|
Post by marylandstoke on Feb 3, 2020 17:06:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Feb 3, 2020 18:32:41 GMT
Literally an article which states there were never any plans for a cheese room
|
|
|
Post by marylandstoke on Feb 4, 2020 4:19:21 GMT
Literally an article which states there were never any plans for a cheese room Which our Tottingham friend has still not worked out. Comedy eh..? It’s not for everyone. Oh, and they have a pod cast from their fans, cheese room spurs. Couldn’t make it up.
|
|
|
Post by ct1 on Feb 4, 2020 16:53:26 GMT
Fact checker? FACT No.1 - There is no cheese room at the Spurs new ground. FACT No.2 - There never was a cheese room planned at Spurs ground. Wind your neck in. I can take it or leave it if you want to take the piss out of Spurs, I have have plenty of Arsenal and Chelsea mates who do that; but none of them go on about a 'cheese room' because it never existed. Im sorry mate, What a truly bizarre thing to argue about. I'm quite gutted now that their isn't a cheese room at your stadium. Do they sell cheese sandwiches?
|
|
|
Post by leicspotter on Feb 4, 2020 19:53:53 GMT
Literally an article which states there were never any plans for a cheese room Which our Tottingham friend has still not worked out. Comedy eh..? It’s not for everyone. Oh, and they have a pod cast from their fans, cheese room spurs. Couldn’t make it up. They are still checking this at Stockley Park
|
|
|
Post by Billy the kid on Feb 4, 2020 20:13:15 GMT
Which our Tottingham friend has still not worked out. Comedy eh..? It’s not for everyone. Oh, and they have a pod cast from their fans, cheese room spurs. Couldn’t make it up. They are still checking this at Stockley Park VAR: No cheese room.
|
|
|
Post by ct1 on Feb 4, 2020 20:47:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by ct1 on Feb 4, 2020 21:28:03 GMT
Shrewsbury goal disallowed!
|
|
|
Post by lancashirelad on Feb 4, 2020 22:14:45 GMT
Guess which team gets the benefit of VAR again. LiVARpool U23.
The clip on bbc website just happens to jump when the millisecond the decision is made that shrewsbury player is offside yet the Liverpool right back looks suspiciously like he is playing him on side when the original shot is taken but in is a wide position.
Credit also to the Shrews for scoring a great og to make sure Danny Murphys happy that the world wants Liverpool to play Chelsea in the next round.
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Feb 14, 2020 20:48:44 GMT
Thank fuck we’re not in the premier league with decisions like the one in the match tonight😡
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2020 20:56:57 GMT
Thank fuck we’re not in the premier league with decisions like the one in the match tonight😡 It's the correct decision by the rules of the game. It's not VAR at fault, it's the rules
|
|
|
Post by ChesterStokie on Feb 14, 2020 20:57:58 GMT
Thank fuck we’re not in the premier league with decisions like the one in the match tonight😡 Even by VAR’s standards that was a shocker. There cannot be a single person in that stadium who thought there was even a hint of offside in that goal.
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Feb 14, 2020 20:58:10 GMT
Thank fuck we’re not in the premier league with decisions like the one in the match tonight😡 It's the correct decision by the rules of the game. It's not VAR at fault, it's the rules The law is wrong then mate like they’re discussing now
|
|
|
Post by greenman on Feb 14, 2020 20:58:46 GMT
have the rules changed, the ball was played backwards. Stan Matthews would be rendered useless by these clowns
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Feb 14, 2020 20:59:00 GMT
Thank fuck we’re not in the premier league with decisions like the one in the match tonight😡 Even by VAR’s standards that was a shocker. There cannot be a single person in that stadium who thought there was even a hint of offside in that goal. Like the Wolves fans chanted “it’s not football anymore”
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Feb 14, 2020 21:00:24 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2020 21:00:42 GMT
It's the correct decision by the rules of the game. It's not VAR at fault, it's the rules The law is wrong then mate like they’re discussing now Technically he came back from an offside position and if that happened anywhere else on the pitch it would still have been offside. I'd like to see the rule changed so you can't be offside from a corner in those situations
|
|
|
Post by Seymour Beaver on Feb 14, 2020 21:54:20 GMT
It's the correct decision by the rules of the game. It's not VAR at fault, it's the rules The law is wrong then mate like they’re discussing now And that's what VAR is showing up. Even though that is the law and has been forever - it would never have been given by the naked eye. Personally I never wanted VAR but it's here to stay. I just wish those who had wanted it for years (yes you Alan Green) who were saying things like "it doesn't matter how long it takes, as long as it's the right decision in the end" or "there's too much money at stake to be getting decisions wrong" or "the technology is there so let's use it" would stop whining and either admit that were wrong or just shut the fuck up.
