|
|
Post by ravey123 on Feb 17, 2024 18:38:20 GMT
Bonham 6
Gooch 5
Hoever 4
Rose 5 (those free headers he didn’t even get on target)
Wilmot 6
Thompson 7
Pearson 6
Baker 6
Cundle 7 (MOM)
Laurent 7
Lowe 6 decent hold up play but not even the slightest of goal threats
Burger 6
Manhoef 5
Junho 5
Junior 5
Ennis 5
|
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Feb 17, 2024 18:53:51 GMT
Bonham 6. not much to do.
Gooch 6, a lot of effort.
Hoever 2, hate him!
Rose 6, should have done better on set pieces.
Wilmot 4, liability!
Thompson 4, his left foot is vastly overrated!
Pearson 6, OK game.
Baker 6, Ok game!
Cundle 5, I still struggle to see his quality!
Laurent 6, OK.
Lowe 2, the invisible man!
Burger 6, should have started!
Manhoef 5, should hve started!
Junho 5, should have started!
Junior 5, should have started!
Ennis 5, should have started!
|
|
|
|
Post by robstokie on Feb 17, 2024 18:55:14 GMT
Bonham 6 - one decent save early doors, left horribly exposed for the goal, doesn't convince with ball at feet.
Wilmot 6 - generally solid without being convincing
Rose 6 - same as above to be honest. Got into positions to capitalize off set pieces but didn't.
Hoever 2 - liability, cost us the game today with some brain dead playing. Also the weak link every time.
Gooch 6 - looked good coming forward with ball at feet and did his defensive work ok too. Probably his best game as a full/wing back but that's not particularly a high watermark in itself.
Thompson 7 - probably our best outlet first half. Never stopped running and defended well too. MOTM.
Pearson 6.5 - one of his better games for us this season, worked hard, covered ground and retained ball well.
Baker 6 - kind of drifts in and out of games. Not anonymous, but didn't offer much either, bar corners that were our best opportunities.
Laurent 5.5 - linked up well on occasion with Thompson, again kind of anonymous.
Cundle 7 - full of running and effort looking to press, tracked back well and was generally neat and tidy but lacked any killer quality final third.
Lowe 5.5 - Tried, but not ready and offered zero physicality. Couple of decent link ups but didn't offer any threat behind them or aerially.
Subs
Ennis 6 - puts himself about, seems a similar sort to Jacob Brown but was given scraps on his own.
Burger 6.5 - head and shoulders the best player on the field when he came on today, changed the narrative of the game without us landing any meaningful blows on them, but his passing stretched them and put them on the back foot.
Tchamadeu 6 - solid enough, also dropped into midfield when opportunity allowed to allow us to push forward.
Manhoef 6 - looked hungry on the ball, and kept making himself available to run at people, even if it didn't come off. Should have done better with his one on one.
Bae 6.5 - made a real nuisance of himself, used his skill to create space and opportunities for overloads/balls into box but again lacks any end product. A bright cameo though.
|
|
|
|
Post by HarryTheHat on Feb 17, 2024 19:05:22 GMT
Bonham 6
Gooch 6
Hoever 3 (should never be played again)
Rose 4 (put the whole defence in trouble with lame attempt at a clearance in the first half and repeated crap heading from corners)
Wilmot 6
Thompson 6
Pearson 6
Baker 6
Cundle 6 (decent game from him today)
Laurent 6
Lowe 5 (not ready)
Burger 6
Manhoef 5 (one good effort, couple of poor crosses)
Junho 5 (looked lively, good feet but no real impact on proceedings)
Junior 5 (needs to stop over-hitting passes)
Ennis 5
|
|
|
|
Post by stokesupporter on Feb 17, 2024 19:36:39 GMT
Bonham 6 Didn't have much to do
Gooch 6 At times he played well
Hoever 3 Cost us a game really he seems always have one mistake in him
Rose 5 Not disastrous but not his best day
Wilmot 6 Did ok.
Thompson 6 Almost a 7 but not quite, was busy in a positive way.
Pearson 6 Did his basic work but nothing more
Baker 7 getting better gradually.
Cundle 7 *MOTM His best game for us so far
Laurent 6 not bad but a bit uneffective
Lowe 5 Did what he could, no service but couldn't create much at all.
Burger 6 solid display.
Manhoef 6 better from him.
Junho 6 bright today, limited time.
Junior 6 strong and offensive.
