|
Post by harryburrows on Nov 20, 2017 16:13:52 GMT
Don’t usually comment but two final things. Apologies if already commented on. TP said yesterday that he was too young for national management and what was his SC job if not a sacking? ‘Parted by mutual agreement’ is euphemistic, to say the least. TP was ready to 'leave by mutual consent' yesterday. He had it written all over over his face in the pre-match press meeting. I'm sure subject to a substantial pay off , sounds familiar
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Nov 20, 2017 16:14:13 GMT
Hughes pretty much sunk QPR. He may not of been in charge at the time they 'officially went down' but that's irrelevant. I trust you'll lay the same blame at Pulis door if WBA end up going down this season then ? no the new manager will have half a season to turn it round. Plus TP hasn't botched signings to the club like all the Chinese players that were signed under hughes at QPR
|
|
|
Post by jarhead on Nov 20, 2017 16:15:49 GMT
Not really answering what i have quoted though is it, pugs bear. Well he is clearly doing a better job. He hasn't been sacked twice in 4 seasons and ended up in court owing 6million quid. Brilliant
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Nov 20, 2017 16:16:12 GMT
Well he is clearly doing a better job. He hasn't been sacked twice in 4 seasons and ended up in court owing 6million quid. So because someone ends up in court owning £6M that makes him a worse manager than someone else? Utter drivel as per Forget the court case then, has Hughes been sacked twice in 4 seasons?
|
|
|
Post by Mr_DaftBurger on Nov 20, 2017 16:17:29 GMT
Hughes pretty much sunk QPR. He may not of been in charge at the time they 'officially went down' but that's irrelevant. I trust you'll lay the same blame at Pulis door if WBA end up going down this season then ? No way! Despite them both getting the sack in November no way can you blame Pulis for anything! Pulis Taliban verse 1:1
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Nov 20, 2017 16:21:47 GMT
I trust you'll lay the same blame at Pulis door if WBA end up going down this season then ? no the new manager will have half a season to turn it round. Plus TP hasn't botched signings to the club like all the Chinese players that were signed under hughes at QPR That's true, the new WBA manager will inherit a decent squad and more than likely get more out of them. Now where does that sound familiar...
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Nov 20, 2017 16:22:08 GMT
So because someone ends up in court owning £6M that makes him a worse manager than someone else? Utter drivel as per Forget the court case then, has Hughes been sacked twice in 4 seasons? How can you compare? Under different clubs, different directions, different ambitions. Drivel again mate, bore off.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 20, 2017 16:23:02 GMT
Hughes pretty much sunk QPR. He may not of been in charge at the time they 'officially went down' but that's irrelevant. Redknapp had more than enough time to get them out of it. And the January transfer window.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2017 16:23:42 GMT
Forget the court case then, has Hughes been sacked twice in 4 seasons? How can you compare? Under different clubs, different directions, different ambitions. Drivel again mate, bore off. You telling someone to bore off, the fucking irony!
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Nov 20, 2017 16:24:54 GMT
So because someone ends up in court owning £6M that makes him a worse manager than someone else? Utter drivel as per Forget the court case then, has Hughes been sacked twice in 4 seasons? He has actually...Man City (2009/10) and QPR (2012/13).
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Nov 20, 2017 16:25:56 GMT
Forget the court case then, has Hughes been sacked twice in 4 seasons? How can you compare? Under different clubs, different directions, different ambitions. Drivel again mate, bore off. Bore off because you're being made to look a bit of tool. He has been sacked 3 times in 5 years. All for general shithousery and negative football that drives crowds away. Yet you want him back. And yes, Mark Hughes isn't doing much better at the moment.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Nov 20, 2017 16:27:35 GMT
Forget the court case then, has Hughes been sacked twice in 4 seasons? He has actually...Man City (2009/10) and QPR (2012/13). That's pissed on a few peoples chips.
|
|
|
Post by Pugsley on Nov 20, 2017 16:28:32 GMT
Forget the court case then, has Hughes been sacked twice in 4 seasons? He has actually...Man City (2009/10) and QPR (2012/13). Different clubs, directions, ambitions mate.... I actually mean in the space of time Hughes has been at Stoke and the job he has done in that time but you are correct of course.
|
|
|
Post by rogerjonesisgod on Nov 20, 2017 16:31:22 GMT
Hughes pretty much sunk QPR. He may not of been in charge at the time they 'officially went down' but that's irrelevant. Hughes wasn't 'officially' in charge for over 5 months before the season ended.
|
|
|
Post by thebet365 on Nov 20, 2017 16:31:56 GMT
I trust you'll lay the same blame at Pulis door if WBA end up going down this season then ? no the new manager will have half a season to turn it round. Plus TP hasn't botched signings to the club like all the Chinese players that were signed under hughes at QPR Hughes sacked 23rd November, Pulis sacked 20th November Whats the difference ? I thought you'd at least use the fact that Hughes only managed 4 points at this point, Pulis has 10 points. So I'll give WBA a 6 point handicap in their fight against relegation. I'm willing to overlook the fact that WBA is a steady mid table side and QPR were 1 of the favourites for the drop anyway.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Nov 20, 2017 16:34:01 GMT
How can you compare? Under different clubs, different directions, different ambitions. Drivel again mate, bore off. Bore off because you're being made to look a bit of tool. He has been sacked 3 times in 5 years. All for general shithousery and negative football that drives crowds away. Yet you want him back. And yes, Mark Hughes isn't doing much better at the moment. Well i'm not am i? He has been sacked in twice in 4 seasons, yes, as pointed out in the thread already. So your argument about the £6M that you washed under the carpet because it was irrelevant, and also your other statement is wrong about the sackings.
