|
Post by potterglen on Jan 30, 2018 20:45:08 GMT
As if double training sessions, watching upcoming opposition, players dining together wasn’t enough, I can hear every word at press conferences. Time will tell if he’s to be successful but he’s giving us his best shot and jeez, I’m looking forward to games again.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 30, 2018 20:50:34 GMT
Certainly not rowett as you proved with your inane ramblings yesterday What "inane ramblings" are they matey?
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 30, 2018 20:58:41 GMT
Certainly not rowett as you proved with your inane ramblings yesterday What "inane ramblings" are they matey? How many posts/threads did you have deleted yesterday?
|
|
|
Post by 3putts on Jan 30, 2018 21:01:41 GMT
he reminds me of lou and that cannot be a bad thing.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 30, 2018 21:11:09 GMT
What "inane ramblings" are they matey? How many posts/threads did you have deleted yesterday? How do you know that? My original thread was deleted because I questioned the statements on this message board about an approach to Rowett from SCFC. Quite a legitimate question. I was informed by the Admin that I was given thirty minutes to provide a link to my story. My thread was then deleted. I didn't receive any message to this effect prior to the deletion. Bizarre. The story was in the Sunday Mirror and quite clearly stated that Rowett was approached by Stoke. Rowett confirmed this. This is obviously a very touchy subject for you and your message board crew. Bizarre.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 30, 2018 21:14:35 GMT
How many posts/threads did you have deleted yesterday? How do you know that? My original thread was deleted because I questioned the statements on this message board about an approach to Rowett from SCFC. Quite a legitimate question. I was informed by the Admin that I was given thirty minutes to provide a link to my story. My thread was then deleted. I didn't receive any message to this effect prior to the deletion. Bizarre. The story was in the Sunday Mirror and quite clearly stated that Rowett was approached by Stoke. Rowett confirmed this. This is obviously a very touchy subject for you and your message board crew. Bizarre. Should have been quite easy for you to have provided a link, not once but twice, then shouldn't It News stories from the mirror are easily accessible but not one person other than you saw it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2018 21:14:48 GMT
How many posts/threads did you have deleted yesterday? How do you know that? My original thread was deleted because I questioned the statements on this message board about an approach to Rowett from SCFC. Quite a legitimate question. I was informed by the Admin that I was given thirty minutes to provide a link to my story. My thread was then deleted. I didn't receive any message to this effect prior to the deletion. Bizarre. The story was in the Sunday Mirror and quite clearly stated that Rowett was approached by Stoke. Rowett confirmed this. This is obviously a very touchy subject for you and your message board crew. Bizarre. Do you have a link to the Mirror story?
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 30, 2018 21:21:37 GMT
How do you know that? My original thread was deleted because I questioned the statements on this message board about an approach to Rowett from SCFC. Quite a legitimate question. I was informed by the Admin that I was given thirty minutes to provide a link to my story. My thread was then deleted. I didn't receive any message to this effect prior to the deletion. Bizarre. The story was in the Sunday Mirror and quite clearly stated that Rowett was approached by Stoke. Rowett confirmed this. This is obviously a very touchy subject for you and your message board crew. Bizarre. Should have been quite easy for you to have provided a link, not once but twice, then shouldn't It News stories from the mirror are easily accessible but not one person other than you saw it. What?? Hahaha... No I don't have a link. It was in print this Sunday. Laughable. Leave it with me... if I can't get a link then I will photocopy the article and post it to the Oatcake ok. For your attention. Fookin ell... what's your issue with this??
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 30, 2018 21:23:57 GMT
Should have been quite easy for you to have provided a link, not once but twice, then shouldn't It News stories from the mirror are easily accessible but not one person other than you saw it. What?? Hahaha... No I don't have a link. It was in print this Sunday. Laughable. Leave it with me... if I can't get a link then I will photocopy the article and post it to the Oatcake ok. For your attention. Fookin ell... what's your issue with this?? No issue with it from me. Would love to see and read the article. If it appeared in the paper it would be available online.
