|
|
Post by Fred Merger on Dec 16, 2017 19:12:16 GMT
I can't believe that any other chairman would tolerate such a turgid amount of results over such a long period of time.Any other Chairman would have surely changed him in the summer!
|
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 16, 2017 19:12:40 GMT
He’d have gone two months after the Liverpool cup game.
|
|
|
|
Post by pavel on Dec 16, 2017 19:13:02 GMT
no
|
|
|
|
Post by Pirate on Dec 16, 2017 19:13:41 GMT
Not a chance
|
|
|
|
Post by songthrush01 on Dec 16, 2017 19:15:17 GMT
no if had any ambition
|
|
|
|
Post by harrysburrow on Dec 16, 2017 19:15:28 GMT
Of course not - look at the other sackings already this season?
|
|
|
|
Post by chrisparker on Dec 16, 2017 19:15:47 GMT
He’d have gone two months after the Liverpool cup game. Not to get in the way of your agenda or anything but we were 7th in the league in the beginning of April in his 3rd season in charge. But as for the question raised by the OP, no I do not think he would've survived under any other chairman in this league. |
|
|
|
Post by FullerMagic on Dec 16, 2017 19:17:41 GMT
They've obviously got a good relationship, and in a way it's admirable. But if he doesn't go in the next 48 hours we've officially entered Emperor Nero territory. Fiddling While Rome Burns.  |
|
|
|
Post by professorplump on Dec 16, 2017 19:18:20 GMT
He’d have gone two months after the Liverpool cup game. That would have been ridiculous. If you say that we should sack the manager after a poor run of form lasting 2 months then we would have two managers every season. Leeds Utd used to do that but it never worked for them. |
|
|
|
Post by Bojan Mackey on Dec 16, 2017 19:20:38 GMT
He’d have gone two months after the Liverpool cup game. That would have been ridiculous. If you say that we should sack the manager after a poor run of form lasting 2 months then we would have two managers every season. Leeds Utd used to do that but it never worked for them. It’s how most Premiership owners operate. |
|
|
|
Post by Pirate on Dec 16, 2017 19:22:46 GMT
They've obviously got a good relationship, and in a way it's admirable. But if he doesn't go in the next 48 hours we've officially entered Emperor Nero territory. Fiddling While Rome Burns. I am not sure it will be enough either way magic, we look like Sunderland to me, no pace, general lack of quality, cant buy a win, players on big contracts who look total duffers. The only difference being we have the opposite problem to there managerial revolving door. I agree though, i cannot see with any rational how MH can still be in a job by Monday morning but it think he will be, at least my gut does. |
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Dec 16, 2017 19:23:38 GMT
He’d have gone two months after the Liverpool cup game. That would have been ridiculous. If you say that we should sack the manager after a poor run of form lasting 2 months then we would have two managers every season. Leeds Utd used to do that but it never worked for them. How about 18 months of shit ? |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2017 19:24:36 GMT
He'd have been sacked and rightfully so, months ago.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinoknockavelli67 on Dec 16, 2017 19:26:27 GMT
They've obviously got a good relationship, and in a way it's admirable. But if he doesn't go in the next 48 hours we've officially entered Emperor Nero territory. Fiddling While Rome Burns. We need to give MH more time we will not be relegated. Berahino will break his duck v west Brom next week and we will win 2/0 |
|
|
|
Post by professorplump on Dec 16, 2017 19:28:23 GMT
That would have been ridiculous. If you say that we should sack the manager after a poor run of form lasting 2 months then we would have two managers every season. Leeds Utd used to do that but it never worked for them. How about 18 months of shit ? Yes I agree but 2 months after the Liverpool game we hadn't had 18 months of shit had we. |
|
|
|
Post by thevoid on Dec 16, 2017 19:36:39 GMT
He should have gone after the collapse against 10-man Leicester last season.
|
|
|
|
Post by professorplump on Dec 16, 2017 19:37:16 GMT
That would have been ridiculous. If you say that we should sack the manager after a poor run of form lasting 2 months then we would have two managers every season. Leeds Utd used to do that but it never worked for them. It’s how most Premiership owners operate. Not really. West Ham gave Bilic quite a lot of time. Ditto West Brom with Pulis. Moyes was given a year at Sunderland. Swansea do change their manager regularly but arguably had they stuck with Guiderlin they would be better off than they are now. There was no way that the Stoke board were going to sack Hughes while we were in the top half of the table. And nor should they. They needed to either back him or sack him last summer but they just let things drift.
|
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Dec 16, 2017 19:39:38 GMT
No, he'd have gone a while ago under anyone else.
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 16, 2017 20:31:55 GMT
A big fat NO from me!
|
|
