|
Post by eddyclamp on Mar 14, 2018 10:14:12 GMT
I bet the forwards at Southampton are now trying to work out which one of them will play at full back.
|
|
|
Post by knowingeye on Mar 14, 2018 10:17:47 GMT
I don't think he can save them and I think Hughes has to think very carefully about his next job. Sounds like it's happening though and all I know is there will be a lot more money on the table than we were paying him. Well i would love to play them next year. LOVE TOO. Mark and his cronies can fuck right off. One of the worst premier league managers ever, ruined club after club and had 1 lucky decent role at fulham. Fulham? www.managerstats.co.uk/managers/mark-hughes/
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 10:19:25 GMT
Well i would love to play them next year. LOVE TOO. Mark and his cronies can fuck right off. One of the worst premier league managers ever, ruined club after club and had 1 lucky decent role at fulham. Fulham? www.managerstats.co.uk/managers/mark-hughes/Got confused, my bad, meant Blackburn.
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Mar 14, 2018 12:39:11 GMT
I don't think he can save them and I think Hughes has to think very carefully about his next job. Sounds like it's happening though and all I know is there will be a lot more money on the table than we were paying him. Well i would love to play them next year. LOVE TOO. Mark and his cronies can fuck right off. One of the worst premier league managers ever, ruined club after club and had 1 lucky decent role at Blackburn Hyperbolic, disingenuous nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 12:40:15 GMT
Well i would love to play them next year. LOVE TOO. Mark and his cronies can fuck right off. One of the worst premier league managers ever, ruined club after club and had 1 lucky decent role at Blackburn Hyperbolic, disingenuous nonsense. Do explain how i have deliberately exaggerated it?
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Mar 14, 2018 12:42:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Mar 14, 2018 12:43:07 GMT
Hyperbolic, disingenuous nonsense. Do explain how i have deliberately exaggerated it? One of the worst Premier League managers ever? Ruined club after club? It's absolute nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 12:43:17 GMT
What a great job being a footy manager is. Do a wank job, get sacked, get paid up, play golf, relax, 5 weeks later get a new job, and repeat...What a way to boost yr wages.. They should say we will pay you up as per yr contract on a weekly basis, until you get a job elsewhere, then our wages stop...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 12:45:35 GMT
Thank fuck we have already played em twice, though you just know it is written in the stars, he keeps them up at our expense...Wonder if he fancies Berra and Wimmer..
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 12:48:19 GMT
Do explain how i have deliberately exaggerated it? One of the worst Premier League managers ever? Ruined club after club? It's absolute nonsense. QPR he tore to shreds and relegated them, got sacked from city because they gave him all the money in the world and still couldn't finish above 6th. Now hes ruined and relegated us. Well done mark. "Speaking after being announced as Stoke's new manager, Hughes admitted that he had a point to prove following his disappointing spell at QPR", Point proven mark, you've made it clear you cant manage.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Mar 14, 2018 12:52:52 GMT
One of the worst Premier League managers ever? Ruined club after club? It's absolute nonsense. QPR he tore to shreds and relegated them, got sacked from city because they gave him all the money in the world and still couldn't finish above 6th. Now hes ruined and relegated us. Well done mark. "Speaking after being announced as Stoke's new manager, Hughes admitted that he had a point to prove following his disappointing spell at QPR", Point proven mark, you've made it clear you cant manage. that isn't strictly true is it? He actually saved QPR from relegation, was sacked after 12 games the following season and Harry Redknapp took them down. Fulham he did a good job. Blackburn he did a terrific job. At Stoke he had 3 good years before a series of bad signings saw the wheels come off.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 12:55:39 GMT
QPR he tore to shreds and relegated them, got sacked from city because they gave him all the money in the world and still couldn't finish above 6th. Now hes ruined and relegated us. Well done mark. "Speaking after being announced as Stoke's new manager, Hughes admitted that he had a point to prove following his disappointing spell at QPR", Point proven mark, you've made it clear you cant manage. that isn't strictly true is it? He actually saved QPR from relegation, was sacked after 12 games the following season and Harry Redknapp took them down. Fulham he did a good job. Blackburn he did a terrific job. At Stoke he had 3 good years before a series of bad signings saw the wheels come off. Fulham he wasnt amazing, he did plain jane average. Blackburn he did a good job, and he sunk QPR, how on eath you can blame Redknapp is just not true. Blaming redknapp is like blaming lambert for taking us down. He: Shafted QPR Shafted Stoke Did average at Fulham Got sacked and did poorly at man city (considering the money he had) And got lucky at blackburn and had a good spell there. 20% rate of doing well out of 100% Shocking
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Mar 14, 2018 12:57:40 GMT
One of the worst Premier League managers ever? Ruined club after club? It's absolute nonsense. QPR he tore to shreds and relegated them, got sacked from city because they gave him all the money in the world and still couldn't finish above 6th. Now hes ruined and relegated us. Well done mark. Is failing to finish 6th 'ruining' a club? I don't think so, he also didn't 'ruin' Blackburn or Fulham either. There's at least 3 clubs he hasn't ruined. Did he do a bad job at QPR? Yes Is he a big part of the reason we're in such a mess? Absolutely. He was a good manager for us during the first few years of his tenure, he definitely lost his way and should have been sacked earlier, but your attempt at re-writing history is so transparently disingenuous.
