|
|
Post by cousindupree on Jul 29, 2008 9:29:07 GMT
I haven't quite grasped why some are undisclosed...I assume its because theres a clause in the contract saying so as they dont want the fee to be common knowledge..but wouldn't most transfers be undisclosed???? ???.....confused... maybe it was the half bottle of Makers Mark last night!
|
|
|
|
Post by robin1302 on Jul 29, 2008 12:47:43 GMT
Probably when a club spends much more on a player than he's actually worth, they don't want the value to be known. That's always what I've thought.. ???
|
|
|
|
Post by oularesarse on Jul 29, 2008 12:48:54 GMT
always thought the signing club doesn't want to alert other clubs how much they are prepared to splash out
|
|
|
|
Post by luke45 on Jul 29, 2008 13:01:20 GMT
always thought the signing club doesn't want to alert other clubs how much they are prepared to splash out That was always my theory aswell.  |
|
|
|
Post by Do it inthe Prem for 3rdminute on Jul 29, 2008 13:11:10 GMT
And they probably don't want the fans to know how much they wasted on a player they think is a bag of shit!
|
|
|
|
Post by stokiemia on Jul 29, 2008 13:21:14 GMT
Its to protect the players interests! It is often the case that a club will accept numerous offers for players from different clubs. The player may choose the highest / lowest due to personal reasons and not want other fans to know that which he chose.
As in if he chose the lowest, the higher bidders would be very anti the player, so they keep it undisclosed.
|
|
|
|
Post by M on Jul 29, 2008 13:28:11 GMT
I think it is only applicable when one or both of the clubs are limited companys, or something like that someone told me....
M
|
|
|
|
Post by Block 26 on Jul 29, 2008 14:40:13 GMT
I just thought it was when clubs don't want people to know how much they've spent. |
|
|
|
Post by grandad on Jul 29, 2008 16:59:09 GMT
i always think it sounds dodgy  |
|
|
|
Post by Menorca Stokie on Jul 29, 2008 17:22:50 GMT
I know the real reason but I'm not willing to disclose it.  |
|
|
|
Post by bigb35 on Jul 29, 2008 17:24:50 GMT
think its so other clubs dont know what the club is willing to pay for a player of that quality
|
|
|
|
Post by scfclifer on Jul 29, 2008 17:31:37 GMT
Probably when a club spends much more on a player than he's actually worth, they don't want the value to be known. That's always what I've thought.. ??? bob on with that me thinks have some karma  |
|
|
|
Post by rockhead163 on Jul 29, 2008 17:56:53 GMT
I know the real reason but I'm not willing to disclose it. karma for making me smile |
|
|
|
Post by DrGonzo on Jul 29, 2008 18:14:42 GMT
You can always find out the fee when the accounts are released! |
|
|
|
Post by cousindupree on Jul 29, 2008 21:26:54 GMT
Errrr...thanks guys I am really none the wiser ???
Seems to me that most deals would be undisclosed but they are not...anyway I have survived a few years without this nugget of knowledge...but hang on who was our last signing for an undisclosed fee???.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beardy200 on Jul 29, 2008 21:39:31 GMT
I know the real reason but I'm not willing to disclose it. Haha - like it  |
|
|
|
Post by jamie75 on Jul 29, 2008 22:40:59 GMT
You can always find out the fee when the accounts are released! No you can't. The accounts are never that detailed. |
|
