|
|
Post by cheadlepotter on Oct 18, 2022 21:13:51 GMT
Bursik 5 - we’ll never go up with him in goal
Sterling 7 - good movement and passing
Jagielka 8 - dominant in the air and passing good too
Wilmot 7 - quiet game, looked to move ball forward
Fox 6 - steady enough, delivery could have been better
Baker 5 - set pieces were pants
Laurent 6 - didn’t notice him and we dominated possession
Campbell 5 - on target plenty but easy saves
Gayle 6 - not many would have the class for that through ball but quiet otherwise
Delap 5 - more sitters missed
Fosu 6 - plenty of effort, delivery not great and was going down easily and wasting possession
Powell 6
DWP 6
Brown 5 - fuck me, if he’d played like that for 90 minutes he’d do well to get a 3
Clarke 6
Thompson 6
|
|
josefr
Youth Player
Posts: 296
|
Post by josefr on Oct 18, 2022 21:15:56 GMT
Bursik 4
Sterling 5
Jagielka 6
Fox 5
Baker 4
Laurent 4
Campbell 3
Gayle 3
Delap 3
Fosu 6
Powell 5
DWP 4
Brown 3
Clarke 4
Thompson 4
|
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Oct 18, 2022 21:19:58 GMT
Bursik 5
Wilmot 5
Jagielka 5
Fox 5
Sterling 5
Baker 5
Laurent 4
Fosu 6
Campbell 6
Delap 5
Gayle 4
Thompson 6
Powell 5
Brown 5
Clarke 5
|
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Oct 18, 2022 21:21:22 GMT
Baker and Laurent 5.
The rest 6.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Oct 18, 2022 21:23:10 GMT
All deserve a 7 tonight.
Good performance but once we went a goal down was always difficult with their defensive record.
|
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Oct 18, 2022 21:24:14 GMT
Bursik 4 Sterling 5 Jagielka 6 Fox 5 Baker 4 Laurent 4 Campbell 3 Gayle 3 Delap 3 Fosu 6 Powell 5 DWP 4 Brown 3 Clarke 4 Thompson 4 Thompson put two peach crosses in |
|
|
|
Post by thepottypotter on Oct 18, 2022 21:25:17 GMT
Bursik 7
Sterling 7
Jagielka 8
Wilmot 7
Fox 7
Baker 6
Laurent 6.5
Campbell 5
Gayle 6
Delap 5
Fosu 6.5
Powell 7
DWP 5
Brown 6
Clarke 7
Thompson 7
|
|
|
|
Post by willieeetmiout on Oct 18, 2022 21:27:06 GMT
Bursik 6
Wilmot 6
Jagielka 6
Fox 6
Above were spectators for most of the game.
Sterling 6 - looked threatening on occasion but flattered to deceive.
Baker 4 - really poor tonight including his set pieces
Laurent 4 - so anonymous for most of the game. Not really needed once they put 11 men behind the ball after 10 mins
Fosu 6 - tried but struggled.
Campbell 7 - easily our best player. Should have scored that header.
Delap 6 - look better with him in the team than not.
Gayle 4 - okay first half but awful second half
Thompson 6 - odd sub
Powell 6 - unlucky with the header
Brown 3 - back to the old JB. Falling over, miscontrolling and a wild swing at a decent opportunity in the closing stages.
Clarke 5 - odd sub
DWP 5 - not sure what his best position is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Milkie on Oct 18, 2022 21:27:32 GMT
Bursik 6 unsighted for the goal
Sterling 6 linked play but no real cutting edge
Jagielka 7 Organised us well
Wilmot 6 Standard day at the office
Fox 6 hit the first man with 2 many crosses
Baker 6 became more desperate as time passed
Laurent 6 standard day at that office
Campbell 6 decision making and shooting🤦♂️
Gayle 5 to deep for me, needs a goal
Delap 6 handful but lacks guile
Fosu 6 effort a plenty little imagination
Powell 5 no impact
DWP 6 good effort
Brown 5 looked rusty
Clarke 5 added no quality
Thompson 6 steady performance
|
|
|
|
Post by chad on Oct 18, 2022 21:28:28 GMT
Some poor marks there for what was overall a good performance. No one deserved less than 7. And I’d give Jags Fosu and Campbell 8s
|
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Oct 18, 2022 21:29:14 GMT
Bursik 6
Sterling 8
Jagielka 7
Wilmot 7
Fox 7
Baker 6
Laurent 7
Campbell 7
Gayle 6.5
Delap 6
Fosu 8.5
Powell 7
DWP 6
Brown 6
Clarke 6
Thompson 7
|
|
|
|
Post by thehartshillbadger on Oct 18, 2022 21:35:14 GMT
