|
Post by scfcwebby on Dec 29, 2017 12:51:20 GMT
Ahhh the days where the manager would wear the away kit for the team photo Carl Hoefkens was a handsome chappy! Not had a decent RB since him either
|
|
|
Post by gregstokie on Dec 29, 2017 12:54:14 GMT
In terms of sexiness, Mark Prudhoe may have only had a 2 inch widge, but had a good 16 stone to hammer it home with you have to consider.
I appreciate Dean Whitehead may as well be referred to as a ‘double-bagger’. However also please bear in mind that due to his square head he should actually be upped in ‘classification’ to the single bagger category. Rationale is that the bag would fit his head so well it wouldn’t come off that easily, hence reducing the need to add the second ‘contingency bag’.
Carl Muggleton or ‘Mugley’ to his friends may also be recategorised as he could also be concidered quite the attractive Baboon to many a monkey out there.
Anyway, many considerations for such an important thread which has the potential to surpass the ‘hast thee their brown wings’ thread of 2012. Maybe we could apply for a government grant for this?
|
|
|
Post by Wizbit on Dec 29, 2017 12:56:40 GMT
Ahhh the days where the manager would wear the away kit for the team photo Carl Hoefkens was a handsome chappy! Not had a decent RB since him either Very true ! ...... I loved that kit !!
|
|
|
Post by scfc75 on Dec 29, 2017 13:25:51 GMT
The fact that Choupo isn't in his own category of uber-sexiness proves what a sham this thread is.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2017 15:13:45 GMT
I'd like to sit Shaq on my knee, and give him a good talking to!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2017 15:15:23 GMT
The fact that Choupo isn't in his own category of uber-sexiness proves what a sham this thread is. Spot on mate
|
|
|
Post by boothenboys1863 on Dec 29, 2017 16:53:40 GMT
What the fuck is going on here?
I clicked on this thread thinking it would lead me to a website full of female football fans and we have to judge them whose got the best looking fans.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 29, 2017 23:55:34 GMT
Chipper and Cameron are a right pair of lookers.
|
|
|
Post by southernish on Jan 10, 2018 13:00:02 GMT
Think that Bauer can contribute a lot
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2018 13:03:11 GMT
If QSF gets the job we're automatically Champions League contenders. A handsome man with an impressive beard......
|
|
|
Post by PotterLog on Jan 10, 2018 13:38:17 GMT
Shaq is classic Picasso surely
|
|
|
Post by foster on Jan 10, 2018 13:38:20 GMT
Sexy: Butland, Eric, Sobhi Handsome: Johnson, Affelay, Jese Normal: Edwards, Choupo, Shaq, Saido, Grant A bit picasso: Wimmer, BMI, Kurt Fuglies: Ryan, Fletcher, Adam, our Joe, Crouch
To be fair, Adam needs to go into a category of his own. Ryan has made effort recently with the longer hair, Joe with the shorter hair, Fletcher seems to have a better complection than he used to and Crouch is...well Crouch.
Adam on the other hand doesn't even bother to get his teeth fixed with all his fuck money.
If I were gay (which I'm not) then I'd probably put Affelay into the sexy category (sexy for gay people), but as I'm 100% not gay (at all) then I probably wouldn't care. Which I clearly don't, because I'm not gay.
|
|
|
Post by Block 22 on Jan 10, 2018 13:53:12 GMT
Sexy: Butland, Eric, Sobhi Handsome: Johnson, Affelay, Jese Normal: Edwards, Choupo, Shaq, Saido, Grant A bit picasso: Wimmer, BMI, Kurt Fuglies: Ryan, Fletcher, Adam, our Joe, Crouch To be fair, Adam needs to go into a category of his own. Ryan has made effort recently with the longer hair, Joe with the shorter hair, Fletcher seems to have a better complection than he used to and Crouch is...well Crouch. Adam on the other hand doesn't even bother to get his teeth fixed with all his fuck money. If I were gay (which I'm not) then I'd probably put Affelay into the sexy category (sexy for gay people), but as I'm 100% not gay (at all) then I probably wouldn't care. Which I clearly don't, because I'm not gay. You sure mate, you seem a bit insecure.. and there’s definite a need there to over reinforce the fact. Just embrace it mate.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Jan 10, 2018 13:56:03 GMT
Sexy: Butland, Eric, Sobhi Handsome: Johnson, Affelay, Jese Normal: Edwards, Choupo, Shaq, Saido, Grant A bit picasso: Wimmer, BMI, Kurt Fuglies: Ryan, Fletcher, Adam, our Joe, Crouch To be fair, Adam needs to go into a category of his own. Ryan has made effort recently with the longer hair, Joe with the shorter hair, Fletcher seems to have a better complection than he used to and Crouch is...well Crouch. Adam on the other hand doesn't even bother to get his teeth fixed with all his fuck money. If I were gay (which I'm not) then I'd probably put Affelay into the sexy category (sexy for gay people), but as I'm 100% not gay (at all) then I probably wouldn't care. Which I clearly don't, because I'm not gay. You sure mate, you seem a bit insecure.. and there’s definite a need there to over reinforce the fact. Just embrace it mate. No way mate. I'm not gay. I did watch the entire series of desperate housewives, devious maids and chesapeak shores, but that's quite manly in my opinion. I'm onto vampire diaries now and if that doesn't say '100% macho' like a fat cock round the chops then I don't know what does.
