|
|
Post by nonameface on Dec 16, 2017 11:44:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by stokecitytalke on Dec 16, 2017 11:47:58 GMT
Wow! Second place.
Hughes out!
|
|
|
|
Post by alster on Dec 16, 2017 11:49:16 GMT
Tried to view this on another thread but couldn't find an arrow to move through the frames. Now I've seen it it explains exactly why he hasn't been sacked. Fucking cheapskate outfit. |
|
|
|
Post by benjaminbiscuit on Dec 16, 2017 11:52:36 GMT
Tried to view this on another thread but couldn't find an arrow to move through the frames. Now I've seen it it explains exactly why he hasn't been sacked. Fucking cheapskate outfit. Spot on organisations mirror their leader and we are now Scholes city a perfect mirror , spineless, without personality , out of our depth , focused entirely on cost |
|
|
|
Post by Laughing Gravy on Dec 16, 2017 11:52:57 GMT
Tried to view this on another thread but couldn't find an arrow to move through the frames. Now I've seen it it explains exactly why he hasn't been sacked. Fucking cheapskate outfit. Indeed. Only Burnley above us and they must have outspent us in reality because they've got double our points. Shit I'm sounding like Benji. Net spend blah blah blah Under investment blah blah blah CEO gone into hiding blah blah blah Exterminate exterminate. |
|
|
|
Post by alster on Dec 16, 2017 12:02:15 GMT
Tried to view this on another thread but couldn't find an arrow to move through the frames. Now I've seen it it explains exactly why he hasn't been sacked. Fucking cheapskate outfit. Indeed. Only Burnley above us and they must have outspent us in reality because they've got double our points. Shit I'm sounding like Benji. Net spend blah blah blah Under investment blah blah blah CEO gone into hiding blah blah blah Exterminate exterminate. Yes in reality even Burnley were more ambitious. They just had the ridiculous fee they secured for Keane to soften the blow and replaced him with a player they already had on the books. Us Arnie and Ramadan springs to mind but we replaced him twice with a big fat loan fee and hundreds of thousands per week in wages, whilst neglecting glaring weaknesses in our squad. Wonder who's playing wide left today? |
|
|
|
Post by auntiegeorge on Dec 16, 2017 12:03:24 GMT
Calm down lads, for god's sake. We're not even half way through the season yet. You can use statistics to make any point your hearts desire but non of it has any bearing on reality.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gods on Dec 16, 2017 12:07:12 GMT
It's beyond very crude, I think they have just divided net spend on transfers (I'm not sure over what period) by total points for each club. In fact I'm not even sure it's net spend, it may simply be transfer spend, if it were net spend some clubs like Spurs would have a negative spend per point.
It's a nonsense anyway, it's all about wages these days, or mostly about wages, and so far as I can tell they haven't factored that in at all. Unless someone is going to tell be different?!
|
|
|
|
Post by GoBoks on Dec 16, 2017 12:08:45 GMT
Tried to view this on another thread but couldn't find an arrow to move through the frames. Now I've seen it it explains exactly why he hasn't been sacked. Fucking cheapskate outfit. Always have been, always will be. I refer you again to the thread about would you still support Stoke if a billionaire pumped massive amounts in to the team. |
|
|
|
Post by GoBoks on Dec 16, 2017 12:10:38 GMT
Tried to view this on another thread but couldn't find an arrow to move through the frames. Now I've seen it it explains exactly why he hasn't been sacked. Fucking cheapskate outfit. Indeed. Only Burnley above us and they must have outspent us in reality because they've got double our points. Shit I'm sounding like Benji. Net spend blah blah blah Under investment blah blah blah CEO gone into hiding blah blah blah Exterminate exterminate. Someone needs to call the doctor! |
|
|
|
Post by GoBoks on Dec 16, 2017 12:13:30 GMT
It's beyond very crude, I think they have just divided net spend on transfers (I'm not sure over what period) by total points for each club. In fact I'm not even sure it's net spend, it may simply be transfer spend, if it were net spend some clubs like Spurs would have a negative spend per point. It's a nonsense anyway, it's all about wages these days, or mostly about wages, and so far as I can tell they haven't factored that in at all. Unless someone is going to tell be different?! And the winner is ...... Derby County! A net spend of a packet of fags and a bottle of wine to end on 13 points and be relegated. 83p per point ... Real Hero’s! |
|