Bursik 6 Wilmot 6 Jagielka 6 Fox 6 Above were spectators for most of the game. Sterling 6 - looked threatening on occasion but flattered to deceive. Baker 4 - really poor tonight including his set pieces Laurent 4 - so anonymous for most of the game. Not really needed once they put 11 men behind the ball after 10 mins Fosu 6 - tried but struggled. Campbell 7 - easily our best player. Should have scored that header. Delap 6 - look better with him in the team than not. Gayle 4 - okay first half but awful second half Thompson 6 - odd sub Powell 6 - unlucky with the header Brown 3 - back to the old JB. Falling over, miscontrolling and a wild swing at a decent opportunity in the closing stages. Clarke 5 - odd sub DWP 5 - not sure what his best position is. Your description of Brown was basically Campbell. Although I thought Campbell played generally ok overall his shooting, and decision making was absolutely woeful |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Oct 18, 2022 21:37:34 GMT
No one less than 6 and most at least 7 however understand marking down for the poor finishing
Overall I thought we were better tonight than vast majority of our matches
|
|
josefr
Youth Player
Posts: 296
|
Post by josefr on Oct 18, 2022 21:38:46 GMT
Bursik 4 Sterling 5 Jagielka 6 Fox 5 Baker 4 Laurent 4 Campbell 3 Gayle 3 Delap 3 Fosu 6 Powell 5 DWP 4 Brown 3 Clarke 4 Thompson 4 Thompson put two peach crosses in More so that it was a weird sub, Thompson is only an option when holding onto a lead tbh. Ok player. |
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Oct 18, 2022 21:42:13 GMT
Bursik 5
Sterling 7
Jagielka 8
Wilmot 7
Fox 7
Baker 6
Laurent 6
Campbell 5
Gayle 6
Delap 5
Fosu 7
Powell 6
DWP 5
Brown 5
Clarke 5
Thompson 6
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Oct 18, 2022 22:00:02 GMT
Marks until the 73rd minute:
Bursik 6
Sterling 6
Wilmot 8
Jagielka 7
Fox 7
Laurent 4
Baker 4
Gayle 4
Fosu 6
Campbell 5
Delap 4
|
|
|
|
Post by LL Cool Dave on Oct 18, 2022 22:01:35 GMT
Bursik 4 Sterling 5 Jagielka 6 Fox 5 Baker 4 Laurent 4 Campbell 3 Gayle 3 Delap 3 Fosu 6 Powell 5 DWP 4 Brown 3 Clarke 4 Thompson 4 28 shots |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Oct 18, 2022 22:02:31 GMT
Bursik 4 Sterling 5 Jagielka 6 Fox 5 Baker 4 Laurent 4 Campbell 3 Gayle 3 Delap 3 Fosu 6 Powell 5 DWP 4 Brown 3 Clarke 4 Thompson 4 28 shots And 0 goals - a good argument for low marks. |
|
|
|
Post by gawa on Oct 18, 2022 22:03:29 GMT
Some very negative marks here. Don't think the players played badly at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gary Hackett on Oct 18, 2022 22:08:18 GMT
No one less than 6 and most at least 7 however understand marking down for the poor finishing Overall I thought we were better tonight than vast majority of our matches Yeah, I enjoyed the game tonight a lot more than the rubbish O'Neill was serving up for the past 2 seasons even if we got beat. |
|
|
|
Post by UsAndThem on Oct 18, 2022 22:12:27 GMT
And 0 goals - a good argument for low marks. Just playing devils advocate here for a second… I have seen countless remarks on here before now when we have ground out a 0-0 draw and played god awful football or scraped a horrible 1-0 win where we have been under the cosh all night (just like Rotherham tonight) and people have said that they would prefer to watch attacking football, have a go and get beat than watch us play ‘Pulis ball’ or negative/defensive football. What would your opinion be on that? As there can’t be an argument that we didn’t try and attack, create and go for it. The proverbial kitchen sink was thrown tonight to try and get the win (maybe apart from the Clarke substitution but he scored last time we did that) |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Oct 18, 2022 22:14:43 GMT
And 0 goals - a good argument for low marks. Just playing devils advocate here for a second… I have seen countless remarks on here before now when we have ground out a 0-0 draw and played god awful football or scraped a horrible 1-0 win where we have been under the cosh all night (just like Rotherham tonight) and people have said that they would prefer to watch attacking football, have a go and get beat than watch us play ‘Pulis ball’ or negative/defensive football. What would your opinion be on that? As there can’t be an argument that we didn’t try and attack, create and go for it. The proverbial kitchen sink was thrown tonight to try and get the win (maybe apart from the Clarke substitution but he scored last time we did that) You can still mark them though for not doing their job though. We lost today because of terrible finishing. |
|
|
|
Post by dwr17477 on Oct 18, 2022 22:23:04 GMT
Bursik 6
Sterling 7 like this guy, looks threatening
Jagielka 8
Wilmot 7
Fox 7