|
|
|
Post by Block 22 on Jan 10, 2018 13:58:07 GMT
You sure mate, you seem a bit insecure.. and there’s definite a need there to over reinforce the fact. Just embrace it mate. No way mate. I'm not gay. I did watch the entire series of desperate housewives, devious maids and chesapeak shores, but that's quite manly in my opinion. I'm onto vampire diaries now and if that doesn't say '100% macho' like a fat cock round the chops then I don't know what does. Like I said mate, just embrace it. No one else cares what your label is, no need to hide it. I thought you’d have watched Gossip Girl amongst all that, to be honest.
|
|
|
Post by foster on Jan 10, 2018 14:04:28 GMT
No way mate. I'm not gay. I did watch the entire series of desperate housewives, devious maids and chesapeak shores, but that's quite manly in my opinion. I'm onto vampire diaries now and if that doesn't say '100% macho' like a fat cock round the chops then I don't know what does. Like I said mate, just embrace it. No one else cares what your label is, no need to hide it. I thought you’d have watched Gossip Girl amongst all that, to be honest. You're kidding right? Gossip girl is so gay. Would never watch that. Mick mills has the whole collection on Blu Ray though.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2018 14:05:05 GMT
Sexy: Butland, Eric, Sobhi Handsome: Johnson, Affelay, Jese Normal: Edwards, Choupo, Shaq, Saido, Grant A bit picasso: Wimmer, BMI, Kurt Fuglies: Ryan, Fletcher, Adam, our Joe, Crouch To be fair, Adam needs to go into a category of his own. Ryan has made effort recently with the longer hair, Joe with the shorter hair, Fletcher seems to have a better complection than he used to and Crouch is...well Crouch. Adam on the other hand doesn't even bother to get his teeth fixed with all his fuck money. If I were gay (which I'm not) then I'd probably put Affelay into the sexy category (sexy for gay people), but as I'm 100% not gay (at all) then I probably wouldn't care. Which I clearly don't, because I'm not gay. You are clearly definitely gay. Nothing to be scared of (apart from a beast of a whopper). I agree that Adam deserves his own category, but then we'd also have to accept the call for Choupo to have his too - and then we'll just end up with a whole smorgasbord of categories with people just going around creating new ones willy nilly...and then there'd be arguments in terms of which category then ranked higher than others. Nobody is going to administer that, it would be ludicrous. So, I'd like to stick to the five. We may, however, consider levels within each category. So, whilst it would not be fair to consider ugly boy Fletcher as the same level of fugliness as Adam - he is still fugly and does belong in that category.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2018 14:07:42 GMT
If QSF gets the job we're automatically Champions League contenders. A handsome man with an impressive beard...... Oh definitely. If QSF (Quique Sexy Fucker) gets the job then I'll organise a communal welcome masturbation sesh at Sir Stan's statue
|
|
|
Post by unknown182 on Jan 10, 2018 14:18:14 GMT
QSF is also the nicest smelling man in football apparently
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2018 14:36:19 GMT
QSF is also the nicest smelling man in football apparently If he doesn’t smell of Relgex and Deep Heat he’s not a proper football man......
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2018 14:50:16 GMT
QSF is also the nicest smelling man in football apparently If he doesn’t smell of Relgex and Deep Heat he’s not a proper football man...... Quique Sexy Fucker doesn't need Deep Heat - he is naturally warmed through his sexiness, with extra thermal insulation by his big hairy beard and his bigger hairier bollocks
|
|
|
Post by Block 22 on Jan 10, 2018 15:02:25 GMT
Like I said mate, just embrace it. No one else cares what your label is, no need to hide it. I thought you’d have watched Gossip Girl amongst all that, to be honest. You're kidding right? Gossip girl is so gay. Would never watch that. Mick mills has the whole collection on Blu Ray though. You fit all the stereotypes of a man desperately trying to prove his heterosexual masculinity to the world. Half naked bird on your avatar, reinforcing your straightness. EMBRACE IT. You’ve definitely watched gossip girl don’t pretend otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by sergeifaye on Jan 10, 2018 18:51:35 GMT
With Bojan and Muni still being on loan, how do you rate our squad sexiness? Sexy: Butland, Eric, Sobhi Handsome: Johnson, Affelay, Jese Normal: Edwards, Choupo, Shaq, Saido, Grant A bit picasso: Wimmer, BMI, Kurt Fuglies: Ryan, Fletcher, Adam, our Joe, Crouch Diouf not sure about, either normal or picasso. Throw in Coates, Hughes, Scholes, Carto, Bowen to the fuglies too and Stoke are definitely balanced in favour of being not sexy at all. Maybe it is as simple as this, as the reason we are not good to watch. It is absolutely impossible to put Crouchy in any category other than Sexy since he managed to land the absolute banger Abbey Clancy. He may be ugly but you don't land that without something we clearly cannot see. Yeah a couple of million in the bank.
