|
Post by rorystowel on Oct 19, 2019 17:32:39 GMT
9*
Got everything right today, that’s 2 games running! Still feel like I’m dreaming...
Subs were a little late maybe, but bringing on Hogan for Campbell resulted in a goal so fair play to him.
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Oct 19, 2019 17:35:26 GMT
11. He gets an extra point for pissing off people who hate he was happy we won.
|
|
|
Post by liathroid on Oct 19, 2019 17:39:48 GMT
No he wasn't he was showing his appreciation and thumping his chest and it looked like there was some relief in there as well. It's what happens when you are bi-polar! H It was nauseating. your a miserable cunt Bayern ,enjoy the win
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Oct 19, 2019 17:41:13 GMT
9. He got a lot of things right. Like Mattador above I can't see the logic in the way Campbell was subbed off. Why not take him off when he was down injured and Hogan was ready to come on? Making the sub a couple of minutes later meant that we had to play a few seconds with 10 men whilst Canpbell was waiting permission to go back on after his injury. Jones would have looked daft if Fulham had scored when we were down to 10 men. But, that apart. Jones had a good day at the office. Keep it up and we'll soon be in mid table. Thought it was more of a time wasting ploy tbh letting him back on and then bringing him off took another minute off the clock, which should, but more often than not doesn't add any time on at the end. Most of the 5 minutes were Arter imo I don't mind a bit of time wasting - but not if we only have a 1 goal lead, are under pressure and it means being down to 10 men for a while. As I said earlier, Jones would have looked foolish if we had conceded whilst Campbell was waiting to get back on the pitch. In any case Campbell, injured or not, was knackered and bringing on Hogan was the right thing to do. I doubt Campbell would have won the penalty Hogan won if he, not Hogan, had been on the pitch. Jones isn't alone in this but too many managers seem to me to be scared of making subs when they are needed. The Lindsay and Vokes subs late on I could understand but the Hogan one could and should have been done earlier.
|
|
|
Post by serpico on Oct 19, 2019 17:43:51 GMT
His post match antics were OTT but understandable given the circumstances.
|
|
|
Post by clarkeda on Oct 19, 2019 17:58:51 GMT
No he wasn't he was showing his appreciation and thumping his chest and it looked like there was some relief in there as well. It's what happens when you are bi-polar! H It was nauseating. Prefer that to the complete prick that was rowett.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2019 18:04:09 GMT
4, it was a solid 8 until after the final whistle. You mean that the 3 points mean nothing because he isn’t very good at press conferences and as such, he deserves a less than average score?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2019 18:07:17 GMT
Thought it was more of a time wasting ploy tbh letting him back on and then bringing him off took another minute off the clock, which should, but more often than not doesn't add any time on at the end. Most of the 5 minutes were Arter imo I don't mind a bit of time wasting - but not if we only have a 1 goal lead, are under pressure and it means being down to 10 men for a while. As I said earlier, Jones would have looked foolish if we had conceded whilst Campbell was waiting to get back on the pitch. In any case Campbell, injured or not, was knackered and bringing on Hogan was the right thing to do. I doubt Campbell would have won the penalty Hogan won if he, not Hogan, had been on the pitch. Jones isn't alone in this but too many managers seem to me to be scared of making subs when they are needed. The Lindsay and Vokes subs late on I could understand but the Hogan one could and should have been done earlier. Isn’t that the exact situation to waste time though? You don’t waste time when you are 7-0 up and on a rampage do you, it’s purely there to take the sting out of the team and take a breather. Campbell doesn’t do too much defensively so 5 seconds on the sideline wasn’t going to be an issue.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2019 18:10:24 GMT
It was horrible. He’s just won his second game all season and he’s acting like he’s won the World Cup. I don’t like that sort of thing anyway nevermind when you’re lucky to still be in a job. No humility at all. No he wasn't he was showing his appreciation and thumping his chest and it looked like there was some relief in there as well. It's what happens when you are bi-polar! H Oh I do hate people using medical terms to describe a strange behaviour without any thought at how constantly associating the one (a condition) with the latter (a negative response) only adds to the massive stigma that is mental health.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2019 18:12:36 GMT
4, it was a solid 8 until after the final whistle. What an attention seeking idiot you are.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2019 18:15:14 GMT
9* should have taken Campbell off earlier, but apart from that, spot on.
And for, the fact he’s over the top at the end is quite refreshing. It shows he cares, and the players can see it too.
|
|
|
Post by heworksardtho on Oct 19, 2019 18:24:51 GMT
10 Always new NJ would come good🤫
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Oct 19, 2019 18:28:11 GMT
9. Dilly rallied over subs when it was obvious Campbell was fucked.
|
|
|
Post by worcesterstokie on Oct 19, 2019 18:28:26 GMT
7* Campbell should have been subbed far earlier. Against a team happy to pass across the pitch all day we were far too deep in the second half. Substitution process still baffling! .... and what does he say at half time that means we play every second half far worst than we finish the first!!!
|
|
|
Post by jeycov on Oct 19, 2019 18:40:53 GMT
Ditched the Barbour jacket for a tracksuit 🤔
9* Maybe Hogan for Campbell a bit earlier
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Oct 19, 2019 18:41:19 GMT
Prefer that to the complete prick that was rowett. Both are twats. It was just so unnecessary.