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Jan 30, 2018 21:24:53 GMT
Maybe also the fact that he's a Jock. Consider a number of the great British managers, Busby, Shankly, Stein, Fergie, together with two of the most successful managers Stoke have had, McGory and Lou, they all happen to be Jocks. On the other hand it might just be coincidental nonsense. Just a thought like. Not coincidence, the Jocks are natural leaders and fighters. They are also good innovators with many inventors and designers throughout history and the world like Carnegie. Lambert follows two Welshmen at Stoke, who happen to have been two of the outstanding managers in Stoke's history. The Welsh have not produced as many leaders in history, their national traits are in the fields of the arts, particularly music. They are also excellent team members, who pull together stronger than most nations; a team of Welshmen can be very formidable. The Welsh also like eating daffodils and dragons I hear.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 30, 2018 21:28:21 GMT
What?? Hahaha... No I don't have a link. It was in print this Sunday. Laughable. Leave it with me... if I can't get a link then I will photocopy the article and post it to the Oatcake ok. For your attention. Fookin ell... what's your issue with this?? No issue with it from me. Would love to see and read the article. If it appeared in the paper it would be available online. Is every article in any newspaper online? Not being funny ... but is it.? No worries matey... it will be copied and posted tomorrow. You're calling me a liar which I don't take kindly to.
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jan 30, 2018 21:30:10 GMT
Is it just me or does it seem like Spinksy and the Sentivale are really banging in a few digs in at the old regime.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 30, 2018 21:32:32 GMT
No issue with it from me. Would love to see and read the article. If it appeared in the paper it would be available online. Is every article in any newspaper online? Not being funny ... but is it.? No worries matey... it will be copied and posted tomorrow. You're calling me a liar which I don't take kindly to. I'm calling you no such thing. I would love to see and read the article. Third time lucky for you hopefully having tried and failed at least twice yesterday.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 30, 2018 21:39:31 GMT
Is every article in any newspaper online? Not being funny ... but is it.? No worries matey... it will be copied and posted tomorrow. You're calling me a liar which I don't take kindly to. I'm calling you no such thing. I would love to see and read the article. Third time lucky for you hopefully having tried and failed at least twice yesterday. Nice smiley matey... Hopefully you will get the message that I wasn't asked for a link yesterday. My posts were deleted without any notification and no initial explanation. Until I asked. No worries ... the photocopy will be at Oatcake HQ within a couple of days.
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 30, 2018 21:41:25 GMT
I'm calling you no such thing. I would love to see and read the article. Third time lucky for you hopefully having tried and failed at least twice yesterday. Nice smiley matey... Hopefully you will get the message that I wasn't asked for a link yesterday. My posts were deleted without any notification and no initial explanation. Until I asked. No worries ... the photocopy will be at Oatcake HQ within a couple of days. I happened to see both threads...hence my comments Go the whole hog. Send a letter in for inclusion in the magazine with the cut out. Let's go the old fashioned route
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 30, 2018 21:43:53 GMT
You started the thread and were asked to post a link to an interview with Rowett. The thread was left for a good half an hour before it was removed. Within minutes of it being removed you started a new one - again with no link - which was also removed.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 30, 2018 21:47:49 GMT
Nice smiley matey... Hopefully you will get the message that I wasn't asked for a link yesterday. My posts were deleted without any notification and no initial explanation. Until I asked. No worries ... the photocopy will be at Oatcake HQ within a couple of days. I happened to see both threads...hence my comments Go the whole hog. Send a letter in for inclusion in the magazine with the cut out. Let's go the old fashioned route You must have been bloody quick!! I will repeat.. there was no notification to me to provide a link. That aside... Why is this such a sensitive issue with you lot? I've seen posts declaring war and slander on here a lot worse than mine. What's the problem?
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 30, 2018 21:53:50 GMT
More like QSF given that we had no interest in Rowett in the first place. So you know that we didn't approach Rowett do you ??
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 30, 2018 21:57:33 GMT
I happened to see both threads...hence my comments Go the whole hog. Send a letter in for inclusion in the magazine with the cut out. Let's go the old fashioned route You must have been bloody quick!! I will repeat.. there was no notification to me to provide a link. That aside... Why is this such a sensitive issue with you lot? I've seen posts declaring war and slander on here a lot worse than mine. What's the problem? Weve already told, you were asked to supply a link in that thread. If you're going to attribute a quote to someone then they have to have said it. You either supply a link or a screenshot/photo of the quote from an article. If you're on a phone, just take a picture of the quote in the article you claim to have read and attach it to your post. It should take you no longer than half a minute...