Ennis 5 did not get going, but I like him.
|
|
|
|
Post by thepottypotter on Feb 17, 2024 19:44:37 GMT
Bonham 6
Gooch 6
Hoever 4 (did ok first half)
Rose 5 (defensively was ok. Two really shit headers from good corners by baker dropped him by 1 point)
Wilmot 6
Thompson 7 (extra point for playing well out of position at LB)
Pearson 6
Baker 6
Cundle 7 (MOM)
Laurent 7
Lowe 6
Burger 6
Manhoef 5
Junho 5
Junior 5
Ennis 5
|
|
|
|
Post by sportsman on Feb 17, 2024 19:46:33 GMT
He’s only young but I’ve never Lowe run over 5mph. He just jogs to every ball
|
|
|
|
Post by Roger Everyone on Feb 17, 2024 19:51:28 GMT
Bonham 6 Didn't have a lot to do.
Gooch 6
Hoever 4
Rose 5
Wilmot 6
Thompson 6
Pearson 6
Baker 6
Cundle 7 (MOM)
Laurent 6
Lowe 6 did more than he got credit for (kept the defence busy even if he didn't have many chances)
Burger 6 should start next game
Manhoef 6 Should start next game
Junho 5
Junior 5 should start next game
Ennis 5 Should start next game
|
|
|
|
Post by middleoftheboothen on Feb 17, 2024 19:54:45 GMT
Bonham 6. not much to do. Gooch 6, a lot of effort. Hoever 2, hate him! Rose 6, should have done better on set pieces. Wilmot 4, liability! Thompson 4, his left foot is vastly overrated! Pearson 6, OK game. Baker 6, Ok game! Cundle 5, I still struggle to see his quality! Laurent 6, OK. Lowe 2, the invisible man! Burger 6, should have started! Manhoef 5, should hve started! Junho 5, should have started! Junior 5, should have started! Ennis 5, should have started! To give young Lowe the same mark as Hoever who handed them the win on the plate is questionable to say the least. The lad was on his own up front feeding off scraps but still gave it everything. Just a bit harsh I think there mate. |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Feb 17, 2024 19:56:20 GMT
Bonham 7 Did OK no chance with the goal. Very good save first half
Gooch 6, a lot of effort but not much quality
Hoever 4 stupid mistake for the goal
Rose 7 decent game bar his headers at the corners
Wilmot 6 average
Thompson 5 tries but lacks quality
Pearson 6 best game in a while
Baker 7 did ok
Cundle 6 bits and pieces but no impact
Laurent 6 ok
Lowe 4 Nowhere near ready. I’d rather we played one of the sulkers.
Burger 7 class
Manhoef 7 looked dangerous. Needs to start
Junho 6 should have started
Junior 6 powerful some silly mistakes though
Ennis 7 I like him. Needs to play every game
|
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Feb 17, 2024 20:06:57 GMT
Bonham 6. not much to do. Gooch 6, a lot of effort. Hoever 2, hate him! Rose 6, should have done better on set pieces. Wilmot 4, liability! Thompson 4, his left foot is vastly overrated! Pearson 6, OK game. Baker 6, Ok game! Cundle 5, I still struggle to see his quality! Laurent 6, OK. Lowe 2, the invisible man! Burger 6, should have started! Manhoef 5, should hve started! Junho 5, should have started! Junior 5, should have started! Ennis 5, should have started! To give young Lowe the same mark as Hoever who handed them the win on the plate is questionable to say the least. The lad was on his own up front feeding off scraps but still gave it everything. Just a bit harsh I think there mate. He was so invisible I'm not sure I would have noticed if we played with nobody up front to be honest.  |
|
|
|
Post by middleoftheboothen on Feb 17, 2024 20:12:42 GMT
To give young Lowe the same mark as Hoever who handed them the win on the plate is questionable to say the least. The lad was on his own up front feeding off scraps but still gave it everything. Just a bit harsh I think there mate. He was so invisible I'm not sure I would have noticed if we played with nobody up front to be honest. He wasn't great mate by any stretch but he hadn't asked to play up top alone had he? He's a young lad who gave it his best shot and put himself about. Just thought giving him the same mark as Hoever was a wee bit harsh mate. |
|
|
|
Post by shrewspotter on Feb 17, 2024 20:15:57 GMT
Bonham 6 looks shakey when asked to use his feet
Hoever 4 cannot overlook the error
Wilmot 6 didn't do a lot wrong
Rose 6 defended well but needs to do better with the 2 headers
Gooch 6 industrious as you'd expect but could offer more
Thompson 6 wish he'd swing the ball in now and again
Pearson 7 unlucky to get hooked I thought
Baker 7 another good game
Cundle 8 motm good link up play
Laurent 4 thought he slowed things up, very poor
Lowe 5 not ready sorry
Burger 7 great tempo
Junior 6 added stability
Ennis 7 must start
Junho 7 must start
Maenhoff 7 looked dangerous
|
|
|
|
Post by musik on Feb 17, 2024 20:16:45 GMT
Hmm.
