|
|
Post by stayingupforbigbazza on Jan 29, 2022 3:00:55 GMT
Did anyone understand his post match interview on sky especially re their blatant sending off and penalty for us ??
|
|
|
|
Post by Anto1962 on Jan 29, 2022 8:55:29 GMT
It was like listening to a politician, he completely waffled around the point and gave no answer whatsoever, he also rivalled Steve Cooper in the ugly stakes. 🤣🤣
|
|
|
|
Post by questionable on Jan 29, 2022 8:58:49 GMT
100% a three match ban on its way, there was absolutely no intention of him going for the ball, I hope he’s just stupid putting his foot in rather than him intentionally trying to snap his leg.
Our players didn’t really make a massive fuss if the incident which was disappointing to me.
|
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Jan 29, 2022 9:04:50 GMT
100% a three match ban on its way, there was absolutely no intention of him going for the ball, I hope he’s just stupid putting his foot in rather than him intentionally trying to snap his leg. Our players didn’t really make a massive fuss if the incident which was disappointing to me. No retrospective action is allowed, because the ref saw the incident. Shit rule I know…… |
|
|
|
Post by wuzza on Jan 29, 2022 9:15:04 GMT
Did anyone understand his post match interview on sky especially re their blatant sending off and penalty for us ?? Reminded me of a sketch off the Fast Show or some such. Each sentence seemed to start off in some sort English and then rapidly transformed into something which Im guessing was related to Spanish ! Top stuff. |
|
|
|
Post by MilanStokie on Jan 29, 2022 9:18:41 GMT
100% a three match ban on its way, there was absolutely no intention of him going for the ball, I hope he’s just stupid putting his foot in rather than him intentionally trying to snap his leg. Our players didn’t really make a massive fuss if the incident which was disappointing to me. No retrospective action is allowed, because the ref saw the incident. Shit rule I know…… Surely they can override it in special cases, that's one of the worst tackles you are likely to see. |
|
|
|
Post by xchpotter on Jan 29, 2022 9:19:16 GMT
Did anyone understand his post match interview on sky especially re their blatant sending off and penalty for us ?? Reminded me of a sketch off the Fast Show or some such. Each sentence seemed to start off in some sort English and then rapidly transformed into something which Im guessing was related to Spanish ! Top stuff. Or this bloke…. |
|
|
|
Post by brotherleelove on Jan 29, 2022 9:21:38 GMT
Did anyone understand his post match interview on sky especially re their blatant sending off and penalty for us ?? How many managers openly admit one of their own players should have been sent off ? |
|
|
|
Post by scfcno1fan on Jan 29, 2022 9:23:00 GMT
100% a three match ban on its way, there was absolutely no intention of him going for the ball, I hope he’s just stupid putting his foot in rather than him intentionally trying to snap his leg. Our players didn’t really make a massive fuss if the incident which was disappointing to me. No retrospective action is allowed, because the ref saw the incident. Shit rule I know…… The fact he saw it causes so many questions. I swear he mouthed I didn’t see it at HT as well. |
|
|
|
Post by chuckrocky on Jan 29, 2022 9:31:41 GMT
He’s doing a very good job there. Inherited a side in a very similar predicament to ourselves and has had even less money to work with.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stoke711 on Jan 29, 2022 11:44:17 GMT
100% a three match ban on its way, there was absolutely no intention of him going for the ball, I hope he’s just stupid putting his foot in rather than him intentionally trying to snap his leg. Our players didn’t really make a massive fuss if the incident which was disappointing to me. No retrospective action is allowed, because the ref saw the incident. Shit rule I know…… Surely no way he can say he saw it as he gave them a throw in. |
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Jan 29, 2022 12:44:59 GMT
No retrospective action is allowed, because the ref saw the incident. Shit rule I know…… Surely no way he can say he saw it as he gave them a throw in. If he saw it then he needs sacking simple as. |
|
|
|
Post by nonameface on Jan 29, 2022 12:50:13 GMT
100% a three match ban on its way, there was absolutely no intention of him going for the ball, I hope he’s just stupid putting his foot in rather than him intentionally trying to snap his leg. Our players didn’t really make a massive fuss if the incident which was disappointing to me. No retrospective action is allowed, because the ref saw the incident. Shit rule I know…… Has this been confirmed? I cant imagine any ref seeing that and thinking it isn't a red card. Either the player gets a ban because it wasn't seen, or the ref does because its an awful decision if he saw it, or both get a ban for an awful tackle and an awful ref performance; it was on sky there is no where for them to hide. |
