|
|
Post by cityboy on Jul 27, 2019 17:43:15 GMT
Only Stokes Media could make there fans log on to Leicester TV to watch a home game, Shambles. Pleased with performance (Need a penalty taker big time) Final Third needs a new high profile face. If that happens, can only see good this season.
|
|
|
|
Post by robwahlmann on Jul 27, 2019 17:46:16 GMT
Leicester are a decent team, in fact I'd say it's a top 8 team in the PL. We matched them quite well today and a draw wouldn't have been a wrong result overall. We were a bit better in the first half than in the second though in my opinion.  |
|
|
|
Post by kelw on Jul 28, 2019 7:07:51 GMT
And the opposition of about 7.other Prem clubs. Actually Leicester insist like many that they can show games _ asked one of our esteemed colleagues today and they were originally showing Rotherham but as were bringing the first squad terms were they that get to show the game. Makes sense to me
So only at Stoke and about 18 other teams so far.
|
|
|
|
Post by melbournestokie21 on Jul 28, 2019 7:46:04 GMT
The worst part for the club is that leiceisters stream was crystal clear and faultless. Didnt buffer once and provided exceptional coverage in terms of replays and camera angles etc.
They dont even have to have that kind of quality to stream because the premier league does it all for them.
If stokes next week isnt at least as good as yesterdays its an absolute shambles. Let alone considering we have to pay for stokes games when last nights was free
|
|
|
|
Post by kelw on Jul 28, 2019 8:50:45 GMT
The worst part for the club is that leiceisters stream was crystal clear and faultless. Didnt buffer once and provided exceptional coverage in terms of replays and camera angles etc. They dont even have to have that kind of quality to stream because the premier league does it all for them. If stokes next week isnt at least as good as yesterdays its an absolute shambles. Let alone considering we have to pay for stokes games when last nights was free We don't have our own TV Channel though. Leicester were Prem Champions and we have to accept that whilst not one of the big clubs they have over achieved and moved up in the football world. Reading v Chelsea on Chelsea TV today no different. |
|
|
|
Post by mamasgloves on Jul 28, 2019 9:01:28 GMT
The worst part for the club is that leiceisters stream was crystal clear and faultless. Didnt buffer once and provided exceptional coverage in terms of replays and camera angles etc. They dont even have to have that kind of quality to stream because the premier league does it all for them. If stokes next week isnt at least as good as yesterdays its an absolute shambles. Let alone considering we have to pay for stokes games when last nights was free We don't have our own TV Channel though. Leicester were Prem Champions and we have to accept that whilst not one of the big clubs they have over achieved and moved up in the football world. Reading v Chelsea on Chelsea TV today no different. You way you keep defending the club's ineptitude has me convinced you work for them. There is no excuse not to be better in any of our operations, Tranmere had their own dedicated radio station, pretty sure they didn't win the league they just had a bit of foresight and desire to improve their media output. It's that simple. All but one of our opponents have covered our games one way or the other, it's embarrassing. |
|
|
|
Post by stokesaint1 on Jul 28, 2019 13:31:29 GMT
I wanted to see Saints (Rugby League cup semi final) yesterday, so didn't go to the game and had to watch on Leicester City TV. Only one word to describe it. WOW. It was a real pleasure of an experience from easy quick free log in, to superb quality of broadcast with excellent commentary. An absolute pleasure. Many thanks Leicester City. This was like comparing the Premier league and the North West Counties league. Stoke City please watch and learn.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2019 13:37:39 GMT
The worst part for the club is that leiceisters stream was crystal clear and faultless. Didnt buffer once and provided exceptional coverage in terms of replays and camera angles etc. They dont even have to have that kind of quality to stream because the premier league does it all for them. If stokes next week isnt at least as good as yesterdays its an absolute shambles. Let alone considering we have to pay for stokes games when last nights was free We don't have our own TV Channel though. Leicester were Prem Champions and we have to accept that whilst not one of the big clubs they have over achieved and moved up in the football world. Reading v Chelsea on Chelsea TV today no different. Is it an actual TV channel? I thought it was a website that they set up to stream games? |
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Jul 28, 2019 14:19:57 GMT
