|
Post by noustie on Feb 12, 2021 12:13:18 GMT
I wish them nothing but happiness and would happily buy them a drink for the reaction and facial expressions of the elite when they unleashed the Gospel Preacher at the wedding alone even aside from the charity stuff.
|
|
|
Post by prestwichpotter on Feb 12, 2021 12:16:34 GMT
If they're no longer costing us any money as tax payers then that's an absolute bonus as far as I'm concerned. And beyond that they're two people with flaws like the rest of us living their lives so let them get on with it......
|
|
|
Post by The Drunken Communist on Feb 16, 2021 9:47:44 GMT
I see they're now doing a 'tell-all' TV Special with Oprah Winfrey.
|
|
|
Post by hcstokie on Feb 16, 2021 9:50:19 GMT
I see they're now doing a 'tell-all' TV Special with Oprah Winfrey. Yes, but please respect their privacy.
|
|
|
Post by Dave the Rave on Feb 16, 2021 10:16:03 GMT
Some people really don't get what privacy is about, do they?
It's about choice.
They are perfectly entitled to ask for privacy whilst also choosing to make public what they wish to make public.
Doing the odd interview doesn't give the media the right to invasively pry into every aspect of your life.
We all have aspects of our lives we'd like to remain private, revealing some things about ourselves does not automatically mean we should accept having everything about us made public.
|
|
|
Post by eddyclamp on Feb 16, 2021 10:17:12 GMT
I see they're now doing a 'tell-all' TV Special with Oprah Winfrey. Yes, but please respect their privacy. Spot on
|
|
|
Post by hcstokie on Feb 16, 2021 10:38:29 GMT
Some people really don't get what privacy is about, do they? It's about choice. They are perfectly entitled to ask for privacy whilst also choosing to make public what they wish to make public. Doing the odd interview doesn't give the media the right to invasively pry into every aspect of your life. We all have aspects of our lives we'd like to remain private, revealing some things about ourselves does not automatically mean we should accept having everything about us made public. I agree to an extent. Personally, I couldn’t give a toss what they get up to, or any other celebrity for that matter. What I don’t like with these two (and others) is the sheer hypocrisy of them. Their privacy isn’t important to them otherwise they wouldn’t want to do any interviews about their private life. What is important to them is the fact that they don’t want any negative publicity. They say they value privacy and moved away to afford their son the opportunity to grow up away from the media. Next minute, they’re doing interviews and including their son in their bloody podcast. If they want a private life then they should withdraw from activities that generate media interest but they know that that’s when the money would dry up. Unfortunately they seem to want everything their own way.
|
|
|
Post by xchpotter on Feb 16, 2021 11:38:36 GMT
I would love to know what has been going on from both sides, hers and Harry’s and the royal family. I’ve watched The Crown, so it must be like that, no?😂😂
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Feb 16, 2021 13:35:05 GMT
It’s possible that she’s as bad as several posters claim in this thread but unless they know Harry and Meghan on a personal level then such claims are pretty much pointless.
It’s interesting though, what makes people so confident to make claims about people they don’t know. It’s rife in society, and quite frankly, a bit strange.
|
|
|
Post by telfordstoke on Feb 16, 2021 14:36:04 GMT
I would love to know what has been going on from both sides, hers and Harry’s and the royal family. I’ve watched The Crown, so it must be like that, no?😂😂 Listened gobsmacked on Zoom while mother in law expounded this very point " ooh no smoke without fire so the Crown must be 99% accurate" etc yikes !!
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Feb 16, 2021 14:52:51 GMT
Nothing more than a pair of media loving whores
If you swim with fishes don’t whinge when a shark bites your arse
|
|
|
Post by flea79 on Feb 16, 2021 15:06:28 GMT
strip them off the titles and lets see how well they can be marketed then
this happened once before when a divorced american got involved with the royal family, it didnt end well then either
|
|
|
Post by ColonelMustard on Feb 16, 2021 15:20:51 GMT
Royal gossip really does get people going doesnt it. I'll have a go. I mean whatever the pluses and minuses of Meghan might be, Harry hasnt felt the need to stray as he? Unlike his brother.