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2018 21:58:01 GMT
I happened to see both threads...hence my comments Go the whole hog. Send a letter in for inclusion in the magazine with the cut out. Let's go the old fashioned route You must have been bloody quick!! I will repeat.. there was no notification to me to provide a link. That aside... Why is this such a sensitive issue with you lot? I've seen posts declaring war and slander on here a lot worse than mine. What's the problem? I thought I saw three threads deleted.
|
|
|
Post by GreaterGlasgowstokie on Jan 30, 2018 22:01:51 GMT
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Jan 30, 2018 22:03:43 GMT
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 30, 2018 22:03:58 GMT
You must have been bloody quick!! I will repeat.. there was no notification to me to provide a link. That aside... Why is this such a sensitive issue with you lot? I've seen posts declaring war and slander on here a lot worse than mine. What's the problem? Weve already told, you were asked to supply a link in that thread. If you're going to attribute a quote to someone then they have to have said it. You either supply a link or a screenshot/photo of the quote from an article. If you're on a phone, just take a picture of the quote in the article you claim to have read and attach it to your post. It should take you no longer than half a minute... I wasn't asked to supply a link. As said previously the hard copy photocopy article will be at your mailing address in a few days.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jan 30, 2018 22:04:38 GMT
Weve already told, you were asked to supply a link in that thread. If you're going to attribute a quote to someone then they have to have said it. You either supply a link or a screenshot/photo of the quote from an article. If you're on a phone, just take a picture of the quote in the article you claim to have read and attach it to your post. It should take you no longer than half a minute... I wasn't asked to supply a link. As said previously the hard copy photocopy article will be at your mailing address in a few days. Don't bother.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 30, 2018 22:07:29 GMT
You must have been bloody quick!! I will repeat.. there was no notification to me to provide a link. That aside... Why is this such a sensitive issue with you lot? I've seen posts declaring war and slander on here a lot worse than mine. What's the problem? I thought I saw three threads deleted. No clem Only two. Personally ... Methinks the lady doth protest too much.
|
|
|
Post by GreaterGlasgowstokie on Jan 30, 2018 22:07:50 GMT
Why would you believe stoke would approach Rowett? Give it a rest
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 30, 2018 22:08:24 GMT
You must have been bloody quick!! I will repeat.. there was no notification to me to provide a link. That aside... Why is this such a sensitive issue with you lot? I've seen posts declaring war and slander on here a lot worse than mine. What's the problem? Weve already told, you were asked to supply a link in that thread. If you're going to attribute a quote to someone then they have to have said it. You either supply a link or a screenshot/photo of the quote from an article. If you're on a phone, just take a picture of the quote in the article you claim to have read and attach it to your post. It should take you no longer than half a minute... It’s difficult to screenshot something that doesn’t exist though.
|
|
|
Post by andystokey on Jan 30, 2018 22:08:27 GMT
I happened to see both threads...hence my comments Go the whole hog. Send a letter in for inclusion in the magazine with the cut out. Let's go the old fashioned route You must have been bloody quick!! I will repeat.. there was no notification to me to provide a link. That aside... Why is this such a sensitive issue with you lot? I've seen posts declaring war and slander on here a lot worse than mine. What's the problem? I saw it too and was about to reply to tell you that the quote in quote marks was never attributed or true but the thread was gone in the time it took to type my response.
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 30, 2018 22:09:04 GMT
Well..that is conclusive proof isn't it.😎
|
|
|
Post by davejohnno1 on Jan 30, 2018 22:10:34 GMT
More like QSF given that we had no interest in Rowett in the first place. So you know that we didn't approach Rowett do you ?? I know what I've always said I know...that we met with our first choice of manager on Monday 8th January. That man was not Gary rowett and by then he had signed a new contract at derby. We made no approach to derby to speak to him, as confirmed by both clubs, so I don't see how we could have approached rowett...hence I was looking forward to seeing the link that numerous posters requested on both of the threads you started yesterday. Nothing more sinister than that from my end.
|
|