|
|
|
Post by sergeifaye on Jan 10, 2018 18:56:07 GMT
With Bojan and Muni still being on loan, how do you rate our squad sexiness? Sexy: Butland, Eric, Sobhi Handsome: Johnson, Affelay, Jese Normal: Edwards, Choupo, Shaq, Saido, Grant A bit picasso: Wimmer, BMI, Kurt Fuglies: Ryan, Fletcher, Adam, our Joe, Crouch Diouf not sure about, either normal or picasso. Throw in Coates, Hughes, Scholes, Carto, Bowen to the fuglies too and Stoke are definitely balanced in favour of being not sexy at all. Maybe it is as simple as this, as the reason we are not good to watch. I've always thought Wimmer was a handsome chap. Just abit chunky. Which I put some of his 18 million quid short comings down to.
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Jan 10, 2018 19:14:06 GMT
I have absolutely no opinion on this, at all ...........although I can see why the OP chose their user name from the thread title
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2018 20:23:57 GMT
I have absolutely no opinion on this, at all ...........although I can see why the OP chose their user name from the thread title Another one in the closet You lot arent fooling anybody. There was no assumption of gayness imposed on the whole Oatcake community just through the creation of this thread. No requirement to post on here if you didnt want to partake in the discussion. It wasn't like there was a misleading or conspicuous title which makes you wonder "hmm...I wonder if this is the thread which has confirmed our new manager" or "yes, finally a worthy cause to donate to" - it's just 'straight' to the point...team sexiness and hey ho its a thread about how sexy out team is. There was nothing to entice you in with false promise about an unrelated topic and then a warning that "we know you have read this post and now you must declare your non-gayness or you will be exposed to the world". Yet somehow, we have a number of people who have strolled on here and decided to express their apparent heterosexuality...
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Jan 10, 2018 20:30:03 GMT
I have absolutely no opinion on this, at all ...........although I can see why the OP chose their user name from the thread title Another one in the closet You lot arent fooling anybody. There was no assumption of gayness imposed on the whole Oatcake community just through the creation of this thread. No requirement to post on here if you didnt want to partake in the discussion. It wasn't like there was a misleading or conspicuous title which makes you wonder "hmm...I wonder if this is the thread which has confirmed our new manager" or "yes, finally a worthy cause to donate to" - it's just 'straight' to the point...team sexiness and hey ho its a thread about how sexy out team is. There was nothing to entice you in with false promise about an unrelated topic and then a warning that "we know you have read this post and now you must declare your non-gayness or you will be exposed to the world". Yet somehow, we have a number of people who have strolled on here and decided to express their apparent heterosexuality... Pmsl psychobabble
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Jan 10, 2018 20:37:40 GMT
I have absolutely no opinion on this, at all ...........although I can see why the OP chose their user name from the thread title Another one in the closet You lot arent fooling anybody. There was no assumption of gayness imposed on the whole Oatcake community just through the creation of this thread. No requirement to post on here if you didnt want to partake in the discussion. It wasn't like there was a misleading or conspicuous title which makes you wonder "hmm...I wonder if this is the thread which has confirmed our new manager" or "yes, finally a worthy cause to donate to" - it's just 'straight' to the point...team sexiness and hey ho its a thread about how sexy out team is. There was nothing to entice you in with false promise about an unrelated topic and then a warning that "we know you have read this post and now you must declare your non-gayness or you will be exposed to the world". Yet somehow, we have a number of people who have strolled on here and decided to express their apparent heterosexuality... Btw I assumed you were a female or maybe a gay man, both of which are cool You seem to be making rambling assumptions about my gender or sexual orientation...... hey, I may be female or gay myself.....transgender or bi etc etc But I refuse to mix my football team with my sexual preferences
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2018 20:58:33 GMT
Another one in the closet You lot arent fooling anybody. There was no assumption of gayness imposed on the whole Oatcake community just through the creation of this thread. No requirement to post on here if you didnt want to partake in the discussion. It wasn't like there was a misleading or conspicuous title which makes you wonder "hmm...I wonder if this is the thread which has confirmed our new manager" or "yes, finally a worthy cause to donate to" - it's just 'straight' to the point...team sexiness and hey ho its a thread about how sexy out team is. There was nothing to entice you in with false promise about an unrelated topic and then a warning that "we know you have read this post and now you must declare your non-gayness or you will be exposed to the world". Yet somehow, we have a number of people who have strolled on here and decided to express their apparent heterosexuality... Btw I assumed you were a female or maybe a gay man, both of which are cool You seem to be making rambling assumptions about my gender or sexual orientation...... hey, I may be female or gay myself.....transgender or bi etc etc But I refuse to mix my football team with my sexual preferences That's it my friend...embrace it...
|
|
|
Post by iglugluk on Jan 10, 2018 21:05:07 GMT
Btw I assumed you were a female or maybe a gay man, both of which are cool You seem to be making rambling assumptions about my gender or sexual orientation...... hey, I may be female or gay myself.....transgender or bi etc etc But I refuse to mix my football team with my sexual preferences That's it my friend...embrace it... Wow I can really see the ' stalker ' thing.......
|
|