|
|
|
Post by jimmygscfc on Mar 14, 2018 12:59:31 GMT
that isn't strictly true is it? He actually saved QPR from relegation, was sacked after 12 games the following season and Harry Redknapp took them down. Fulham he did a good job. Blackburn he did a terrific job. At Stoke he had 3 good years before a series of bad signings saw the wheels come off. Fulham he wasnt amazing, he did plain jane average. Blackburn he did a good job, and he sunk QPR, how on eath you can blame Redknapp is just not true. Blaming redknapp is like blaming lambert for taking us down. He: Shafted QPR Shafted Stoke Did average at Fulham Got sacked and did poorly at man city (considering the money he had) And got lucky at blackburn and had a good spell there. 20% rate of doing well out of 100% Shocking Hysterical nonsense lad.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 12:59:36 GMT
QPR he tore to shreds and relegated them, got sacked from city because they gave him all the money in the world and still couldn't finish above 6th. Now hes ruined and relegated us. Well done mark. Is failing to finish 6th 'ruining' a club? I don't think so, he also didn't 'ruin' Blackburn or Fulham either. There's at least 3 clubs he hasn't ruined. Did he do a bad job at QPR? Yes Is he a big part of the reason we're in such a mess? Absolutely. He was a good manager for us during the first few years of his tenure, he definitely lost his way and should have been sacked earlier, but your attempt at re-writing history is so transparently disingenuous. At man city, given the money he had to spend, he did one awful job, hence the sack he got. Didn't ruin fulham or man city, but did shaft us and qpr.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 13:00:04 GMT
Fulham he wasnt amazing, he did plain jane average. Blackburn he did a good job, and he sunk QPR, how on eath you can blame Redknapp is just not true. Blaming redknapp is like blaming lambert for taking us down. He: Shafted QPR Shafted Stoke Did average at Fulham Got sacked and did poorly at man city (considering the money he had) And got lucky at blackburn and had a good spell there. 20% rate of doing well out of 100% Shocking Hysterical nonsense lad. Defend him all you want jimmy
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Mar 14, 2018 13:02:21 GMT
that isn't strictly true is it? He actually saved QPR from relegation, was sacked after 12 games the following season and Harry Redknapp took them down. Fulham he did a good job. Blackburn he did a terrific job. At Stoke he had 3 good years before a series of bad signings saw the wheels come off. Fulham he wasnt amazing, he did plain jane average. Blackburn he did a good job, and he sunk QPR, how on eath you can blame Redknapp is just not true. Blaming redknapp is like blaming lambert for taking us down. He: Shafted QPR Shafted Stoke Did average at Fulham Got sacked and did poorly at man city (considering the money he had) And got lucky at blackburn and had a good spell there. 20% rate of doing well out of 100% Shocking He got Fulham their 2nd ever highest finish in the premier league, how is that average ? You're trying to blame Pardew for WBA relegation that's how people can blame Harry Redknapp for QPR's.
|
|
|
Post by Rick Grimes on Mar 14, 2018 13:08:36 GMT
Is failing to finish 6th 'ruining' a club? I don't think so, he also didn't 'ruin' Blackburn or Fulham either. There's at least 3 clubs he hasn't ruined. Did he do a bad job at QPR? Yes Is he a big part of the reason we're in such a mess? Absolutely. He was a good manager for us during the first few years of his tenure, he definitely lost his way and should have been sacked earlier, but your attempt at re-writing history is so transparently disingenuous. At man city, given the money he had to spend, he did one awful job, hence the sack he got. Didn't ruin fulham or man city, but did shaft us and qpr. The reason I took issue with what you said is because you claimed he's " ruined club after club" which clearly isn't true, you've just admitted as much. He's also not the worst Premier League manager either, you'll find plenty of managers with far lower win percentages. Three consecutive 9th placed finishes was a great achievement for a club like ours. I could name a long list of Premier League managers worse than Hughes. You should stop embarrassing yourself by attempting to re-write history.
