|
|
Post by gonk on Mar 26, 2018 15:24:09 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 26, 2018 15:27:10 GMT
I'm sure a lot of clubs may be at the wire for their FFP.
But they do need to be careful or else they could be in serious trouble for example pompey.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmygscfc on Mar 26, 2018 15:47:16 GMT
'But they do need to be careful or else they could be in serious trouble for example pompey.'
Considered and expert analysis once again, Gifty. Thanks for sharing.
|
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 26, 2018 15:54:15 GMT
'But they do need to be careful or else they could be in serious trouble for example pompey.' Considered and expert analysis once again, Gifty. Thanks for sharing. Have you ever noticed the quote button? Curious, Jimbo |
|
|
|
Post by gonk on Mar 26, 2018 15:55:10 GMT
I'm sure a lot of clubs may be at the wire for their FFP. But they do need to be careful or else they could be in serious trouble for example pompey. I would think they are worried that unless they can draw some money from transfer’s they will have to use what they have if they get relegated.Can not think of many of there players that are going to go for big money and most are at the wrong age. |
|
|
|
Post by Boothen on Mar 26, 2018 16:02:00 GMT
Anybody else detest posters who do fuck all but post a dodgy looking link with no information in their opening post?
|
|
|
|
Post by Northy on Mar 26, 2018 16:02:05 GMT
Not sure, the short term cash is used up but the last statement shows they have made a big profit last time - Jenkins’s remarks came even though accounts filed up to June 2017 show pre-tax profits rose to £39.7m from £1m. I think our own club has been running worse accounts ? |
|
|
|
Post by mrcoke on Mar 26, 2018 16:05:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmygscfc on Mar 26, 2018 16:17:37 GMT
'But they do need to be careful or else they could be in serious trouble for example pompey.' Considered and expert analysis once again, Gifty. Thanks for sharing. Have you ever noticed the quote button? Curious, Jimbo Personal preference lad, but just to make you happy...Looking forward to more of your staggering insights. |
|
|
|
Post by felonious on Mar 26, 2018 16:37:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Mar 26, 2018 16:51:52 GMT
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Toxic Tony leaves a trail of destruction.
|
|
|
|
Post by CBUFAWKIPWH on Mar 26, 2018 17:09:09 GMT
And there are some on here who think "sustainability" is a dirty word and want to see our financially prudent board replaced by a dumb ass sugar daddy prepared to mortgage the clubs future for a bit of short term success,
We may well go down with West Brom but if those reports are true I know whose shoes I'd rather be in.
And be careful what you wish for...
|
|
|
|
Post by ursemboys on Mar 26, 2018 17:13:49 GMT
lets sell to the Chinese some said ,give me the Coates family any day
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Mar 26, 2018 19:02:48 GMT
And there are some on here who think "sustainability" is a dirty word and want to see our financially prudent board replaced by a dumb ass sugar daddy prepared to mortgage the clubs future for a bit of short term success, We may well go down with West Brom but if those reports are true I know whose shoes I'd rather be in. And be careful what you wish for... You do realise we owe Coates about 70m and the club and the ground aren't linked other than the bet365 link? Everything is rosey though! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2018 19:23:02 GMT
And there are some on here who think "sustainability" is a dirty word and want to see our financially prudent board replaced by a dumb ass sugar daddy prepared to mortgage the clubs future for a bit of short term success, We may well go down with West Brom but if those reports are true I know whose shoes I'd rather be in. And be careful what you wish for... Ahh the old careful what you wish for... Not heard that little gem for a while. The careful what we wish for has seen Stoke City become one of the lowest spenders over the last 5 seasons, the careful what you wish for will likely see us lose our Premier League status and huge financial power from it. Add to that we will be stripped of any decent players we have and i would image most of the income from sales will go back to paying debts and we will be left with a small budget in the Championship. A league we will likely spend many years in. How are Sunderland doing with their prudent approach to not spending money over the last few years? |
|
|
|
Post by terryconroysmagic on Mar 26, 2018 19:38:55 GMT
How the fuck has this happened to WBA so quickly?
