|
|
Post by scfc75 on Nov 7, 2017 17:23:58 GMT
His goals per minute ratio in the last year or so must be pretty fucking impressive. This season (PL only) 153 mins, 3 goals (goal every 51 mins) Last season (PL only) 1,334 mins, 7 goals (goal every 190 mins) Combined 1,487 mins, 10 goals (goal every 148 mins) Career wise Aguero scores in the PL something like once every 107 mins, Harry Kane every 116 mins. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 7, 2017 19:29:34 GMT
His goals per minute ratio in the last year or so must be pretty fucking impressive. This season (PL only) 153 mins, 3 goals (goal every 51 mins) Last season (PL only) 1,334 mins, 7 goals (goal every 190 mins) Combined 1,487 mins, 10 goals (goal every 148 mins) Career wise Aguero scores in the PL something like once every 107 mins, Harry Kane every 116 mins. So a pretty fucking impressive return, more then a goal every two games. |
|
|
|
Post by cheekymatt71 on Nov 7, 2017 20:28:05 GMT
Danny Kelly on talksport saying he should go to Russia as England’s plan B.
He’s great is our Crouch but does seem more effective coming off the bench
|
|
|
|
Post by Will_75 on Nov 7, 2017 22:16:39 GMT
He’s an English football legend who scores goals wherever he goes. Teddy Sheringham de nos jours, innit.
|
|
|
|
Post by senojbor on Nov 8, 2017 7:58:55 GMT
His goals per minute ratio in the last year or so must be pretty fucking impressive. A goal every 81 minutes I think I read |
|
|
|
Post by Ex-term-oat-cake on Nov 8, 2017 8:26:47 GMT
Diouf and Berahino as a front two.
Otherwise WHAT WAS THE BLEEDIN POINT OF SIGNING THEM
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2017 10:52:39 GMT
Diouf and Berahino as a front two. Otherwise WHAT WAS THE BLEEDIN POINT OF SIGNING THEMCouldn't the same be said for every single player |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Nov 8, 2017 12:32:29 GMT
I thought we were meant to have moved on from hoof ball, the reason he works off the bench is because teams aren't set up for it and it takes no skill to lump it, its useful to have but to start with it, no thanks.
|
|
|
|
Post by kustokie on Nov 8, 2017 13:03:01 GMT
Danny Kelly on talksport saying he should go to Russia as England’s plan B. He’s great is our Crouch but does seem more effective coming off the bench I am not sure we can conclude that because I can’t recall when he last had a run of starts. I’d much rather he start, play 60 minutes and get subbed when we’re ahead than the other way around. |
|
|
|
Post by theblackdeath on Nov 8, 2017 20:08:48 GMT
Danny Kelly on talksport saying he should go to Russia as England’s plan B. He’s great is our Crouch but does seem more effective coming off the bench I am not sure we can conclude that because I can’t recall when he last had a run of starts. I’d much rather he start, play 60 minutes and get subbed when we’re ahead than the other way around. Exactly!! Surely the points are more important than how we get them. I think we have lost sight of that. We can play the tippy tappy shit when we are 2-3 up |
|
|
|
Post by thegift on Nov 9, 2017 12:42:29 GMT
Agree 100%, him and Berahino, what’s happened to us having a real go for 20 mins and getting the away team under pressure and getting in front. This will never happen under Hughes. Considering he was a striker his whole setup is beyond bizarre. |
|
|
|
Post by boskampsflaps on Nov 9, 2017 12:45:15 GMT
I am not sure we can conclude that because I can’t recall when he last had a run of starts. I’d much rather he start, play 60 minutes and get subbed when we’re ahead than the other way around. Exactly!! Surely the points are more important than how we get them. I think we have lost sight of that. We can play the tippy tappy shit when we are 2-3 up We may as well have kept Pulis then, Hughes was brought in to improve the watchability of our football, did a good job and is starting to undo his own good work. |
|
|
|
Post by crouchpotato1 on Nov 9, 2017 22:30:06 GMT
|
|
