|
|
Post by cousindupree on Sept 16, 2018 14:36:50 GMT
Genuine question, didn't see game or hear commentary what's the fans view?
|
|
|
|
Post by wardy1979 on Sept 16, 2018 14:39:03 GMT
I Dont think he would be missed mate, if he missed the rest of the season.
Terrible signing, Terrible player
|
|
|
|
Post by smatty88 on Sept 16, 2018 14:47:28 GMT
Not for me but we're so short of options out wide that's why I was surprised not to see Bauer on the bench again, even us a back up for Diouf and Ince.
|
|
|
|
Post by george2again on Sept 16, 2018 14:52:27 GMT
Clearly he will be back in the side for Diouf when fit (Rowetts, I bought him so he plays pet). I would put Bauer on the right now and we can forget about that talent-less tvvat for the rest of the season. Defo Bauer for Diouf on Tuesday
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2018 14:54:17 GMT
I’m going to disagree.
Ince on the right, JM on the left, would have ensured that Diouf wasn’t offside 25 times yesterday.
|
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Sept 16, 2018 14:56:57 GMT
For me yes. He was excellent v Hull and gives us more balance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2018 15:26:16 GMT
He was missed in the sense that Diouf is still costing us points in The Championship.
|
|
|
|
Post by adamsson on Sept 16, 2018 15:30:35 GMT
He wouldn't have missed the number of chances Diouf did.
Of course he wouldn't have had the number of chances Diouf did.
And would probably have scored the same number of goals.
|
|
|
|
Post by liamo on Sept 16, 2018 15:35:45 GMT
I think he'd have put at least one of the chances away that Diouf missed tbh
|
|
|
|
Post by fentonstokie1 on Sept 16, 2018 20:37:49 GMT
For me yes. He was excellent v Hull and gives us more balance. Agree totally, forget the supposed IRA sympathy bollocks he has shown signs of being a very useful player in this division |
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Sept 16, 2018 20:49:05 GMT
Clearly he will be back in the side for Diouf when fit (Rowetts, I bought him so he plays pet). I would put Bauer on the right now and we can forget about that talent-less tvvat for the rest of the season. Defo Bauer for Diouf on Tuesday Why does a manager buying a player then playing him make him a pet? Especially when he's played better than others that have started every game so far who haven't been signed by the manager? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2018 21:13:31 GMT
Not really.
I can't remember many crosses being put in successfully or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Sept 16, 2018 21:30:28 GMT
Diouf should've been replaced a lot earlier. So in that sense, yes he was missed for not being an option on the bench.
|
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Sept 16, 2018 22:05:02 GMT
Diouf should've been replaced a lot earlier. So in that sense, yes he was missed for not being an option on the bench. Diouf had to stay on until he dropped because he provided cover for Pieters. |
|
|
|
Post by terrorofturfmoor on Sept 16, 2018 22:12:42 GMT
For me No, because with the players we have, I'd rather have Ince on the left, and Bauer on the right!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by GeneralFaye on Sept 16, 2018 22:13:26 GMT
Diouf should've been replaced a lot earlier. So in that sense, yes he was missed for not being an option on the bench. Diouf had to stay on until he dropped because he provided cover for Pieters. But he was fucked for a period of time before he came off, which is my point of having someone suitable on the bench which we didn't have. |
|
|
|
Post by samba :) on Sept 16, 2018 22:21:08 GMT
Bad signing bad person bad footballer
|
|
|
|
Post by BuzzB on Sept 16, 2018 22:35:34 GMT
Clearly he will be back in the side for Diouf when fit (Rowetts, I bought him so he plays pet). I would put Bauer on the right now and we can forget about that talent-less tvvat for the rest of the season. Defo Bauer for Diouf on Tuesday Why does a manager buying a player then playing him make him a pet? Especially when he's played better than others that have started every game so far who haven't been signed by the manager? I remember Tone having a pet Creswell and latterly a pet Walters. Just saying...... |
|
|
|
Post by bloodtypered on Sept 16, 2018 22:48:07 GMT
I was there.....I think mclean would have been better than douf
|
|
|
|
Post by jezzascfc on Sept 16, 2018 22:59:58 GMT
He may not have got into the forward positions Diouf got into to miss chances, but he would also not have been offside so many times to cause moves to break down and would have put in some better crosses. I think we missed him as a natural left winger out there. It is not Diouf's natural position.
|
|
|
|
Post by JoeinOz on Sept 16, 2018 23:01:28 GMT
He might have scored one of the chances we wasted.
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Sept 16, 2018 23:23:38 GMT
Diouf is utter crap out wide, constantly off side, and the sitters he missed makes me wonder who he bribed to convince everyone he's a striker, he had the odd good moment but I think McClean would have been a much better option, he's been playing well recently.
|
|
|
|
Post by entropy92 on Sept 16, 2018 23:29:33 GMT
He might have scored one of the chances we wasted. Its alright saying that mate but i doubt Mclean would of been in those positions |
|
|
|
Post by TexasPotter on Sept 16, 2018 23:40:12 GMT
Pick your poison for me, both dreadful on the wing lately, would you rather 25 offsides or 25 crosses into the Q stand? We are missing another Ince like player to push up the table imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by Veritas on Sept 17, 2018 8:10:54 GMT
Genuine question, didn't see game or hear commentary what's the fans view? Yes |
|
|
|
Post by StaffordPotter on Sept 17, 2018 11:35:54 GMT
No.
|
|
|
|
Post by cheekymatt71 on Sept 17, 2018 12:13:58 GMT
Yes and No  |
|
|
|
Post by j3st3r on Sept 17, 2018 13:45:50 GMT
Diouf should've been replaced a lot earlier. So in that sense, yes he was missed for not being an option on the bench. Do you mean like... in 2016..? If so then Yes 100% |
|