|
|
|
Post by Kewstokie on Feb 14, 2020 22:17:17 GMT
The crowd and officials see the 'incident' in real time and from one angle. The first change to VAR should be that the analyst (s) only get to replay the incident once only, at normal speed, without the aid of graphics. Slo-mo and reviews from numerous angles distort one's perception and judgement. The analyst should have no more an 'advantage' than those present or the officials. Only if there's then a clear and obvious mistake should the incident be referred back to the 4th official to have a look, in real time again.
If that doesn't work then scrap the whole thing.
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Feb 14, 2020 22:29:19 GMT
You should only ever be able to be offside from a pass towards the opposition goal, and tbh I always thought that was a rule anyway. Learn something new every day.
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 14, 2020 22:38:54 GMT
I just presumed you’d be offside if you’re ahead of the ball but the ball goes backwards? I don’t see the issue here other than people don’t know the rules? I include myself in that as I was just presuming.
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Feb 14, 2020 22:45:51 GMT
Hang on what?? You can be offside from a pass that goes backwards? Haven’t seen this incident
|
|
|
Post by ChesterStokie on Feb 14, 2020 22:46:25 GMT
You should only ever be able to be offside from a pass towards the opposition goal, and tbh I always thought that was a rule anyway. Learn something new every day. Agreed. I’ve been watching football for 50 years and I didn’t know you could be offside when the ball is passed backwards!!!
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Feb 14, 2020 22:49:57 GMT
Hang on what?? You can be offside from a pass that goes backwards? Haven’t seen this incident He was ahead of the ball. So I think it’s presumed with the whole backwards thing that the person receiving it will have started behind the ball so it’s impossible to be off. Certainly a strange one but imo makes sense. It’s such a unique situation.
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Feb 14, 2020 22:55:04 GMT
Hang on what?? You can be offside from a pass that goes backwards? Haven’t seen this incident He was ahead of the ball. So I think it’s presumed with the whole backwards thing that the person receiving it will have started behind the ball so it’s impossible to be off. Certainly a strange one but imo makes sense. It’s such a unique situation. Christ. Yeah I’ve just reread the rule and that is correct. I’m usually pretty good with the details of the rules but that’s a new one on me
|
|
diego
Spectator
Posts: 35
|
Post by diego on Feb 14, 2020 23:11:32 GMT
it wasn't called offside when the corner was played backwards. the corner taker (just) was offside when it was played back to him.
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Feb 14, 2020 23:16:32 GMT
it wasn't called offside when the corner was played backwards. the corner taker (just) was offside when it was played back to him. Yes we know, the majority of corners are played backwards, if they went forwards they'd go out of play for a goal kick.
|
|
|
Post by Praetorian on Feb 15, 2020 0:25:46 GMT
The crowd and officials see the 'incident' in real time and from one angle. The first change to VAR should be that the analyst (s) only get to replay the incident once only, at normal speed, without the aid of graphics. Slo-mo and reviews from numerous angles distort one's perception and judgement. The analyst should have no more an 'advantage' than those present or the officials. Only if there's then a clear and obvious mistake should the incident be referred back to the 4th official to have a look, in real time again. If that doesn't work then scrap the whole thing. Sorry but that’s retarded mate, what’s the point in VAR at all if they can’t look at events in greater detail 😂 It should be looked at from various angles and if it’s a very close decision then advantage given to the attacker
|
|
|
Post by skemstokie on Feb 15, 2020 12:38:24 GMT
The crowd and officials see the 'incident' in real time and from one angle. The first change to VAR should be that the analyst (s) only get to replay the incident once only, at normal speed, without the aid of graphics. Slo-mo and reviews from numerous angles distort one's perception and judgement. The analyst should have no more an 'advantage' than those present or the officials. Only if there's then a clear and obvious mistake should the incident be referred back to the 4th official to have a look, in real time again. If that doesn't work then scrap the whole thing. Still think easiest option in marginal decisions is did the player gain any advantage and if not goal stands.
|
|
|
Post by liam007 on Feb 23, 2020 8:29:55 GMT
Just watching MOTD,Burnley V Bournemouth VAR decisions just awful.The rules 100% need to change after this season or football is going to kill itself.Obviously Liverpool are going to be Champions for the 1st time in a long time but this season is going to be remembered as the season VAR ruined football.
|
|