|
|
|
Post by eebygum on Mar 14, 2018 13:14:43 GMT
Ah certainly wouldn't li' ta see 'im doin eur shift ont' farm.
|
|
|
Post by jimmygscfc on Mar 14, 2018 13:35:57 GMT
Defend him all you want jimmy I'm not defending him but you really are interpreting history in your own inimitable way. I was happy to see him go but was also happy with the first three seasons.
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Mar 14, 2018 13:40:11 GMT
48 hours to appoint a manager , and looks like they got their first choice , can’t be surely they should conducting negotiations throght the media , getting turned down on a daily basis , role made to look toxic , finally settling aft er a few weeks for choice god knows what’s , not a bloke who’d has the 7th most premier league wins of all time , after all thy aren’t in London aren’t one of the top six etc .
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Mar 14, 2018 13:46:43 GMT
that isn't strictly true is it? He actually saved QPR from relegation, was sacked after 12 games the following season and Harry Redknapp took them down. Fulham he did a good job. Blackburn he did a terrific job. At Stoke he had 3 good years before a series of bad signings saw the wheels come off. Fulham he wasnt amazing, he did plain jane average. Blackburn he did a good job, and he sunk QPR, how on eath you can blame Redknapp is just not true. Blaming redknapp is like blaming lambert for taking us down. He: Shafted QPR Shafted Stoke Did average at Fulham Got sacked and did poorly at man city (considering the money he had) And got lucky at blackburn and had a good spell there. 20% rate of doing well out of 100% Shocking Weren't you the one saying that WBA relegation was due to Pardew? Redknapp had longer than Pardew to save QPR and failed dismally. Hughes was sacked after 12 games. Redknapp had well over half a season to save them. If we go down, Lambert will have to take a huge slice of the responsibility. He too, had plenty of time to save us, our position when he joined wasn't perilous given we'd only just slipped into the bottom 3, he had good players returning from injury and 3 new players to rely on. If Lambert was even half decent, he'd have saved our skin easily. He isn't and he is going to take us down ably assisted and abetted by Mark Hughes and our transfer team.
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Mar 14, 2018 13:59:05 GMT
Fulham he wasnt amazing, he did plain jane average. Blackburn he did a good job, and he sunk QPR, how on eath you can blame Redknapp is just not true. Blaming redknapp is like blaming lambert for taking us down. He: Shafted QPR Shafted Stoke Did average at Fulham Got sacked and did poorly at man city (considering the money he had) And got lucky at blackburn and had a good spell there. 20% rate of doing well out of 100% Shocking Weren't you the one saying that WBA relegation was due to Pardew? Redknapp had longer than Pardew to save QPR and failed dismally. Hughes was sacked after 12 games. Redknapp had well over half a season to save them. If we go down, Lambert will have to take a huge slice of the responsibility. He too, had plenty of time to save us, our position when he joined wasn't perilous given we'd only just slipped into the bottom 3, he had good players returning from injury and 3 new players to rely on. If Lambert was even half decent, he'd have saved our skin easily. He isn't and he is going to take us down ably assisted and abetted by Mark Hughes and our transfer team. Nail on head , albeit Dave I do believe while lambert is merely demonstrating all the reasons why his appointment was utter nonsense , only the very very best could save this lot and then at a push . in some ways of we go it’s beter we go spectacularly because ou can hear the we nearly did it Paul did a good job we will look in the summer and come back next. Year shit spouting already from Scholes and his cronies We need root root and branch change this summer , new CEO , new transfer team , new management team and quickly so they control the fire sale and the purchase if there are any
|
|
|
Post by shangamuzo on Mar 14, 2018 14:12:44 GMT
Hands up all you adopted Wigan fans. Include me in.