|
|
|
Post by crapslinger on Nov 20, 2017 16:36:31 GMT
no the new manager will have half a season to turn it round. Plus TP hasn't botched signings to the club like all the Chinese players that were signed under hughes at QPR Hughes sacked 23rd November, Pulis sacked 20th November Whats the difference ? I thought you'd at least use the fact that Hughes only managed 4 points at this point, Pulis has 10 points. So I'll give WBA a 6 point handicap in their fight against relegation. I'm willing to overlook the fact that WBA is a steady mid table side and QPR were 1 of the favourites for the drop anyway. Weren't Leicester one of the favourites for the drop the season they went on to be crowned champions ? , Pulis has left West Brom with a much better squad of players than Hughes left QPR with.
|
|
|
Post by johnnysoul60 on Nov 20, 2017 16:54:54 GMT
Hughes sacked 23rd November, Pulis sacked 20th November Whats the difference ? I thought you'd at least use the fact that Hughes only managed 4 points at this point, Pulis has 10 points. So I'll give WBA a 6 point handicap in their fight against relegation. I'm willing to overlook the fact that WBA is a steady mid table side and QPR were 1 of the favourites for the drop anyway. Weren't Leicester one of the favourites for the drop the season they went on to be crowned champions ? , Pulis has left West Brom with a much better squad of players than Hughes left QPR with. Thts the odd thing, in my view generally Pulis signs better players than Hughes , of course there are exceptions to this but he did put together a decent team at WBA but you need to let decent players express themselves and he just cant do it for long . He did for us at times and certainly for a short time at Palace but he soon drops back to his default position and players and fans can only take so much I guess .
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2017 16:56:26 GMT
Time for a glorious return? Anyone who genuinely believes that needs there head looking at
|
|
|
Post by The Toxic Avenger on Nov 20, 2017 16:56:47 GMT
Hughes sacked 23rd November, Pulis sacked 20th November Whats the difference ? I thought you'd at least use the fact that Hughes only managed 4 points at this point, Pulis has 10 points. So I'll give WBA a 6 point handicap in their fight against relegation. I'm willing to overlook the fact that WBA is a steady mid table side and QPR were 1 of the favourites for the drop anyway. Weren't Leicester one of the favourites for the drop the season they went on to be crowned champions ? , Pulis has left West Brom with a much better squad of players than Hughes left QPR with. Which makes him guiding them to a heroic 2 wins in 22 all the more impressive... Signing good players counts for sod all if you can't get a tune out of them...
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Nov 20, 2017 16:57:11 GMT
Time for a glorious return? Anyone who genuinely believes that needs there head looking at It would be a Good appointment
|
|
|
Post by alster on Nov 20, 2017 17:02:10 GMT
Anyone who genuinely believes that needs there head looking at It would be a Good appointment Agreed phone your doctor immediately and make it.
|
|
|
Post by stormin on Nov 20, 2017 17:03:55 GMT
Pulis should have got rid of Mr Angry, Gary Megson, he has a terible record in coaching and management, also Berahino should not gloat until he starts scoring goals, as presently Pulis's opinion of him stands.
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Nov 20, 2017 17:05:19 GMT
It would be a Good appointment Agreed phone your doctor immediately and make it. the doctor has assured me all is well.
|
|
|
Post by shrewspotter on Nov 20, 2017 17:18:06 GMT
Anyone who genuinely believes that needs there head looking at It would be a Good appointment Good appointment for who, not us surely?
Don't get me wrong, will be always grateful and all that stuff, but that ship sailed, we moved on, the days of the 6 at the back with 2 holding midfielders are long gone, thank god!
If he came back, I would seriously consider not renewing my season ticket
|
|
|
Post by Davef on Nov 20, 2017 17:21:04 GMT
Pulis should have got rid of Mr Angry, Gary Megson, he has a terible record in coaching and management, also Berahino should not gloat until he starts scoring goals, as presently Pulis's opinion of him stands. Pulis took Megson to WBA for heaven's sake! Do you seriously think Pulis doesn't know all about Megson and what he's going to get from him? It's always somebody else's fault.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 20, 2017 17:21:59 GMT
Anyone who genuinely believes that needs there head looking at It would be a Good appointment No it bloody wouldn't. If Pulis comes back to Stoke then my season ticket goes in The Trent. The football at the end was unwatchable.
|
|
|
Post by scfc75 on Nov 20, 2017 17:26:18 GMT
Anyone who genuinely believes that needs there head looking at It would be a Good appointment Before tonight's game, adding this season and last together... Pulis has won 14 of his last 50 premier league games, a win ratio of 28% - goals for 52, against 69 (GD -17) Hughes has won 14 of his last 49 premier league games, a win ratio of 28.57% - goals for 54, against 78 (GD -24) As he'd be a good appointment, it's reasonable to assume that keeping Hughes would be as good a move given their almost identical records.
|
|
|
Post by shrewspotter on Nov 20, 2017 17:30:24 GMT
It would be a Good appointment Before tonight's game, adding this season and last together... Pulis has won 14 of his last 50 premier league games, a win ratio of 28% - goals for 52, against 69 (GD -17) Hughes has won 14 of his last 49 premier league games, a win ratio of 28.57% - goals for 54, against 78 (GD -24) As he'd be a good appointment, it's reasonable to assume that keeping Hughes would be as good a move given their almost identical records. Correct.......And Hughes style of play is way more attractive than watching Pulisball, despite what the records say, at least Hughes has a go
|
|
|
Post by professorplump on Nov 20, 2017 17:32:06 GMT
I reckon there are two people who are really concerned by today's news - Chris Coleman and Paul Clement. Coleman, because had he waited a few days he would have been a strong contender for a much better job than Sunderland. Clement, because his job has just become much less secure now that there is a relegation firefighter available.
|
|