|
|
Post by essexstokey on Feb 20, 2018 17:06:44 GMT
West Ham: Premier League club charged over anti-doping breach linkWest Ham have been charged in relation to regulation 14 (d) of the FA's anti-doping rules. |
|
|
|
Post by riccyfuller93 on Feb 20, 2018 17:07:32 GMT
Fuck that horrible club
|
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Feb 20, 2018 17:09:58 GMT
Hopefully a points deduction  |
|
|
|
Post by wagsastokie on Feb 20, 2018 17:13:51 GMT
Hopefully a points deduction Not a chance the cheeky cockney chappies won the World Cup you know |
|
|
|
Post by metalhead on Feb 20, 2018 17:15:34 GMT
Hopefully a points deduction No chance of that happening. Brother Trevor will already be down there having discussions on how to 'amicably' resolve this. |
|
|
|
Post by samba :) on Feb 20, 2018 17:36:56 GMT
Court "can you provide evidence to show that the players arent taking drugs"
Club "look at the league table"
|
|
|
|
Post by claytonscrubs on Feb 20, 2018 17:38:22 GMT
The “Dildo Brothers“ must be behind this... That club stinks of druggies, hoes and sex toys.
Allegedly....😃
|
|
|
|
Post by GreaterGlasgowstokie on Feb 20, 2018 17:44:53 GMT
Doping, alleged illegal payments to agents in order to tap up players and the players family, taking taxpayers money albeit indirectly and as a result of mismanagement by public body responsible, that is the modern west ham for you
|
|
|
|
Post by medwaypotter on Feb 20, 2018 17:50:28 GMT
Explains Arnies turn around in form.
|
|
|
|
Post by maninasuitcase on Feb 20, 2018 19:07:28 GMT
30 point deduction for the cockney cunts.
|
|
|
|
Post by emmbrook1956 on Feb 20, 2018 19:38:59 GMT
Deduct 10 points at least
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2018 19:50:18 GMT
Let's see how they fiddle this one!
|
|
|
|
Post by Edward Tattsyrup on Feb 20, 2018 20:12:04 GMT
£100,000 fine should see them off the hook.
I really hate football at the moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by exiledpotter on Feb 20, 2018 20:22:41 GMT
Sadly the going rate for fines is £35k (but the FA did say they were going to raise them).
|
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Feb 20, 2018 20:52:57 GMT
Reading the story it seems there's no suggestion there's been any actual doping, it's just some admin cock-up like not registering a player's address correctly.
|
|
|
|
Post by trickydicky73 on Feb 20, 2018 20:53:05 GMT
£100,000 fine should see them off the hook. I really hate football at the moment. Me, too. It's wank, but we are constantly told that it's ace, so it must be ace. I have grown tired of it. |
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Feb 20, 2018 21:05:33 GMT
Reading the story it seems there's no suggestion there's been any actual doping, it's just some admin cock-up like not registering a player's address correctly. If this happened in athletics or any other Olympic sport it would lead to a 2 year drugs ban for avoidance even though its an admin mistake |
|
|
|
Post by rawli on Feb 20, 2018 21:16:31 GMT
Deduct 10 points at least We need more than that |
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Feb 20, 2018 21:46:10 GMT
Deduct 10 points at least Might not be enough to save us! Better make it 20.😜 |
|
|
|
Post by BuzzB on Feb 20, 2018 22:34:11 GMT
West Ham could have eleven Russian athletes playing whilst as high as kites and fuck all would still happen.
Horrible people running a good club.
|
|
|
|
Post by 3putts on Feb 21, 2018 6:28:21 GMT
Reading the story it seems there's no suggestion there's been any actual doping, it's just some admin cock-up like not registering a player's address correctly. if you know about a player involved in drugs by not notifying of their wherabouts you are complicit in avoiding drug tests.guilty |
|
|
|
Post by cobhamstokey on Feb 21, 2018 7:11:27 GMT
It’s always them isn’t it.
Illegal players Tevez etc
The OS
Drug tests
Dodging FFP
Press bias farewell to the Boleyn
Tapping up Arnie
|
|
cbwhu
Academy Starlet
Posts: 155 
|
Post by cbwhu on Feb 21, 2018 7:56:44 GMT
Hopefully a points deduction Highly unlikely Bournemouth and Man City have both been done for the exact same thing in the last year and got fined 35 grand each |
|
|
|
Post by Veritas on Feb 21, 2018 9:00:21 GMT
Hopefully a points deduction Highly unlikely Bournemouth and Man City have both been done for the exact same thing in the last year and got fined 35 grand each That seems about right, as much as I despise West Ham and their owners and Chief Executive this is a nothing story. |
|
cbwhu
Academy Starlet
Posts: 155
|
Post by cbwhu on Feb 21, 2018 9:22:07 GMT
Highly unlikely Bournemouth and Man City have both been done for the exact same thing in the last year and got fined 35 grand each That seems about right, as much as I despise West Ham and their owners and Chief Executive this is a nothing story. One of the breaches was accidentally transposing two numbers on someones address, so saying they lived at 46 instead of 64 or whatever minor admin stuff |
|
|
|
Post by essexstokey on Feb 21, 2018 10:30:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by bloody56 on Feb 21, 2018 10:34:26 GMT
That seems about right, as much as I despise West Ham and their owners and Chief Executive this is a nothing story. One of the breaches was accidentally transposing two numbers on someones address, so saying they lived at 46 instead of 64 or whatever minor admin stuff At £35K a shout, you would think that they would have someone double checking and proof reading the submissions to the appropriate organisation. Hopefully SCFC won't make the same mistake, after all if anyone lives in the same street as a footballer they won't want anyone tuning up on the doorstep to take the piss. |
|
|
|
Post by pb1863 on Feb 21, 2018 10:38:27 GMT
It’s Carlos Tevez fault
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 21, 2018 10:55:25 GMT
The “Dildo Brothers“ must be behind this... That club stinks of druggies, hoes and sex toys. Allegedly....😃 I wanna sign up!! |
|
|
|
Post by ohbottom on Feb 21, 2018 15:44:41 GMT
Reading the story it seems there's no suggestion there's been any actual doping, it's just some admin cock-up like not registering a player's address correctly. if you know about a player involved in drugs by not notifying of their wherabouts you are complicit in avoiding drug tests.guilty That's not what the story is about |
|
