|
|
Post by northstokie on Nov 6, 2008 16:12:25 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 6, 2008 16:21:36 GMT
he's a cock
Not a single match report I read after the Stoke City game mentioned the horror challenge on Emmanuel Adebayor courtesy of Ryan Shawcross. I fail to understand how Ryan Shawcross was not even shown a yellow card, when in fact he should have been given his marching orders right there and then
Two words mate - Rob Styles
The only true words he writes in that article are:-
I accept that we played poorly, I accept that we lost, I accept that Stoke out fought us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Irish Stokie on Nov 6, 2008 16:32:33 GMT
So Delaps perfectly timed tackle on Sagna got a 4/5 for brutality and Van Persies sending off offence got a 2/5 for brutality. HA ha ha ha you just have to laugh at rubbish like that!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Kenilworth_Stokies on Nov 6, 2008 16:35:19 GMT
I have left my comments, no doubt I won't be the last.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sparkiee on Nov 6, 2008 16:39:48 GMT
Someone has to agree with Wenger or else he might cry  That post made me laugh at the least. |
|
|
|
Post by bromleystoke on Nov 6, 2008 17:25:27 GMT
Total idiot! Anyone else notice its written by MR Mcphail!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Oatcake Andy on Nov 6, 2008 17:30:16 GMT
I have left my comments, no doubt I won't be the last. Too right. I've just left mine  |
|
|
|
Post by bigb35 on Nov 6, 2008 17:41:32 GMT
Does anybody have a video of this supposedly horror tackle by Shawcross, just want to prove that he dosnt know his distances, 3 yards my arse :@
|
|
|
|
Post by Lawto on Nov 6, 2008 17:46:23 GMT
And since when are there rows of photographers in the Seddon stand??? That's where Shawcross tackled adebayor, right in front of me in Block 31!!
|
|
|
|
Post by trebor63 on Nov 6, 2008 17:46:01 GMT
Does anybody have a video of this supposedly horror tackle by Shawcross, just want to prove that he dosnt know his distances, 3 yards my arse :@ LOL ;D If that was three yards out of play I've just realised the gudgeon I caught whilst fishing years ago is bigger than the biggest shark ever caught! And as for my willy...... ;D |
|
|
|
Post by th05 on Nov 6, 2008 17:51:53 GMT
Utter shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by stockportpotter on Nov 6, 2008 18:09:07 GMT
the ball was rolling out towards the photographers. Is that the photographers who were sat behind the goals? so it wouldn't be the same photographers that this nobsack has said the ball was rolling towards, seeing as the foul took place on the touchline in front of the family stand. Maybe the clear arsenal fan read all articles to gague an opinion because he has never watched a live arsenal match in his life. Prick.
|
|
|
|
Post by rev1001 on Nov 6, 2008 18:11:23 GMT
As i have posted somewhere else. Since the arrival of Mr We Play Football Fairly and Don't Stoop To Bad Tackling Wenger, Arsenal have had something like 69 RED CARDS. So surely all these so called experts of the game should get a few more facts together before printing. GLASSHOUSES and THROWING STONES come to mind.
|
|
|
|
Post by boothenender on Nov 6, 2008 18:11:54 GMT
mr.mcphail has made himself look and sound a bigger idiot than arsehole wiper....
the majority of replies to this article are in favour of stoke city...
why dont we all draw a line under this silly episode....
and get on with supporting our world beating warriors....
|
|
|
|
Post by crimesy on Nov 6, 2008 18:24:31 GMT
So Delaps perfectly timed tackle on Sagna got a 4/5 for brutality and Van Persies sending off offence got a 2/5 for brutality. HA ha ha ha you just have to laugh at rubbish like that!!! thats shocking.. the government should be on the watch for people like this and then find out what went wrong  |
|
|
|
Post by french toast on Nov 6, 2008 18:46:18 GMT
Tackle four As Thomas Sorensen, the Stoke goalkeeper, wastes time by waiting to gather a loose ball, a frustrated Van Persie tries in vain to reach it before his opponent picks it up. But the Dutchman’s momentum carries him into Sorensen and, rather than try to pull away, he barges the goalkeeper off his feet.
