|
Post by ravey123 on Feb 10, 2024 17:12:37 GMT
Iverson 4 Gooch 4 Junior 5 McNally Wilmot 4 Johnson 3 Bae 5 Burger 6 Vidigal 4 Million 4 Ennis 4
Wesley 4 Haks 3 Baker 4 Cundle 4 Hoever 4
|
|
|
Post by thepottypotter on Feb 10, 2024 17:15:23 GMT
Iverson 4 Gooch 4 Junior 5 McNally Wilmot 4 Johnson 3 Bae 5 Burger 6 Vidigal 4 Million 4 Ennis 4 Wesley 4 Haks 3 Baker 4 Cundle 4 Hoever 4 Very generous scores. Especially for the defence. I can’t be bothered to rate the shower this week.
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Feb 10, 2024 17:15:54 GMT
Iverson 3 Gooch 3 Junior 5 McNally 4 Wilmot 4 Johnson 1 Bae 6 Burger 7 Vidigal 4 Million 4 Ennis 5
Wesley 4 Haks 3 Baker 4 Cundle 3 Hoever 4
|
|
|
Post by LL Cool Dave on Feb 10, 2024 17:18:48 GMT
Thought Vidigal had a decent second half.
|
|
|
Post by Pricey on Feb 10, 2024 17:19:39 GMT
I don't think you can rate players after that kind of performance because it was so drab. No one stood out at all.
|
|
|
Post by staffordpotter78 on Feb 10, 2024 17:22:08 GMT
Can't be arsed to rate them after that, but whatever you want it to be give Burger +2 ahead of the others and Iversen, McNally, Wilmott, Johnson & Vidigal -2. Absolutely shocking performance which has only been made semi-bearable listening to folks have comic meltdowns on the coach home
|
|
|
Post by Pricey on Feb 10, 2024 17:23:36 GMT
Can't be arsed to rate them after that, but whatever you want it to be give Burger +2 ahead of the others and Iversen, McNally, Wilmott, Johnson & Vidigal -2. Absolutely shocking performance which has only been made semi-bearable listening to folks have comic meltdowns on the coach home Let's have a comic meltdown quote or two then.
|
|
|
Post by svengaliinplatforms on Feb 10, 2024 17:24:51 GMT
Iverson 5 Gooch 3 Junior 3 McNally 2 Wilmot 3 Johnson 1 Bae 5 Burger 6 - MOM Vidigal 3 Million 3 Ennis 3
Wesley 3 Haks 3 Baker 3 Cundle 3 Hoever 3
|
|
|
Post by roylandstoke on Feb 10, 2024 17:25:39 GMT
Iversen 5 Gooch 3 McNally 4 Wilmot 4 Burger 6 Johnson 1 generous Jun Ho 5 Million 3 Ennis 5 Vidigal 4
Subs 4 Haks can’t be arsed
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Feb 10, 2024 17:47:44 GMT
Iverson 5 I genuinly prefer Bonham Gooch 4 Not a fullback Junior 5 Poorest I’ve seen him McNally 4 So slow and technically poor Wilmot 4 I don’t mind him but he was bad today Johnson 3 bad as could be and cost us at least by missing that pen as they would have been on the ropes. Just hit it hard when you try and do clever stuff like that you look an idiot when you miss Bae 6 Did ok but not much around him Burger 7 Too good for us only one with bottle Vidigal 4 Plays like a petulant child. No guts Million 4 Had no impact Ennis 5 Took his goal well but had no support
Wesley 4 Haks 4 Baker 5 Cundle 6 Thought he did ok when he came on Hoever 5 better than Gooch
|
|
|
Post by Edward Tattsyrup on Feb 10, 2024 17:48:44 GMT
Burger 6 all the rest Booooooo
|
|
|
Post by peepin on Feb 10, 2024 17:51:23 GMT
I think you could only rate the players for the first half performance. Blackburn had took the foot right off the gas after going 3-0 up and so they should. You put in 30 minutes of hard work against us and the job is done.