|
|
|
Post by salopstick on Feb 16, 2021 15:47:58 GMT
Some people really don't get what privacy is about, do they? It's about choice. They are perfectly entitled to ask for privacy whilst also choosing to make public what they wish to make public. Doing the odd interview doesn't give the media the right to invasively pry into every aspect of your life. We all have aspects of our lives we'd like to remain private, revealing some things about ourselves does not automatically mean we should accept having everything about us made public. I agree to an extent. Personally, I couldn’t give a toss what they get up to, or any other celebrity for that matter. What I don’t like with these two (and others) is the sheer hypocrisy of them. Their privacy isn’t important to them otherwise they wouldn’t want to do any interviews about their private life. What is important to them is the fact that they don’t want any negative publicity. They say they value privacy and moved away to afford their son the opportunity to grow up away from the media. Next minute, they’re doing interviews and including their son in their bloody podcast. If they want a private life then they should withdraw from activities that generate media interest but they know that that’s when the money would dry up. Unfortunately they seem to want everything their own way. Spot on. Some celebrities court publicity and make a living from it. They can’t ask for privacy when it suits them (certain things like kids are off limits though) Harry and Meghan are very hypocritical with their privacy
|
|
|
Post by flea79 on Feb 16, 2021 16:12:09 GMT
Royal gossip really does get people going doesnt it. I'll have a go. I mean whatever the pluses and minuses of Meghan might be, Harry hasnt felt the need to stray as he? Unlike his brother. i had forgotten that one! wonder whether it was true, the Gary Janetti instagram that parodies George and other royals had a field day with it
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 16, 2021 16:15:11 GMT
I agree to an extent. Personally, I couldn’t give a toss what they get up to, or any other celebrity for that matter. What I don’t like with these two (and others) is the sheer hypocrisy of them. Their privacy isn’t important to them otherwise they wouldn’t want to do any interviews about their private life. What is important to them is the fact that they don’t want any negative publicity. They say they value privacy and moved away to afford their son the opportunity to grow up away from the media. Next minute, they’re doing interviews and including their son in their bloody podcast. If they want a private life then they should withdraw from activities that generate media interest but they know that that’s when the money would dry up. Unfortunately they seem to want everything their own way. Spot on. Some celebrities court publicity and make a living from it. They can’t ask for privacy when it suits them (certain things like kids are off limits though) Harry and Meghan are very hypocritical with their privacy Diana was the same. Privacy when suited her and the World's press in tow when on one of her so called humanitarian projects and then reveals all on TV
|
|
|
Post by foster on Feb 16, 2021 16:18:14 GMT
The only thing that celebs do that I pay any interest in is humanitarian / environmental work.
Nothing else is of interest.
|
|
|
Post by franklin on Feb 16, 2021 16:22:29 GMT
Some people really don't get what privacy is about, do they? It's about choice. They are perfectly entitled to ask for privacy whilst also choosing to make public what they wish to make public. Doing the odd interview doesn't give the media the right to invasively pry into every aspect of your life. We all have aspects of our lives we'd like to remain private, revealing some things about ourselves does not automatically mean we should accept having everything about us made public. Nah I'm pretty sure its about being paid.
|
|
|
Post by dirtclod on Feb 16, 2021 16:59:10 GMT
In her case, expecting privacy while marrying Royal family and doing TV Shows? That's either hypocritical, very stupid or both. The media is like the mob - once you step into it, you don't just get out when you want. What the media does to people is so wrong, but for god's sake it is what it is. I don't know her, but no sympathy's forthcoming either, seems a slight hint of Kardashian flavor. As for him - unfortunately he was born into media scrutiny and I can't say how much was his fault, other than marrying her in the first place.
Just like those who want to get a close up picture of the cute little bear cub with its mama... just need to get a little bit closer... That's what playing with the media is like.