The worst part for the club is that leiceisters stream was crystal clear and faultless. Didnt buffer once and provided exceptional coverage in terms of replays and camera angles etc. They dont even have to have that kind of quality to stream because the premier league does it all for them. If stokes next week isnt at least as good as yesterdays its an absolute shambles. Let alone considering we have to pay for stokes games when last nights was free They are shitting money in the premier league and have a reasonable global fan base due to Thai ownership and winning the premier league. In the real world it would be an utter waste of money for Stoke to do the same. |
|
|
|
Post by stokie23 on Jul 28, 2019 21:01:47 GMT
We don't have our own TV Channel though. Leicester were Prem Champions and we have to accept that whilst not one of the big clubs they have over achieved and moved up in the football world. Reading v Chelsea on Chelsea TV today no different. Is it an actual TV channel? I thought it was a website that they set up to stream games? Yea not sure it’s a TV channel in the same way MUTV or Chelsea TV is. Just an online service done to much better, more professional standard |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 28, 2019 21:11:10 GMT
I think everyone here is missing something. Leicester wouldn't have brought their own kit over to our stadium to stream the match surely? It must have been done with our setup and so if it isn't of that quality for home games then we've got a problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by nott1 on Jul 29, 2019 11:42:30 GMT
The worst part for the club is that leiceisters stream was crystal clear and faultless. Didnt buffer once and provided exceptional coverage in terms of replays and camera angles etc. They dont even have to have that kind of quality to stream because the premier league does it all for them. If stokes next week isnt at least as good as yesterdays its an absolute shambles. Let alone considering we have to pay for stokes games when last nights was free They are shitting money in the premier league and have a reasonable global fan base due to Thai ownership and winning the premier league. In the real world it would be an utter waste of money for Stoke to do the same. We are owned by are massively profitable worldwide company, with billionaire directors, and can compete with almost any of them! |
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Jul 29, 2019 16:09:16 GMT
They are shitting money in the premier league and have a reasonable global fan base due to Thai ownership and winning the premier league. In the real world it would be an utter waste of money for Stoke to do the same. We are owned by are massively profitable worldwide company, with billionaire directors, and can compete with almost any of them! Who don't like wasting money and who are constrained by FFP. |
|
|
|
Post by stokefan1972 on Jul 29, 2019 16:31:59 GMT
We are owned by are massively profitable worldwide company, with billionaire directors, and can compete with almost any of them! Who don't like wasting money and who are constrained by FFP. a All it would take is £200 million bunged into the naming rights for the stadium |
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Jul 29, 2019 16:44:46 GMT
We are owned by are massively profitable worldwide company, with billionaire directors, and can compete with almost any of them! Who don't like wasting money and who are constrained by FFP. I can think of £30m wasted on players, just last season. The SCFC limited company should sell the ground to another bet365 company, which would use and develop the facility for numerous sports, concerts, conferences, cinema, catering, retail outlet, etc. while the football club rent the facility on match days for a modest rent. All it needs is the drive and vision. The inability to grow the business and complete the ground development during the decade in the Premier League, unlike clubs like Leicester and Middlesbrough is symptomatic. Apologies to some for sounding negative, but I am trying to be constructive. PS The Leicester coverage was excellent including commentary, and parallel reports on the Rotherham match. I'm sure the cost of such a service does not run many £millions. |
|
|
|
Post by zerps on Jul 29, 2019 16:59:32 GMT
Is this another one of those threads where retards like to slate the club they support covered in dribble?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 29, 2019 22:36:04 GMT
Is this another one of those threads where retards like to slate the club they support covered in dribble? In all fairness mate I watched and covered all 46 matches last season through the streaming service and I feel I am in a position where I should be allowed to voice my opinion since I went through a lot during those streams. Some serious eye strain during the frequent flickergate matches and hoping I didn't blink or need a piss because if a goal was scored I'd have shit all chance of catching it again unless I was lucky on Twitter since we decided replays in a sport stream were of no importance. Just so many things that were inadequate. |
|