Baker 6
Laurent 6.5
Campbell 5 just not his night
Gayle 6
Delap 5 showed some glimpses second half but free header miss was very poor
Fosu 6.5 falls over too much but think he'll score soon
Powell 7 great header but great save
DWP 6
Brown 6
Clarke 6
Thompson 7 two great crosses at the end
Team effort 8
|
|
|
|
Post by UsAndThem on Oct 18, 2022 22:23:54 GMT
Just playing devils advocate here for a second… I have seen countless remarks on here before now when we have ground out a 0-0 draw and played god awful football or scraped a horrible 1-0 win where we have been under the cosh all night (just like Rotherham tonight) and people have said that they would prefer to watch attacking football, have a go and get beat than watch us play ‘Pulis ball’ or negative/defensive football. What would your opinion be on that? As there can’t be an argument that we didn’t try and attack, create and go for it. The proverbial kitchen sink was thrown tonight to try and get the win (maybe apart from the Clarke substitution but he scored last time we did that) You can still mark them though for not doing their job though. We lost today because of terrible finishing. I agree to a certain extent that we lost because of terrible finishing. I have said on a different thread that it says a lot that our defenders have scored more goals than our forwards. However, it’s like you can’t win sometimes. People calling for exciting attacking football, which is what they got tonight. We just weren’t clinical. I’d much rather this than holding on week in week out and scraping 0-0 draws. There’s more positives from tonight that negatives and the player ratings above I think are very harsh. You don’t have 28 shots and 12 on target and concede something like 4 shot and 1 on target and lose very often. It’s just one of those things. Another night it could have been 4-1 to us. |
|
|
|
Post by kjpt140v on Oct 18, 2022 22:24:51 GMT
Bursik 6
Sterling 7
Jagielka 8
Fox 7
Baker 7
Laurent 7
Campbell 7
Gayle 7
Delap 6
Fosu 8
Powell 6
DWP 5
Brown 5
Clarke 5
Thompson 6
Referee 2
|
|
|
|
Post by greenhoff on Oct 18, 2022 22:27:35 GMT
Bursik 6....Not at fault for the goal
Sterling 6...OK, want more from him
Wilmot 8...Excellent performance
Jags 7...Defies his age
Fox 6....Solid game
Baker 5...poor set pieces,casual at times
Laurent 5...can do more
Gayle 5...needs to score.
Delap 5...tad disappointed to be honest
Fosu 6...need more end product
Campbell 7...could have had a hat trick
Subs
Clarke 5...strange sub
Powell 7...remains our best player imo
Brown 5...improved but lacks quality
Thompson 7...Two great crosses
DWP 5...needs loaning
|
|
|
|
Post by UsAndThem on Oct 18, 2022 22:40:31 GMT
Bursik 6 Sterling 7 Jagielka 8 Fox 7 Baker 7 Laurent 7 Campbell 7 Gayle 7 Delap 6 Fosu 8 Powell 6 DWP 5 Brown 5 Clarke 5 Thompson 6 Referee 2 I’d agree with most of those ratings. Fair and balanced. Don’t think Powell did much to deserve a 6 but he’s obviously quite rusty. |
|
|
|
Post by loosestools on Oct 18, 2022 22:48:22 GMT
Bursik 6....Not at fault for the goal Sterling 6...OK, want more from him Wilmot 8...Excellent performance Jags 7...Defies his age Fox 6....Solid game Baker 5...poor set pieces,casual at times Laurent 5...can do more Gayle 5...needs to score. Delap 5...tad disappointed to be honest Fosu 6...need more end product Campbell 7...could have had a hat trick Subs Clarke 5...strange sub Powell 7...remains our best player imo Brown 5...improved but lacks quality Thompson 7...Two great crosses DWP 5...needs loaning That is a fair summation. |
|
|
|
Post by loosestools on Oct 18, 2022 22:49:06 GMT
Bursik 6 Sterling 7 Jagielka 8 Fox 7 Baker 7 Laurent 7 Campbell 7 Gayle 7 Delap 6 Fosu 8 Powell 6 DWP 5 Brown 5 Clarke 5 Thompson 6 Referee 2 I’d agree with most of those ratings. Fair and balanced. Don’t think Powell did much to deserve a 6 but he’s obviously quite rusty. Powell was class when he came on. |
|
|
|
Post by dirtygary69 on Oct 18, 2022 22:51:26 GMT
I thought Wilmot was our best player to be honest. He wasn’t up against much but he absolutely dominated everything.
Bursik - 6 (not sure he did much wrong but nothing to do otherwise)
Sterling - 6
Jagielka - 7
Wilmot - 8
Fox - 7
Baker - 7
Laurent - 7
Fosu - 7
Gayle - 6
Campbell - 7
Delap - 6
Powell - 7
Clarke - 5
Thompson - 7
DWP - 6
Brown - 5
|
|