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Feb 16, 2021 17:08:46 GMT
Some people really don't get what privacy is about, do they? It's about choice. They are perfectly entitled to ask for privacy whilst also choosing to make public what they wish to make public. Doing the odd interview doesn't give the media the right to invasively pry into every aspect of your life. We all have aspects of our lives we'd like to remain private, revealing some things about ourselves does not automatically mean we should accept having everything about us made public. I agree to an extent. Personally, I couldn’t give a toss what they get up to, or any other celebrity for that matter. What I don’t like with these two (and others) is the sheer hypocrisy of them. Their privacy isn’t important to them otherwise they wouldn’t want to do any interviews about their private life. What is important to them is the fact that they don’t want any negative publicity. They say they value privacy and moved away to afford their son the opportunity to grow up away from the media. Next minute, they’re doing interviews and including their son in their bloody podcast. If they want a private life then they should withdraw from activities that generate media interest but they know that that’s when the money would dry up. Unfortunately they seem to want everything their own way. Spot on and then start playing the victims
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Feb 16, 2021 17:22:23 GMT
It’s possible that she’s as bad as several posters claim in this thread but unless they know Harry and Meghan on a personal level then such claims are pretty much pointless. It’s interesting though, what makes people so confident to make claims about people they don’t know. It’s rife in society, and quite frankly, a bit strange. Completely agree, and then I scrolled down just two posts below yours
|
|
|
Post by FbrgVaStkFan on Feb 23, 2021 23:05:04 GMT
Brutal, but funny.
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Feb 24, 2021 23:25:23 GMT
I can't see what Meg and Hazzer have actually done to piss people off.
As long as Prince Andrew slips under the radar. That's the main thing.
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Feb 25, 2021 8:02:39 GMT
I can't see what Meg and Hazzer have actually done to piss people off. As long as Prince Andrew slips under the radar. That's the main thing. In short, they've made the very sensible decision to leave the royal family. That has pissed off the right wing press because nothing can be allowed to be even the tiniest bit critical or questioning of their exalted status, even having a friend of a convicted nonce in the ranks. And of course, all those people who are not at all influenced by what they absorb from the press have reacted in predictable ways.
|
|
|
Post by raythesailor on Feb 26, 2021 10:21:33 GMT
I see today Fri 26th the publicity shy couple are again on the TV . Harry doing a open bus top interview.
The content worthy of any of the numerous daytime trash TV programs available to people who want to adopt a quiet public profile. 🤮
|
|
|
Post by mattyd2 on Feb 26, 2021 10:38:03 GMT
I can't see what Meg and Hazzer have actually done to piss people off. As long as Prince Andrew slips under the radar. That's the main thing. Ay up Jo. Makes you wonder if all the fuss and public battles have been orchestrated to take the spotlight away from Prince Paedo.
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Feb 26, 2021 10:47:00 GMT
I can't see what Meg and Hazzer have actually done to piss people off. As long as Prince Andrew slips under the radar. That's the main thing. Ay up Jo. Makes you wonder if all the fuss and public battles have been orchestrated to take the spotlight away from Prince Paedo. Well it's worked out to be very convenient for him. And it's surprising how blatant the press have been in overlooking Andrew's situation
|
|
|
Post by Rednwhitenblue on Feb 26, 2021 12:24:19 GMT
Ay up Jo. Makes you wonder if all the fuss and public battles have been orchestrated to take the spotlight away from Prince Paedo. Well it's worked out to be very convenient for him. And it's surprising how blatant the press have been in overlooking Andrew's situation To be fair to the Daily Mail, it has been more interested in Andrew than you'd expect from such a paper. Quite surprising. Most of the rest, however, with the exception of The Guardian, have been largely ignoring his refusal to go to the US to provide evidence, and have carried numerous articles questioning the validity of the evidence of his involvement at all and the 'character' of Virginia Roberts. You only need to look at the front pages of our press and see how many times a flattering pic of one of the royals is given space to know that they are essentially untouchable.
|
|
|
Post by followyoudown on Feb 26, 2021 12:41:07 GMT
Ay up Jo. Makes you wonder if all the fuss and public battles have been orchestrated to take the spotlight away from Prince Paedo. Well it's worked out to be very convenient for him. And it's surprising how blatant the press have been in overlooking Andrew's situation Dont think its been overlooked he was ripped to shreds for weeks until the fbi make formal moves to interview him in the uk or usa its a she says he is a paedo he says he doesnt sweat story. The convenience here seems to be hewitts lad blaming the press for a fallout with his family.
|
|
|
Post by mattyd2 on Mar 1, 2021 10:43:18 GMT
Anyone gonna bother. I certainly wont. Cant bloody well do with Harpo TBH.
And although a big fan of Harry I have got to say I am a tad disappointed that he is on one hand saying that he fled UK to lead a more private life, then on the other bearing his soul on N£tflix.
|
|