I didn't see the game.
But why no forwards in the line up?
🙄
|
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Feb 17, 2024 20:36:19 GMT
He was so invisible I'm not sure I would have noticed if we played with nobody up front to be honest. He wasn't great mate by any stretch but he hadn't asked to play up top alone had he? He's a young lad who gave it his best shot and put himself about. Just thought giving him the same mark as Hoever was a wee bit harsh mate. I agree he wasn't up to the task given, but I can't give him points for things he didn't do anyway! He was almost invisible, and in truth he contributed even less than Hoever who lost us another game! |
|
|
|
Post by emretezzy on Feb 17, 2024 20:36:25 GMT
OOP - Out of Postion
Bonham- 5
Thompson - 7 OOP
Rose - 7
Wilmot - 6
Hoever - 3 (6 without the gift)
Gooch - 5
Pearson - 4
Baker - 6
Cundle - 4
Laurent - 5 OOP
Lowe - 2
|
|
|
|
Post by emretezzy on Feb 17, 2024 20:37:42 GMT
To give young Lowe the same mark as Hoever who handed them the win on the plate is questionable to say the least. The lad was on his own up front feeding off scraps but still gave it everything. Just a bit harsh I think there mate. He was so invisible I'm not sure I would have noticed if we played with nobody up front to be honest. Absolutely spot on R.E Lowe. The minimum of a young striker is effort. He rocked round like an Under 23 game where he thought he was the best player. Their defenders won't have had an easier game all season... or next. |
|
|
|
Post by middleoftheboothen on Feb 17, 2024 20:42:53 GMT
He wasn't great mate by any stretch but he hadn't asked to play up top alone had he? He's a young lad who gave it his best shot and put himself about. Just thought giving him the same mark as Hoever was a wee bit harsh mate. I agree he wasn't up to the task given, but I can't give him points for things he didn't do anyway! He was almost invisible, and in truth he contributed even less than Hoever who lost us another game! He was thrown in at the deep end for me today and did what he could with the limited and often shit service he had. Just think that Hoever's decision to cut inside instead of playing it down the line cost us the game. All opinions though ofcourse mate. |
|
|
|
Post by middleoftheboothen on Feb 17, 2024 20:45:05 GMT
He was so invisible I'm not sure I would have noticed if we played with nobody up front to be honest. Absolutely spot on R.E Lowe. The minimum of a young striker is effort. He rocked round like an Under 23 game where he thought he was the best player. Their defenders won't have had an easier game all season... or next. You actually think that it's due to lack of effort? Or maybe the fact that the lad isn't up to leading the line yet on his own in the championship? |
|
|
|
Post by kjpt140v on Feb 17, 2024 20:47:33 GMT
Bonham 6
Gooch 6
Hoever 6
Rose 5
Wilmot 5
Thompson 6
Pearson 5
Baker 5
Cundle 6
Laurent 6
Lowe 5
Burger 6
Manhoef 6
Junho 8
Junior 6
Ennis 6
Referee 3
|
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Feb 17, 2024 21:56:55 GMT
Bonham 6 Gooch 6 Hoever 4 Rose 6 Wilmot 6 Thompson 6 Pearson 5 Baker 7 Cundle 7 Laurent 5 Lowe 5 Burger 6 Manhoef 6 Junho 7 Junior 6 Ennis 6 Referee 3 Gouranga.  |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 17, 2024 22:07:39 GMT
Bonham 6
Hoever 1
Wilmot 5
Rose 5
Thompson 5
Gooch3
Pearson 3
Baker 6
Cundle 4
Laurent 3
Lowe 4
|
|
|
|
Post by emretezzy on Feb 17, 2024 22:42:45 GMT
Absolutely spot on R.E Lowe. The minimum of a young striker is effort. He rocked round like an Under 23 game where he thought he was the best player. Their defenders won't have had an easier game all season... or next. You actually think that it's due to lack of effort? Or maybe the fact that the lad isn't up to leading the line yet on his own in the championship? 60/40 today mate. He is clearly a talented footballer. I just thought he should have ran himself into the ground today. He barley broke sweat. |
|
|
|
Post by roylandstoke on Feb 17, 2024 22:50:50 GMT
I thought we played OKagsinst a decent Coventry side.