|
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Mar 26, 2018 19:40:42 GMT
How the fuck has this happened to WBA so quickly? It does seem either incredibly fishy or utter bullshit to make the new bloke look good. |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Mar 26, 2018 19:56:10 GMT
And there are some on here who think "sustainability" is a dirty word and want to see our financially prudent board replaced by a dumb ass sugar daddy prepared to mortgage the clubs future for a bit of short term success, We may well go down with West Brom but if those reports are true I know whose shoes I'd rather be in. And be careful what you wish for... Ahh the old careful what you wish for... Not heard that little gem for a while. The careful what we wish for has seen Stoke City become one of the lowest spenders over the last 5 seasons, the careful what you wish for will likely see us lose our Premier League status and huge financial power from it. Add to that we will be stripped of any decent players we have and i would image most of the income from sales will go back to paying debts and we will be left with a small budget in the Championship. A league we will likely spend many years in. How are Sunderland doing with their prudent approach to not spending money over the last few years? The lack of spending hasn't helped but we had the basis of a good team that just needed fine tuning but through dreadful management and wasting what money we did have are the reason we're in the mess we're in. If we'd bought the right players in and drafted in Badou and Bauer in August we wouldn't be where we are now but we acted to slowly leaving ourselves short in key positions. Berahino, Wimmer and Imbula deals and the lack of addressing our mistakes are why we are where we are and why massive changes in the summers will need to be made and where it will take seasons to get back to where we were 3 seasons ago. |
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Mar 26, 2018 21:50:19 GMT
And there are some on here who think "sustainability" is a dirty word and want to see our financially prudent board replaced by a dumb ass sugar daddy prepared to mortgage the clubs future for a bit of short term success, We may well go down with West Brom but if those reports are true I know whose shoes I'd rather be in. And be careful what you wish for... Bournemouth Russian owner , 12,000 gates , 137m turnover , 20% increase in salary costs , £14m profit go outband buy Bego and Ake , and Defoe , financially prudent doesn’t mean cut investment until your relegated . |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Mar 27, 2018 6:39:02 GMT
And there are some on here who think "sustainability" is a dirty word and want to see our financially prudent board replaced by a dumb ass sugar daddy prepared to mortgage the clubs future for a bit of short term success, We may well go down with West Brom but if those reports are true I know whose shoes I'd rather be in. And be careful what you wish for... Bournemouth Russian owner , 12,000 gates , 137m turnover , 20% increase in salary costs , £14m profit go outband buy Bego and Ake , and Defoe , financially prudent doesn’t mean cut investment until your relegated . Ake Defoe and begovic all together less than we spent on the pissed up dwarf from West Brom So I’m not sure what you’re trying to prove here There has been no lack of investment at Stoke its who we invested in is the problem and how the money was spent |
|
|
|
Post by bayernoatcake on Mar 27, 2018 7:10:24 GMT
Bournemouth Russian owner , 12,000 gates , 137m turnover , 20% increase in salary costs , £14m profit go outband buy Bego and Ake , and Defoe , financially prudent doesn’t mean cut investment until your relegated . Ake Defoe and begovic all together less than we spent on the pissed up dwarf from West Brom So I’m not sure what you’re trying to prove here There has been no lack of investment at Stoke its who we invested in is the problem and how the money was spent Berahino was 12m wasn't he? They spent that on Bego didn't they? |
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Mar 27, 2018 7:12:08 GMT
