shout as it sounds. Although I was impressed with Vince, feel he deserves a shot. If not, Olly could well be the man to take us through to January
|
|
|
|
Post by banburypotter on Dec 15, 2008 18:54:32 GMT
i actually think that is a good shout rob
|
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stokie on Dec 15, 2008 18:59:26 GMT
nah i cant really see that TBH, Cressie or Vince as the target man and the same system unfortunately
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 15, 2008 19:16:01 GMT
Does he have the workrate for it, given his role thus far as the definition of anonymity?
|
|
|
|
Post by eddy_under_fire'sviews on Dec 15, 2008 19:21:27 GMT
i think vince should be given a couple of games. he impressed me when he came on.
creswell and fuller blatantly does not work though... not with this current system anyway
|
|
|
|
Post by crimesy on Dec 15, 2008 19:21:39 GMT
that a fair good idea imho.. the theory to it makes sense, wether it would actually work is another.
|
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Dec 16, 2008 20:07:22 GMT
;D  ;D |
|
|
|
Post by dexter97 on Dec 16, 2008 21:12:07 GMT
Worth a go I suppose, but I'm not optimistic it would be anywhere near as effective. The "Mama role" is not just one of conventional target man - It's unique, almost as if it's devised specifically for the big man's abilities. Square pegs and round holes springs to mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by MrMagic on Dec 16, 2008 21:19:03 GMT
If Mama was unavailable, I'd try a tactical approach that didn't involve Mama. Crazy I know, but hey?
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Dec 16, 2008 21:26:34 GMT
I think the world is going mad. Oli is not good enough in his strongest position. The thought of him playing an unfamiliar role is a recipe for disaster.
The only one of our average Championship players who will be considered are Cresswell and Pericard as they are familiar with the role and Cort due to his heading ability. All 3 are very poor imitations of Mama.
BTW any sign of Kitson - this is a long injury lay off!!!!
|
|
;D