Bonham 7 did nothing wrong and dealt with some shocking psss backs
Hoever 3 (loses 3 for…)
Rose 6 - should have got one on target at least
Wilmot 5
Thompson 7
Gooch 5 works hard little quality
Pearson 4 nowhere near last season’s influence
Baker 7 decent throughout improved when the first team came on
Laurent 7 one of his better games
Cundle 6 works hard
Lowe 3 no impact and took way too long to get a poor shot away when he did get a chance
Burger 7 must start whenever he is able to run
Junho 7 but needs to work on his final pass - must start
Junior 6 must start- full back
Ennis 6 appears to be the only credible striker the manager trusts
Manhoef 5 I really hope he’s going to get better
Our best 11 could have got something from that game.
|
|
|
|
Post by fazza90 on Feb 17, 2024 23:19:49 GMT
Thompson - 8 very good, up and down
Gooch - 7 see Thompson but without the decent passing. Fantastic tackle first half.
Laurent - 6.5 showed some much needed harassing and fight without much quality
Cundle - 6.5 see Laurent
Pearson - 6.5 good to see the performance from him today, seemed more 'on it' than in recent weeks.
Burger - 6.5 very good cameo
Junho - 6.5 very good cameo. Love this guy!
Baker - 6 ok
Rose - 6 ok. Would have been a 7 if he got his headers on target
Wilmot - 6. A bit shaky but did make a fantastic goal line clearance!
Bonham - 6 not a lot to do. Some dodgy kicking
Junior - 6 tried but nothing came off
Manhoef - 6 see above. But good to see him take a few players on
Jessica - 5.5 didn't do much
Lowe - 5 ran around but zero impact. Not his fault, needs a loan
Hoever - 3 sadly his awful decision making cost us the game
|
|
|
|
Post by thedeadlyshart on Feb 18, 2024 0:09:36 GMT
Bonham 5
Hoever 0
Wilmot 5
Rose 4
Thompson 4
Gooch 6
Pearson 5
Laurent 5
Cundle 5
Baker 6
Lowe 3
Burger 6
Junho 5
Junior 5
Ennis 5
Manhoef 6
|
|
|
|
Post by cheadlepotter on Feb 18, 2024 0:15:28 GMT
Bonham 6
Hoever 4
Wilmot 6
Rose 5
Gooch 5
Pearson 5
Baker 6
Thompson 5
Laurent 6
Cundle 5
Lowe 5
Burger 6.5
Junho 6
Tchamadeu 6
Ennis 5
Manhoef 6.5
|
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Feb 18, 2024 0:23:04 GMT
Bonham 6 Gooch 6 Hoever 4 Rose 6 Wilmot 6 Thompson 6 Pearson 5 Baker 7 Cundle 7 Laurent 5 Lowe 5 Burger 6 Manhoef 6 Junho 7 Junior 6 Ennis 6 Referee 3 Gouranga. Pretty much how i saw it Albert. Maybe Rose 5 for the missed headers. |
|
|
|
Post by biddulphchav on Feb 18, 2024 2:32:53 GMT
I agree he wasn't up to the task given, but I can't give him points for things he didn't do anyway! He was almost invisible, and in truth he contributed even less than Hoever who lost us another game! He was thrown in at the deep end for me today and did what he could with the limited and often shit service he had. Just think that Hoever's decision to cut inside instead of playing it down the line cost us the game. All opinions though ofcourse mate. You’ve got to rate him as you would any other player. He had little to no impact, and although he was thrown in at the deep end - that’s the net result. The manager should not have put us in a position where Lowe is having to do this in a home game when we need the points. |
|
|
|
Post by a on Feb 18, 2024 8:32:32 GMT
He was thrown in at the deep end for me today and did what he could with the limited and often shit service he had. Just think that Hoever's decision to cut inside instead of playing it down the line cost us the game. All opinions though ofcourse mate. You’ve got to rate him as you would any other player. He had little to no impact, and although he was thrown in at the deep end - that’s the net result. The manager should not have put us in a position where Lowe is having to do this in a home game when we need the points. I agree with you there, I’m not for castigating youth players but if they’re going to play they need to be ready. The first 11 isn’t where you play your youth players in make or break games when they need to develop, that’s what a loan to another club is for. He needs to go out on loan and we need to start prioritising points over loyalty at this point. |
|
