|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Jan 22, 2022 20:36:26 GMT
7 for me we gave it s good go but Chester again FFS, as for Smith he was shit as well never took a player on and I can't remember him crossing the ball once. 2 appalling goals to concede in the first half but MON can't stand on the pitch and make us put a tackle in. Played our wing backs too deep in the first half and invited Fulham to attack down the flanks. Subs were ok. Gouranga.  |
|
|
|
Post by mowlee on Jan 22, 2022 20:39:32 GMT
6 from me.. good game but we couldn’t win even without their two best players.. Chester.. fuck me.. disaster defender.. what the hell does mom see in him
|
|
|
|
Post by fca47 on Jan 22, 2022 20:47:13 GMT
7 - Could have done with three or four games to bed thses players in before we played Fulham.
|
|
|
|
Post by moon on Jan 22, 2022 20:50:03 GMT
7 from me, although it feels a bit generous. When I compare it to the game against Fulham earlier in the season though and I consider the way they’ve been playing recently I think we put on a good show, disappointing not to take anything from the game of course, but if it wasn’t for mistakes at the back maybe we’d have taken the 3 points.
Some cracking goals from both sides though and a very entertaining game. We have shown we can compete with the best in the league, and this side is so much better than the one MON inherited, the future looks bright, we just need a bit more patience.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2022 20:51:22 GMT
6 from me.. good game but we couldn’t win even without their two best players.. Chester.. fuck me.. disaster defender.. what the hell does mom see in him One of their replacements produced their best moment of the game We're also missing arguably our 2 best players 7 for me. Very disappointed to lose a game v the in form team in he league by a distance |
|
|
|
Post by Staffsoatcake on Jan 22, 2022 21:32:25 GMT
7,would have given 9,but playing Chester makes no sense whatsoever.
|
|
|
|
Post by blackpoolred on Jan 22, 2022 21:49:58 GMT
I am going to give him and the club minus 20 for selling Batth. Should have been Chester that was swapped for Jags, half-decent central defenders are almost impossible to find - as we know.
Not quite a Huthgate - but shocking business and cost us today - WTF are we thinking - looks like we have settled for a 40-year-old and another old crocked player as 2 of our main options for the rest of the season in central defence.
Big fan of our manager, but losing patience - 1 pt from our last 5 home games is also shocking given the way we started the season at home
|
|
|
|
Post by houstonsteve on Jan 22, 2022 21:56:03 GMT
6 Chester and Clucas started which gives the team a mountain to climb. Chester responsible for 2 goals.
Subs were wrong subs as well. we needed a bigger foothold in midfield and for me Vrancic needed to come on.
fair dos for introducing the young uns and Baker looks great so far.
hes got the squad now so over to you MON.
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtygary69 on Jan 22, 2022 22:00:06 GMT
6 Chester and Clucas started which gives the team a mountain to climb. Chester responsible for 2 goals. Subs were wrong subs as well. we needed a bigger foothold in midfield and for me Vrancic needed to come on. fair dos for introducing the young uns and Baker looks great so far. hes got the squad now so over to you MON. 6? Are you mental? It was either Chester or Fox and I think both would have struggled regardless. It’s just the knowing how bad Chester will be before a ball is kicked that makes it a bit depressing. We struggled for legs (as usual) with Clucas and Allen in there and Vrancic won’t have helped that all. I can see why he didn’t get on. It was a game that was a good physical battle with them having lots of tempo and pace. I think with what we had to choose from, there wasn’t a great deal more he could do other than maybe get JPB on a little earlier. 8/10. Should have had a point from that. |
|
|
|
Post by thicknthin on Jan 22, 2022 22:00:12 GMT
I am going to give him and the club minus 20 for selling Batth. Should have been Chester that was swapped for Jags, half-decent central defenders are almost impossible to find - as we know. Not quite a Huthgate - but shocking business and cost us today - WTF are we thinking - looks like we have settled for a 40-year-old and another old crocked player as 2 of our main options for the rest of the season in central defence. Big fan of our manager, but losing patience - 1 pt from our last 5 home games is also shocking given the way we started the season at home You can only sell if someone else wants to buy. I guess that’s the hand Micheal was dealt. Send Chester to the glue factory and pay him or get rid of the competent Batth because someone else will pay him? |
|
|
|
Post by houstonsteve on Jan 22, 2022 22:02:36 GMT
6 Chester and Clucas started which gives the team a mountain to climb. Chester responsible for 2 goals. Subs were wrong subs as well. we needed a bigger foothold in midfield and for me Vrancic needed to come on. fair dos for introducing the young uns and Baker looks great so far. hes got the squad now so over to you MON. 6? Are you mental? It was either Chester or Fox and I think both would have struggled regardless. It’s just the knowing how bad Chester will be before a ball is kicked that makes it a bit depressing. We struggled for legs (as usual) with Clucas and Allen in there and Vrancic won’t have helped that all. I can see why he didn’t get on. It was a game that was a good physical battle with them having lots of tempo and pace. I think with what we had to choose from, there wasn’t a great deal more he could do other than maybe get JPB on a little earlier. 8/10. Should have had a point from that. no need for the insults son. but on you go with your opinion. have a lovely evening. |
|
|
|
Post by dirtygary69 on Jan 22, 2022 22:05:44 GMT
6? Are you mental? It was either Chester or Fox and I think both would have struggled regardless. It’s just the knowing how bad Chester will be before a ball is kicked that makes it a bit depressing. We struggled for legs (as usual) with Clucas and Allen in there and Vrancic won’t have helped that all. I can see why he didn’t get on. It was a game that was a good physical battle with them having lots of tempo and pace. I think with what we had to choose from, there wasn’t a great deal more he could do other than maybe get JPB on a little earlier. 8/10. Should have had a point from that. no need for the insults son. but on you go with your opinion. have a lovely evening. Hardly an insult, but sorry. You too. |
|
|
|
Post by Sfance on Jan 22, 2022 22:56:34 GMT
It is mystifying that he continues to pick Chester. What point is he trying to prove? 5 for obstinacy in the face of what everyone else can see. Bring on Holden.
|
|
|
|
Post by chiswickpotter on Jan 23, 2022 10:29:18 GMT
6 for me and that despite good substitutions. Picking Chester makes no sense. Fox is not great but more mobile. However my big issue was him picking Clucas as a number 10. Tactically shape made sense but surely Ince or Vrancic should have played
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 24, 2022 0:03:15 GMT
Why did he leave the subs so late?
|
|
|
|
Post by tejstokie on Jan 24, 2022 5:05:40 GMT
Why did he leave the subs so late? Always does? Never makes any sense given the flow of the matches either. |
|
|
|
Post by thestokielad on Jan 24, 2022 16:06:26 GMT
6.5
|
|