|
|
|
Post by zerps on Oct 19, 2019 18:42:59 GMT
You joyless twat! H It was horrible. He’s just won his second game all season and he’s acting like he’s won the World Cup. I don’t like that sort of thing anyway nevermind when you’re lucky to still be in a job. No humility at all. Go home then
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Oct 19, 2019 18:43:32 GMT
I don't mind a bit of time wasting - but not if we only have a 1 goal lead, are under pressure and it means being down to 10 men for a while. As I said earlier, Jones would have looked foolish if we had conceded whilst Campbell was waiting to get back on the pitch. In any case Campbell, injured or not, was knackered and bringing on Hogan was the right thing to do. I doubt Campbell would have won the penalty Hogan won if he, not Hogan, had been on the pitch. Jones isn't alone in this but too many managers seem to me to be scared of making subs when they are needed. The Lindsay and Vokes subs late on I could understand but the Hogan one could and should have been done earlier. Isn’t that the exact situation to waste time though? You don’t waste time when you are 7-0 up and on a rampage do you, it’s purely there to take the sting out of the team and take a breather. Campbell doesn’t do too much defensively so 5 seconds on the sideline wasn’t going to be an issue. Plenty of others on the thread seem to agree with me - namely that Campbell needed to be subbed - and in that context, he should have been subbed when he went down "injured" - not a few minutes later.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 19, 2019 18:53:09 GMT
10. Faultless. Keep it up NJ
|
|
|
Post by RedandWhite90 on Oct 19, 2019 18:58:52 GMT
9*
Just needed to tweak that first sub a little earlier. We all know now the Tyrese is fucked after 60, so maybe he wanted him to stay on to build some match fitness but we lost our press for around 10 mins.
Overall, excellent. Plenty of chances, midfield starting to purr and individual player errors being eradicated.
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Oct 19, 2019 18:59:37 GMT
Thought it was more of a time wasting ploy tbh letting him back on and then bringing him off took another minute off the clock, which should, but more often than not doesn't add any time on at the end. Most of the 5 minutes were Arter imo I don't mind a bit of time wasting - but not if we only have a 1 goal lead, are under pressure and it means being down to 10 men for a while. As I said earlier, Jones would have looked foolish if we had conceded whilst Campbell was waiting to get back on the pitch. In any case Campbell, injured or not, was knackered and bringing on Hogan was the right thing to do. I doubt Campbell would have won the penalty Hogan won if he, not Hogan, had been on the pitch. Jones isn't alone in this but too many managers seem to me to be scared of making subs when they are needed. The Lindsay and Vokes subs late on I could understand but the Hogan one could and should have been done earlier. “Time wasting” is just that, a waste of time because the 4th official adds it to the additional time at the end.
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Oct 19, 2019 19:11:01 GMT
I don't mind a bit of time wasting - but not if we only have a 1 goal lead, are under pressure and it means being down to 10 men for a while. As I said earlier, Jones would have looked foolish if we had conceded whilst Campbell was waiting to get back on the pitch. In any case Campbell, injured or not, was knackered and bringing on Hogan was the right thing to do. I doubt Campbell would have won the penalty Hogan won if he, not Hogan, had been on the pitch. Jones isn't alone in this but too many managers seem to me to be scared of making subs when they are needed. The Lindsay and Vokes subs late on I could understand but the Hogan one could and should have been done earlier. “Time wasting” is just that, a waste of time because the 4th official adds it to the additional time at the end. No he dunner. Nowhere near.
|
|
|
Post by loosestools on Oct 19, 2019 19:35:58 GMT
Can't fault a good result like that! Have you been converted - like Paul on the road to Damascus? For me the jury is still out, although I have taken off the Black Cap, but it is still at my right hand.
|
|
|
Post by miltonstokienew on Oct 19, 2019 19:37:14 GMT
4, it was a solid 8 until after the final whistle. Did you want us to win to today ?
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Oct 19, 2019 19:41:37 GMT
4, it was a solid 8 until after the final whistle. Did you want us to win to today ? Yes. He’s not going to sacked is he? So hope is lost on that front.
|
|
|
Post by staffordpotter78 on Oct 19, 2019 19:41:50 GMT
*8 Got tactics spot on, players clearly playing for him, but some of the players were struggling from 60 minutes onwards and were getting a bit leggy but he didn't seem to want to use any subs.
All in all got it almost spot on today, but needs to be more proactive with his substitutions as on another day that could have bitten us hard on the backside
|
|
|
Post by dreamtheater on Oct 19, 2019 19:44:15 GMT
8/10 because, he picked pretty much the right team and crucially kept McClean and the one trick show pony out of it. However, unlike the Swansea game where Stoke City bossed it, for long periods Stoke were outclassed by Fulham who looked far more like a premier league side than we ever could nowadays.
|
|
|
Post by chigstoke on Oct 19, 2019 19:44:59 GMT
9* for me
An excellent display worthy of its plaudits.
|
|
|
Post by Beloved Monkfish on Oct 19, 2019 19:54:43 GMT
Prefer that to the complete prick that was rowett. Both are twats. It was just so unnecessary. Takes one to know one.
|
|
|
Post by AlbertTatlock on Oct 19, 2019 19:54:43 GMT
8.5 a long awaited home win against a good side and a clean sheet to boot. Gouranga.
|
|