|
|
Post by french toast on Nov 25, 2008 0:52:15 GMT
will man city be after selling there young lads no as they can buy anyone
strridge for 4 million maybe??? good signing in my opinion
|
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Nov 25, 2008 6:49:47 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Nov 25, 2008 7:11:32 GMT
I notice on this profile Simon Sturridge apparently only played for Birmingham City.  |
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Nov 25, 2008 7:12:41 GMT
yeah I saw that, why not edit it ? ;D
He was part of the 2nd most famous SAS strike force
|
|
|
|
Post by Rebelliousjukebox on Nov 25, 2008 7:16:06 GMT
yeah I saw that, why not edit it ? ;D He was part of the 2nd most famous SAS strike force Never edited a Wikipedia entry before, but will give it a go when time allows. |
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Nov 25, 2008 7:17:48 GMT
We might have a chance of getting him on loan but I can't see Man City selling him until they see how far he progresses. However much cash they have why would they sell a potential England player at so young an age?
|
|
|
|
Post by A-teen_six_T3 on Nov 25, 2008 7:45:57 GMT
There will be a lot better teams than us after him IMO
|
|
|
|
Post by daverichards on Nov 25, 2008 7:52:06 GMT
probably fella, but wouldn't it be nice if his uncle put in a good word for us  when ever I hear his name on MOTD I have a quick flash back to the mid 1990s team Lou assembled that got us to the play offs |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 25, 2008 8:39:12 GMT
He lives in Congleton so handy for a loan signing.
|
|
|
|
Post by redblue on Nov 25, 2008 8:50:32 GMT
I don't think Man City would let him go but I can see him being let out on loan to some team to give him some first team action. When they start buying in January I don't think he'll get as many games.
|
|
|
|
Post by knowles on Nov 25, 2008 9:40:44 GMT
Chelsea are meant to be after him. I thought he played extemely well against us the other week and seemed a far better option than the highly rated Ched Evans (on that one showing at least)
|
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Nov 25, 2008 12:26:49 GMT
We might have a chance of getting him on loan but I can't see Man City selling him until they see how far he progresses. However much cash they have why would they sell a potential England player at so young an age? man utd did with shawcross |
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Nov 25, 2008 12:28:59 GMT
Sturridge is a bit younger than Shawcross was when we loaned him and Sturridge has played youth football for England whereas Shawcross hadn't at the time he joined us.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Nov 25, 2008 13:16:20 GMT
might get him on loan but Chelsea have consistently been linked at aprox £9m.
|
|
|
|
Post by smigchop on Nov 25, 2008 15:46:04 GMT
apparently there having problems with his contract too and he could end up leaving on a free.
so they may be keen to sell in jan if it looks like he wants to leave. probably end up at chelsea next summer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Strange Boy on Nov 25, 2008 15:52:45 GMT
Agreed. Cant see them selling. But it is deffo a perfect opportunity to set up a nice little loan deal!
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Nov 25, 2008 15:54:42 GMT
At his age he can't leave on a free they'd be entitled to compensation from a tribunal. Not sure how much tribunal compo claims for young players go up to these days. Several £million I should think.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mozzaa on Nov 25, 2008 15:59:19 GMT
|
|
