|
|
Post by Linx on Jan 17, 2018 17:59:25 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2018 18:02:42 GMT
So they're bringing Stoke-on-Trent into it despite the article itself clearly demonstrating that Bristol is less successful? How bizarre.....
|
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Jan 17, 2018 18:02:42 GMT
It's there in the article, Bristol
|
|
|
|
Post by teenagefanclub on Jan 17, 2018 18:02:44 GMT
Bristol?
|
|
|
|
Post by terrorofturfmoor on Jan 17, 2018 18:03:31 GMT
You can forget about Vale....
But as for Stoke, it is rather embarrassing!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by samba :) on Jan 17, 2018 18:14:10 GMT
Surely its carlisle?
|
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on Jan 17, 2018 18:16:15 GMT
Chester?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2018 18:17:10 GMT
Cambridge?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2018 18:17:29 GMT
Exeter?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2018 18:17:53 GMT
Hereford?
|
|
|
|
Post by BraveSirRobin on Jan 17, 2018 18:18:11 GMT
York?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2018 18:18:27 GMT
Newport?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2018 18:19:12 GMT
Lincoln?
|
|
|
|
Post by adamsson on Jan 17, 2018 18:21:10 GMT
Litchfield?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 17, 2018 18:21:27 GMT
Wells?
|
|
|
|
Post by madnellie on Jan 17, 2018 18:24:33 GMT
Ely?
|
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Jan 17, 2018 18:31:36 GMT
"Multi-club city" chap(esse)s
|
|
|
|
Post by madnellie on Jan 17, 2018 18:35:26 GMT
"Multi-club city" chap(esse)s Frantically checks to see if Ely has more than one club... Doh! |
|
|
|
Post by eastyorksexile on Jan 17, 2018 18:35:51 GMT
Hull
|
|
|
|
Post by Lakeland Potter on Jan 17, 2018 18:36:07 GMT
It did say "multi club city" presumably that means cities which have at some point had two league clubs. Cites with one or no league clubs don't count - otherwise St Davids and St Asaph would take some beating.
|
|
|
|
Post by leicspotter on Jan 17, 2018 18:38:54 GMT
It did say "multi club city" presumably that means cities which have at some point had two league clubs. Cites with one or no league clubs don't count - otherwise St Davids and St Asaph would take some beating. You could add Wakefield...the largest City without a league team |
|
|
|
Post by y_oh_y_delilah on Jan 17, 2018 18:40:44 GMT
Brighton?
Brighton and Hove?
|
|
|
|
Post by leicspotter on Jan 17, 2018 18:50:46 GMT
Glasgow, Edinburgh, Dundee...all multi-club cities...playing in Scotland...how much more unsuccessful can you be  P.S. European Cups don't count  |
|
|
|
Post by stokebloke on Jan 17, 2018 18:56:42 GMT
Milton Keynes
|
|
|
|
Post by Vermelho20312505 on Jan 17, 2018 19:03:01 GMT
It did say "multi club city" presumably that means cities which have at some point had two league clubs. Cites with one or no league clubs don't count - otherwise St Davids and St Asaph would take some beating. Bit of a weird premise that a city with 2 league teams is deemed less successful that cities who don't have league teams. |
|
|
|
Post by Eggybread on Jan 17, 2018 19:03:13 GMT
Plymouth Bournemouth
|
|
|
|
Post by march4 on Jan 17, 2018 20:17:28 GMT
Bradford had more than one league club when I were a lad (actually when I was an adult as well).
They couldn't even keep both of them!
|
|
|
|
Post by dastokie on Jan 17, 2018 20:17:54 GMT
Worcester
|
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Jan 17, 2018 20:33:53 GMT
It did say "multi club city" presumably that means cities which have at some point had two league clubs. Cites with one or no league clubs don't count - otherwise St Davids and St Asaph would take some beating. Bit of a weird premise that a city with 2 league teams is deemed less successful that cities who don't have league teams. They're not deemed less successful than them |
|
|
|
Post by smallthorner on Jan 17, 2018 20:39:53 GMT
Brighton? Brighton and Hove? Brighton is a town. |
|