|
|
|
Post by lordb on Jan 29, 2022 12:54:40 GMT
No retrospective action is allowed, because the ref saw the incident. Shit rule I know…… Has this been confirmed? I cant imagine any ref seeing that and thinking it isn't a red card. Either the player gets a ban because it wasn't seen, or the ref does because its an awful decision if he saw it, or both get a ban for an awful tackle and an awful ref performance; it was on sky there is no where for them to hide. He gave the foul so he saw it |
|
|
|
Post by gaznandi on Jan 29, 2022 12:58:34 GMT
Has this been confirmed? I cant imagine any ref seeing that and thinking it isn't a red card. Either the player gets a ban because it wasn't seen, or the ref does because its an awful decision if he saw it, or both get a ban for an awful tackle and an awful ref performance; it was on sky there is no where for them to hide. He gave the foul so he saw it I thought he gave them a throw in? |
|
|
|
Post by apb1 on Jan 29, 2022 13:45:30 GMT
Apparently a foul was given - look at p2 of the live text comms from BBC www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/60078325 But it seems to be a nonsense that because he saw 'a foul' Koroma is unable to retrospectively be punished for a horror tackle which the fucking clown didn't see. |
|
|
|
Post by scfc75 on Jan 29, 2022 13:53:10 GMT
Has this been confirmed? I cant imagine any ref seeing that and thinking it isn't a red card. Either the player gets a ban because it wasn't seen, or the ref does because its an awful decision if he saw it, or both get a ban for an awful tackle and an awful ref performance; it was on sky there is no where for them to hide. He gave the foul so he saw it He was looking straight at it so he definitely saw it, foul or not!! |
|
|
|
Post by citynickscfc on Jan 29, 2022 13:53:41 GMT
Apparently a foul was given - look at p2 of the live text comms from BBC www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/60078325 But it seems to be a nonsense that because he saw 'a foul' Koroma is unable to retrospectively be punished for a horror tackle which the fucking clown didn't see. Referees on a power trip, afraid of losing their ability to manipulate outcomes. That's all I see. As I said a fucking computer could do a much better job. Get rid, bring in a much simpler and justified version of VAR without all of this bullshit that referees can influence. They are wank across the board. |
|
|
|
Post by spitthedog on Jan 29, 2022 13:53:52 GMT
100% a three match ban on its way, there was absolutely no intention of him going for the ball, I hope he’s just stupid putting his foot in rather than him intentionally trying to snap his leg. Our players didn’t really make a massive fuss if the incident which was disappointing to me. No retrospective action is allowed, because the ref saw the incident. Shit rule I know…… It's an interesting concept that he somehow saw the incident. Because he clearly didn't see the incident! Do you think if he watched it back he would be saying. Yep, I saw that! Retrospective action needs to be taken against the ref because he is a danger to the players with decision making like this. |
|
|
|
Post by Stoke711 on Jan 29, 2022 13:56:18 GMT
Surely no way he can say he saw it as he gave them a throw in. If he saw it then he needs sacking simple as. Missing 2 red cards is very bad. At half time, he should have been aware he should have sent their player off. So to only book the 2nd red card was really absymal officiating. I guarentee if the other way round we'd be playing with 9 men and the country remarking how dirty we are. Nothing has been said that Huddersfield are dirty or anything. Seems to be only certain sides get tarnished with this brush. Too many refs go into games with preconceptions about teams and officiate accordingly. |
|
|
|
Post by Stoke711 on Jan 29, 2022 13:56:57 GMT
He gave the foul so he saw it I thought he gave them a throw in? He did, he gave them a throw in |
|
|
|
Post by realstokebloke on Jan 29, 2022 14:29:06 GMT
Bielsa lite is a knob.
|
|
|
|
Post by stayingupforbigbazza on Jan 29, 2022 18:22:03 GMT
Did anyone understand his post match interview on sky especially re their blatant sending off and penalty for us ?? Reminded me of a sketch off the Fast Show or some such. Each sentence seemed to start off in some sort English and then rapidly transformed into something which Im guessing was related to Spanish ! Top stuff. Heth Heth Heth Chrissie Waddle Butros Butros Garli ?? |
|
|
|
Post by whatsashig on Jan 29, 2022 18:29:42 GMT
I tried, as wanted to understand what he thought overall couldn’t make sense, what’s he say in little Britain parlance
|
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Jan 29, 2022 19:04:02 GMT
He gave the foul so he saw it I thought he gave them a throw in? Yes and me but I must admit my eyes were completely full of tears of rage so I may be wrong. |
|