yes thats how it happened, what a tit
|
|
|
|
Post by Lightwood on Nov 6, 2008 19:05:57 GMT
one of the best responses to the article
'It's inevitable that people will read this article and feel that I am just being a sore loser, and that I am just your typical Arsenal fan who cannot accept the spirit and hard work of old school English footballing outfit'
No Mr McPhail, on the basis of the drivel that you have penned, you don't come close to reaching those heights. You have simply jumped on Mr Whinger's bandwagon, long after the event, with barely an eye to the facts. I was there, I saw the game and had I witnessed Mr Whinger complaining at the time or woken up the next day to OBJECTIVE reports about Stoke's 'brutality' then I might take some notice of your comments. I didn't, I won't, and neither will the vast majority of clear thinking people.
To say that the responses from Peter Coates and Tony Pulis betrayed responsibility for the player's actions simply defies belief. I can't remember seeing such moderate, balanced replies from any managers or chairmen. They were spot on.
And lets put all this into perspective. A couple of weeks ago Stoke played Spurs, who ended the game with nine men. Hutton was sent off for a very bad challenge that put eight stitches in Sorensen's face and Dawson went for an over the top challenge which nearly amounted to an assault. Did Stoke suggest that those players deliberately set out to injure their opponents? Did anyone, anywhere, mount a campaign against Spurs, notwithstanding that both challenges were much worse than the ones you are writing about? The answer to both questions is no, and the reason for that is that everyone else just gets on with it. You are just another apologist for Wenger, the biggest whinger in British football, who only started this whole 'debate' in order to deflect what he knew was coming, i.e. another weak performance in Europe. He and the likes of you have simply targeted Stoke in a way that you wouldn't dream of going for established clubs because you think that you can get away with it. The vast majority of objective observers know whats going on, and it reflects very badly on Arsenal and their pathetic excuse for a manager.
|
|
|
|
Post by Squeekster on Nov 6, 2008 20:23:41 GMT
one of the best responses to the article 'It's inevitable that people will read this article and feel that I am just being a sore loser, and that I am just your typical Arsenal fan who cannot accept the spirit and hard work of old school English footballing outfit' No Mr McPhail, on the basis of the drivel that you have penned, you don't come close to reaching those heights. You have simply jumped on Mr Whinger's bandwagon, long after the event, with barely an eye to the facts. I was there, I saw the game and had I witnessed Mr Whinger complaining at the time or woken up the next day to OBJECTIVE reports about Stoke's 'brutality' then I might take some notice of your comments. I didn't, I won't, and neither will the vast majority of clear thinking people. To say that the responses from Peter Coates and Tony Pulis betrayed responsibility for the player's actions simply defies belief. I can't remember seeing such moderate, balanced replies from any managers or chairmen. They were spot on. And lets put all this into perspective. A couple of weeks ago Stoke played Spurs, who ended the game with nine men. Hutton was sent off for a very bad challenge that put eight stitches in Sorensen's face and Dawson went for an over the top challenge which nearly amounted to an assault. Did Stoke suggest that those players deliberately set out to injure their opponents? Did anyone, anywhere, mount a campaign against Spurs, notwithstanding that both challenges were much worse than the ones you are writing about? The answer to both questions is no, and the reason for that is that everyone else just gets on with it. You are just another apologist for Wenger, the biggest whinger in British football, who only started this whole 'debate' in order to deflect what he knew was coming, i.e. another weak performance in Europe. He and the likes of you have simply targeted Stoke in a way that you wouldn't dream of going for established clubs because you think that you can get away with it. The vast majority of objective observers know whats going on, and it reflects very badly on Arsenal and their pathetic excuse for a manager.
I noticed in both recalls that it says Hutton was sent off he wasn't Bale and Dawson were they were the only two. |
|
|
|
Post by SneydGreenStokie on Nov 6, 2008 20:43:22 GMT
The people posting actual match reports from proper newspapers basically sum it up. Doesnt need any other defence. They cant all be wrong can they. Sour grapes Arsenal. They know how to win, but they certainly dont know how to lose.
SGS
|
|
Flip
Academy Starlet
Posts: 132
|
Post by Flip on Nov 6, 2008 20:46:33 GMT
Yep hutton only got a yellow for the tackle on sorrenson
|
|