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Feb 10, 2024 17:51:32 GMT
Iversen 6 Tchamadeu 3 McNally 4 Wilmot 4 Gooch 4 Burger 7 Johnson 2 Junho 5 Manhoef 5 Vidigal 5 Ennis 5
Hoever 5 Baker 4 Cundle 5 Wes 4
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Feb 10, 2024 18:04:18 GMT
I'll give them all the same amount as goals conceded.
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Feb 10, 2024 19:40:51 GMT
Burger 6 Bae Jun-Ho 5
The rest 4
|
|
|
Post by willieeetmiout on Feb 10, 2024 19:43:30 GMT
Iverson 2 Gooch -10 Junior 4 McNally 1 Wilmot 1 Johnson 1 Bae 3 Burger 4 Vidigal 3 Million 1 Ennis 2
|
|
|
Post by idle on Feb 10, 2024 19:43:34 GMT
Burger 6 Bae Jun-Ho 5 The rest 4 Ennis don't get any for the goal? I thought is was well taken.
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Feb 10, 2024 19:44:41 GMT
Burger 6 Bae Jun-Ho 5 The rest 4 Ennis don't get any for the goal? I thought is was well taken. Thought about that, but it was offset by the fact he couldn’t trap an anvil…..
|
|
|
Post by thedeadlyshart on Feb 10, 2024 19:49:24 GMT
Iverson 4 Junior 2 McNally 3 Wilmot 2 Gooch 3 Burger 5 Johnson 2 Junho 6 Manhoef 4 Vidigal 5 Ennis 6
Baker 4 Hoever 5 Cundle 4 Haks 3 Wesley 3
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Feb 10, 2024 21:48:53 GMT
Iverson 4 Gooch 3 Junior 5 McNally 2 Wilmot 4 Johnson 2 Bae 4 Burger 6 Vidigal 5 Million 4 Ennis 6 Wesley 3 Haks 4 Baker 4 Cundle 4 Hoever 4 Gouranga.
|
|
|
Post by pushon on Feb 10, 2024 23:17:16 GMT
Iversen 6 Tchamadeu 3 McNally 4 Wilmot 4 Gooch 4 Burger 7 Johnson 2 Junho 5 Manhoef 5 Vidigal 5 Ennis 5 Hoever 5 Baker 4 Cundle 5 Wes 4 I don’t usually do player ratings, but after todays (none)performance, I'll agree with this as my best opinion.
|
|
|
Post by maine on Feb 11, 2024 0:11:12 GMT
Iverson 5 Less convincing than Bonham was last week Gooch 4 Looked out of position. 2 poor matches in a row. Tries though. Junior 5 Poor control, one foot, energetic at least McNally 3. Terrible today Wilmot 6.. Not a fan, but he's far from the worst of our defensive problems. Johnson 5. Ineffective today, but gets a bit too much stick. He's a pretty neat and tidy player usually Bae 6. Not involved enough, but at some point one feels he's just got to totally take off. Burger 7 Best player today by some way. Vidigal Actually quite impressed by his skill and commitment for the first 75 minutes or so Million 4 Pretty lame debut Ennis 5 Good goal but little else
Wesley 4 Haks 3 Baker 4 Cundle 4 Hoever 6. Best of the subs today
|
|
|
Post by malteser68 on Feb 11, 2024 0:40:11 GMT
Johnson is the worst player I’ve seen in ages
|
|
|
Post by cyprus1stokey on Feb 11, 2024 13:07:18 GMT
Him and Wesley absolute crap.
|
|
|
Post by dutchstokie on Feb 11, 2024 13:08:54 GMT
Burger 5
The rest, 3 at a push
|
|
|
Post by Club1863 on Feb 11, 2024 13:12:42 GMT
Thought Vidigal had a decent second half. I’m glad I didn’t catch the first half then because almost every ball that was played to him in the 2nd half went out quite tamely
|
|
|
Post by Fred Merger on Feb 11, 2024 13:22:28 GMT
Johnson is the worst player I’ve seen in ages There's plenty of competition but he stands out for sure. For what reason did he start I'd like to know?
|
|