Bournemouth Russian owner , 12,000 gates , 137m turnover , 20% increase in salary costs , £14m profit go outband buy Bego and Ake , and Defoe , financially prudent doesn’t mean cut investment until your relegated . Ake Defoe and begovic all together less than we spent on the pissed up dwarf from West Brom So I’m not sure what you’re trying to prove here There has been no lack of investment at Stoke its who we invested in is the problem and how the money was spent Factually incorrect I afraid 1 Ake was £20m on his own . 2 Plus £8M for Bego 3 Plus Defoe on 130k per week 4 we have been one of the two the lowest spenders in th league for three of the last five years and 15th and 16th for the other toe despite finishing 9th in three of those under punching by miles 5 You are right on what we have spent has been done appallingly within the transfer structure created and managed by Mr Scholes |
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Mar 27, 2018 7:41:54 GMT
Ake Defoe and begovic all together less than we spent on the pissed up dwarf from West Brom So I’m not sure what you’re trying to prove here There has been no lack of investment at Stoke its who we invested in is the problem and how the money was spent Factually incorrect I afraid 1 Ake was £20m on his own . 2 Plus £8M for Bego 3 Plus Defoe on 130k per week 4 we have been one of the two the lowest spenders in th league for three of the last five years and 15th and 16th for the other toe despite finishing 9th in three of those under punching by miles 5 You are right on what we have spent has been done appallingly within the transfer structure created and managed by Mr Scholes So what do you make of West Brom's financial problems then? |
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 27, 2018 8:00:46 GMT
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Toxic Tony leaves a trail of destruction. Just like Mark Hughes has here then? |
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Mar 27, 2018 8:11:20 GMT
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha Toxic Tony leaves a trail of destruction. Just like Mark Hughes has here then? Probably yeah, but you’ve chosen not to mention Pulis and his side of the shambles that is WBA If this was Stoke though you’d be all over Hughes like a rash |
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 27, 2018 8:40:33 GMT
Just like Mark Hughes has here then? Probably yeah, but you’ve chosen not to mention Pulis and his side of the shambles that is WBA If this was Stoke though you’d be all over Hughes like a rash Pulis isn't in charge of how the club run's (Finance wise) and how the finances come in and out. if he wants players that the club cant afford, they should have said so. You simply can't blame Pulis for that. However, wasting £50M on players is certainly down to Hughes. |
|
|
|
Post by sheikhmomo on Mar 27, 2018 8:48:04 GMT
Most Baggies fans at work see it as a massive red herring and simply an exercise in softening them up for the inevitable cull at the end of the season. Sturridge will go, the Polish lad will go, Barry will go and that’s over £400k a week saved instantly. Bit of a non story from a puffed up Chief Executive creating his own narrative for turning things around.
|
|
|
|
Post by 3putts on Mar 27, 2018 9:03:37 GMT
And there are some on here who think "sustainability" is a dirty word and want to see our financially prudent board replaced by a dumb ass sugar daddy prepared to mortgage the clubs future for a bit of short term success, We may well go down with West Brom but if those reports are true I know whose shoes I'd rather be in. And be careful what you wish for... be careful posting sensible stuff on here. they don't like it! |
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Mar 27, 2018 9:16:32 GMT
Most Baggies fans at work see it as a massive red herring and simply an exercise in softening them up for the inevitable cull at the end of the season. Sturridge will go, the Polish lad will go, Barry will go and that’s over £400k a week saved instantly. Bit of a non story from a puffed up Chief Executive creating his own narrative for turning things around. Yup he only left in December 16 and returned Feb 18 so there's been 3 transfer windows. 1st Window they effectively swapped Saido for Livermore The last one they took Sturridge on loan Just leaves last summer where they Invested around 40 million on 6 players so yeah the wage bill will go up but then so did TV money last season. |
|
|
|
Post by werrington on Mar 27, 2018 9:44:26 GMT
Probably yeah, but you’ve chosen not to mention Pulis and his side of the shambles that is WBA If this was Stoke though you’d be all over Hughes like a rash Pulis isn't in charge of how the club run's (Finance wise) and how the finances come in and out. if he wants players that the club cant afford, they should have said so. You simply can't blame Pulis for that. However, wasting £50M on players is certainly down to Hughes. Standard reply |
|