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Mar 14, 2018 14:16:48 GMT
48 hours to appoint a manager , and looks like they got their first choice , can’t be surely they should conducting negotiations throght the media , getting turned down on a daily basis , role made to look toxic , finally settling aft er a few weeks for choice god knows what’s , not a bloke who’d has the 7th most premier league wins of all time , after all thy aren’t in London aren’t one of the top six etc . It's a lot easier when your 'first choice' isn't in a job having been sacked ignominiously from his last one isn't it?
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 14:19:24 GMT
Fulham he wasnt amazing, he did plain jane average. Blackburn he did a good job, and he sunk QPR, how on eath you can blame Redknapp is just not true. Blaming redknapp is like blaming lambert for taking us down. He: Shafted QPR Shafted Stoke Did average at Fulham Got sacked and did poorly at man city (considering the money he had) And got lucky at blackburn and had a good spell there. 20% rate of doing well out of 100% Shocking Weren't you the one saying that WBA relegation was due to Pardew? Redknapp had longer than Pardew to save QPR and failed dismally. Hughes was sacked after 12 games. Redknapp had well over half a season to save them. If we go down, Lambert will have to take a huge slice of the responsibility. He too, had plenty of time to save us, our position when he joined wasn't perilous given we'd only just slipped into the bottom 3, he had good players returning from injury and 3 new players to rely on. If Lambert was even half decent, he'd have saved our skin easily. He isn't and he is going to take us down ably assisted and abetted by Mark Hughes and our transfer team. The damage was down by hughes at stoke, no striker to score goals and we are doomed. He had 4 years to sort this and thought the answer was Berahino who, when signed, hadn't score in a year, massively unfit and failed a drugs test, yet Hughes chased him for 2 seasons and finally decided he was the man at 15 million pounds. WBA relegation is down to Pardew. Pulis didn't leave them 7 points a drift at the bottom of the table, they also had strikers to score them goals. Did Pulis go abroad with them and rob a taxi at the expense of ashaming the club?
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Mar 14, 2018 14:23:56 GMT
48 hours to appoint a manager , and looks like they got their first choice , can’t be surely they should conducting negotiations throght the media , getting turned down on a daily basis , role made to look toxic , finally settling aft er a few weeks for choice god knows what’s , not a bloke who’d has the 7th most premier league wzins of all time , after all thy aren’t in London aren’t one of the top six etc . It's a lot easier when your 'first choice' isn't in a job having been sacked ignominiously from his last one isn't it? Or your prepared to pay the going rate for one of the top 7 premier league match winners funny how lenses can be different .
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Mar 14, 2018 14:32:45 GMT
It's a lot easier when your 'first choice' isn't in a job having been sacked ignominiously from his last one isn't it? Or your prepared to pay the going rate for one of the top 7 premier league match winners funny how lenses can be different . I don't remember you touting him as such when you were bemoaning us missing out on Allardyce to replace him? Not very respectful of 'one of the top 7 premier league match winners' is it?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2018 14:41:45 GMT
Is failing to finish 6th 'ruining' a club? I don't think so, he also didn't 'ruin' Blackburn or Fulham either. There's at least 3 clubs he hasn't ruined. Did he do a bad job at QPR? Yes Is he a big part of the reason we're in such a mess? Absolutely. He was a good manager for us during the first few years of his tenure, he definitely lost his way and should have been sacked earlier, but your attempt at re-writing history is so transparently disingenuous. At man city, given the money he had to spend, he did one awful job, hence the sack he got. Didn't ruin fulham or man city, but did shaft us and qpr. He got one season didn't he? with the owners already determined to get rid and change guard. He really didn't do badly, signed Robinho who was class, and i believe signed Kompany too, the best servant that club has ever had. He was fucking incredible for us for 3 years, turned us from a shitty, rotting, stale club who were on a downward spiral, into a club that genuinely had realistic aspirations of top 7 finishes. He well and truly fucked it right up but there's obviously a good manager there.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Mar 14, 2018 14:47:08 GMT
At man city, given the money he had to spend, he did one awful job, hence the sack he got. Didn't ruin fulham or man city, but did shaft us and qpr. He got one season didn't he? with the owners already determined to get rid and change guard. He really didn't do badly, signed Robinho who was class, and i believe signed Kompany too, the best servant that club has ever had. He was fucking incredible for us for 3 years, turned us from a shitty, rotting, stale club who were on a downward spiral, into a club that genuinely had realistic aspirations of top 7 finishes. He well and truly fucked it right up but there's obviously a good manager there. Maybe i am still bitter about what he's dpne to our club
|
|