|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 19, 2020 17:17:42 GMT
Could/should be 3/4 nil
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:18:18 GMT
via mobile
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 19, 2020 17:18:18 GMT
I just want to watch a football match between 2 top teams and they make the correct decisions which on that goal they didn’t 2 top teams? 1 top team and a really average team. 😂👍 Fair point
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:18:43 GMT
Post by Pugsley on Jan 19, 2020 17:18:43 GMT
I prefer them to Liverpool by a massive margin but that’s just shite goalkeeping. I just want to watch a football match between 2 top teams and they make the correct decisions which on that goal they didn’t Clearly did, the on pitch referee hadn't got a clue. It took someone else who isn't influenced by the crowd or Henderson in their ear to make an easy decision.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:20:08 GMT
via mobile
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 19, 2020 17:20:08 GMT
I just want to watch a football match between 2 top teams and they make the correct decisions which on that goal they didn’t Clearly did, the on pitch referee hadn't got a clue. It took someone else who isn't influenced by the crowd or Henderson in their ear to make an easy decision. Lets see what the panel of experts make of it
|
|
|
Post by Clem Fandango on Jan 19, 2020 17:20:18 GMT
It’s weak goalkeeping from a keeper renowned for flapping. Nothing contrary. It just isn’t a foul. It was an accident but it was dangerous play irrespective. That’s a booking. It is weak goalkeeping and it's a clear foul. I dont see how mate. Anywhere else on the pitch and it wouldn't be given. apparently the reason given was he doesn't make an attempt to play the ball. i dont see how thats the case?
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:21:07 GMT
Post by cobhamstokey on Jan 19, 2020 17:21:07 GMT
Liverpool dominating Man U. Soft foul but they get given 9 times out of 10.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:21:57 GMT
Post by Pugsley on Jan 19, 2020 17:21:57 GMT
Clearly did, the on pitch referee hadn't got a clue. It took someone else who isn't influenced by the crowd or Henderson in their ear to make an easy decision. Lets see what the panel of experts make of it Lol, hard men Keano and Souness? Whatever.
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Jan 19, 2020 17:22:28 GMT
He's absolutely TERRIFIED of giving a decision against Liverpool. Neville making a prick of himself, clear foul on the keeper No foul. Var took so long so they could think up a reason not to give it.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:22:53 GMT
Post by Pugsley on Jan 19, 2020 17:22:53 GMT
It is weak goalkeeping and it's a clear foul. I dont see how mate. Anywhere else on the pitch and it wouldn't be given. apparently the reason given was he doesn't make an attempt to play the ball. i dont see how thats the case? Obviously, he's a keeper!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 19, 2020 17:25:12 GMT
Lets see what the panel of experts make of it Lol, hard men Keano and Souness? Whatever. Yes and both spot on
|
|
|
Post by Clem Fandango on Jan 19, 2020 17:26:34 GMT
I dont see how mate. Anywhere else on the pitch and it wouldn't be given. apparently the reason given was he doesn't make an attempt to play the ball. i dont see how thats the case? Obviously, he's a keeper!!!!! Thats the point though isn't it. as souness has just said. if you cant touch a keeper its a foul. however that isn't the rule. the ball is there to be won.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:28:04 GMT
Post by Pugsley on Jan 19, 2020 17:28:04 GMT
Lol, hard men Keano and Souness? Whatever. Yes and both spot on Apparently it's OK to jump for a ball that you have no chance in getting and knock the keeper over. You'll be on next telling me Ryan didn't break Ramsay's leg.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:29:47 GMT
via mobile
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 19, 2020 17:29:47 GMT
Apparently it's OK to jump for a ball that you have no chance in getting and knock the keeper over. You'll be on next telling me Ryan didn't break Ramsay's leg. Have you and Bayern swapped accounts today🤔Never ever a foul
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:31:40 GMT
Post by Pugsley on Jan 19, 2020 17:31:40 GMT
The facts are Liverpool players didn't even complain.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:32:20 GMT
via mobile
Post by tomcmod on Jan 19, 2020 17:32:20 GMT
I understand it is soft goalkeeping but how can Van Dijk jumping into him and not winning the ball not be a foul? He hasn't won the ball but gone into the man. If he wins it then it's not a foul but doesn't and isn't close to doing so.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:33:12 GMT
via mobile
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 19, 2020 17:33:12 GMT
The facts are Liverpool players didn't even complain. Even the biggest Utd fan in Neville said it was a goal,that for me says it all
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Jan 19, 2020 17:33:15 GMT
I never had you down Pugs as a closet Manc🤔 I'm not, I hate LiVARpool!!!!!!!! But they’ve been done twice by it today
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:33:26 GMT
via mobile
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 19, 2020 17:33:26 GMT
I understand it is soft goalkeeping but how can Van Dijk jumping into him and not winning the ball not be a foul? He hasn't won the ball but gone into the man. If he wins it then it's not a foul but doesn't and isn't close to doing so. Because it’s a contact sport.
|
|
|
Post by numpty40 on Jan 19, 2020 17:33:48 GMT
Obviously, he's a keeper!!!!! Thats the point though isn't it. as souness has just said. if you cant touch a keeper its a foul. however that isn't the rule. the ball is there to be won. Van Dijk jumped into the keeper for a ball he had no chance of winning. It should have been the easiest decision a referee has to make, Pawson fucked up and VAR has confirmed that.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:35:27 GMT
via mobile
Post by tomcmod on Jan 19, 2020 17:35:27 GMT
I understand it is soft goalkeeping but how can Van Dijk jumping into him and not winning the ball not be a foul? He hasn't won the ball but gone into the man. If he wins it then it's not a foul but doesn't and isn't close to doing so. Because it’s a contact sport. Really? That is your argument? So why do we have fouls then? 🤦♂️
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:37:12 GMT
Post by spitthedog on Jan 19, 2020 17:37:12 GMT
Like this Van Dijk's goal should've been disallowed due to him having Virgil on the back of his shirt. Really bugs me that certain players have their first names on their shirt. You wouldn't get someone with Dave on their shirt. And don't get me started on Chicarito. Lee, Preston
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 19, 2020 17:37:54 GMT
Because it’s a contact sport. Really? That is your argument? So why do we have fouls then? 🤦♂️ Yes. You can have contact but it not be a foul. Quite simple really.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:39:08 GMT
Post by Pugsley on Jan 19, 2020 17:39:08 GMT
I understand it is soft goalkeeping but how can Van Dijk jumping into him and not winning the ball not be a foul? He hasn't won the ball but gone into the man. If he wins it then it's not a foul but doesn't and isn't close to doing so. Because it’s a contact sport. Yeah, he made contact and didn't win the ball (he could never have won it anyway) i.e. foul. It really is that simple.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:41:20 GMT
via mobile
Post by tomcmod on Jan 19, 2020 17:41:20 GMT
Really? That is your argument? So why do we have fouls then? 🤦♂️ Yes. You can have contact but it not be a foul. Quite simple really. Yes but going for a ball you won't win, didn't win and only hit the player isn't just "a contact sport" it is a foul! If he makes any contact with the ball, it is no foul but he doesn't so it is. Simple!
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 17:43:03 GMT
via mobile
Post by chad on Jan 19, 2020 17:43:03 GMT
How on earth are Liverpool not 5 0 up !
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 18:23:24 GMT
via mobile
Post by bayernoatcake on Jan 19, 2020 18:23:24 GMT
Yes. You can have contact but it not be a foul. Quite simple really. Yes but going for a ball you won't win, didn't win and only hit the player isn't just "a contact sport" it is a foul! If he makes any contact with the ball, it is no foul but he doesn't so it is. Simple! He could have won it.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 18:31:03 GMT
Post by Pugsley on Jan 19, 2020 18:31:03 GMT
Yes but going for a ball you won't win, didn't win and only hit the player isn't just "a contact sport" it is a foul! If he makes any contact with the ball, it is no foul but he doesn't so it is. Simple! He could have won it. Lol, if he was 8 foot 6 maybe. Fair play, Pawson had a more consistent 2nd half. Clearly someone had a word with him.
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Jan 19, 2020 18:31:06 GMT
I love it when Stoke fans prattle on about not being a foul etc. If we have one of those go against us on Monday peoples heads will fall off in rage. It's not that one decision, it's been all through the game. He's booked Matic for nothing while Henderson and Ox have gotten away with clear yellows. I never had you down Pugs as a closet Manc🤔 Now that you mention it, the only time Pugs hasn't spent his every waking minute slagging off all things Stoke City was when we had Mark Hughes as manager... You know, ex-Manchester United player & Old Trafford hero Mark Hughes. Interesting.
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 18:35:14 GMT
Post by Pugsley on Jan 19, 2020 18:35:14 GMT
I never had you down Pugs as a closet Manc🤔 Now that you mention it, the only time Pugs hasn't spent his every waking minute slagging off all things Stoke City was when we had Mark Hughes as manager... You know, ex-Manchester United player & Old Trafford hero Mark Hughes. Interesting. I fucking loved Darren Fletcher....
|
|
|
Pawson
Jan 19, 2020 19:26:39 GMT
via mobile
Post by scfcwebby on Jan 19, 2020 19:26:39 GMT
He's absolutely TERRIFIED of giving a decision against Liverpool. Neville making a prick of himself, clear foul on the keeper Only one person making a prick of himself and it isn't Neville 😉 That was a disgraceful VAR decision, never in a million years was that a foul on the keeper. The game is fucked
|
|